Risk factors and failures in the management of limb injuries in combat casualties
- 15 Downloads
Treatment of war wounds is based on a sequential surgical strategy, which frequently faces therapeutic failures, which then burden the final functional result. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors of failure of the different treatments to prevent the therapeutic failure.
A monocentric case–control study was done on French war-wounded soldiers treated for an open fracture caused by an invasive war weapon. The primary end point was the treatment failure three months after the injury. The risk factors of failure studied were the traumatic mechanism, the general and local lesional assessment, and the surgery performed.
Between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2016, 57 soldiers were included, with an average follow-up of 3.42 years. On 81 limb segments studied, the most injured segment was the leg (37.0%). A vital or urgent surgery requirement (OR = 1.56; p = 0.02) and bone loss substance (OR = 5.45; CI95% = 1.54–20.09) were risk factors of failure for limb salvage treatment. Improvised explosive device traumatic mechanism (OR = 1.56; p = 0.02) and the persistence of surgical site contamination after two debridement procedures (OR = 1.20; p = 0.04) were risk factors of failure for amputation procedures.
Two main risk factors of treatment failure are highlighted: those in relation to traumatic mechanisms and general lesional assessment and those in relation to surgical site conditions. There is no over risk of failure in relation to surgical procedure and treatment.
KeywordsWar-wound Open fracture Risk factor of failure Combat-related injury
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Mathieu L, Bazile F, Barthélémy R, Duhamel P, Rigal S (2011) Damage control orthopaedics in the context of battlefield injuries: the use of temporary external fixation on combat trauma soldiers. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(8):852–859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2011.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Dubost C, Goudard Y, Soucanye de Landevoisin E, Contargyris C, Evans D, Pauleau G (2016) Combat casualties from two current conflicts with the Seventh French Forward Surgical Team in Mali and Central African Republic in 2014. J R Army Med Corps 162(6):450–455. https://doi.org/10.1136/jramc-2015-000557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lerner A, Fodor L, Soudry M (2006) Is staged external fixation a valuable strategy for war injuries to the limbs? Clin Orthop 448:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000214411.60722.f8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Horst K, Andruszkow H, Weber C, Dienstknecht T, Hildebrand F, Tarkin I et al (2015) Standards of external fixation in prolonged applications to allow safe conversion to definitive extremity surgery: the Aachen algorithm for acute ex fix conversion. Injury 46(Suppl 3):S13–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30005-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mathieu L, Marty A, Ramaki A, Najib A, Ahmadzai W, Fugazzotto DJ et al (2014) Current issues with lower extremity amputations in a country at war: experience from the National Military Hospital of Kabul. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 40(3):387–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-013-0334-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar