International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 735–749 | Cite as

Vitamin D: part II; cod liver oil, ultraviolet radiation, and eradication of rickets

  • Philippe HernigouEmail author
  • Jean Charles Auregan
  • Arnaud Dubory
Orthopaedic Heritage



After Glisson’s description of rickets, it took two centuries to realize that rickets was due to the absence of antirachitic nutrients in the diet or lack exposure of the skin to ultraviolet rays. This bone disease caused by vitamin D deficiency was one of the most common diseases of children 100 years ago. This paper explores how the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of rickets shifted in the first decades of the twentieth century.

Material and methods

Although benefits of cod liver oil as food were known as early as the seventh century, cod liver oil was only proposed as medicinal for rickets in Northern Europe at the end of the eighteenth century. The relationship between rickets and nutritional deficiency was suspected and demonstrated between 1880 and 1915, at the same time of the discovery of other vital substances (vitamins) needed to prevent beriberi, scurvy, and pellagra. Understanding that the lack of photosynthesized vitamin D or the lack of dietary vitamin D was a similar risk of rickets was an important turn in the comprehension of the disease. We look at the sequence and turn of events related to the discovery of vitamin D.


Rickets has been recognized first as a disease of urban living people. Cod liver oil had been used since 1700 as a nonspecific treatment for a range of diseases. Generations of children in cities of the north of Europe had learned to hate the taste and smell of the black oily liquid and then grown up to be parents who, in turn, hated to force it down their children’s throats. Occasional papers before 1900 pointed to its efficacy for rickets, and most textbooks of the early 1900s mentioned it only as a treatment option. The discovery in the early 1900s that artificial and natural ultraviolet rays had both antirachitic activity allowed to produce antirachitic foods just by food irradiation with artificial ultraviolet irradiation. Clinical guidelines were adopted to propose exposure to sunlight or to artificial ultraviolet radiation to prevent rickets in children. By the mid-1920s, rickets was promoted as universal, at times invisible to non-experts, but present to some degree in nearly every young child regardless of race or class. It was thus used to promote the young disciplines of preventive medicine, pediatrics, and public health. Innovative advances were made in the understanding of vitamin D synthesis from 1915 to 1935. A public health campaign of the 1930s was a success to eradicate rickets, using irradiated ergosterol from yeast to enrich milk and other foods with vitamin D, ensuring that the general population was consuming sufficient vitamin D.


Rickets therefore provides an excellent window into the early politics of preventive health and the promotion of targeted interventions in the world. It is also a relevant historical counterpoint for current debates over the role of risk factors (absence of light or sun) for disease (today’s so-called “lifestyle” diseases).


Vitamin D Rickets Cod liver oil Ultraviolet radiation Sunlight Rachitis 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Hernigou P, Auregan JC, Dubory A (2018) Vitamin D: part I; from plankton and calcified skeletons (500 million years ago) to rickets. Int Orthop. Mar 5.
  2. 2.
    Schmorl G. (1909) Ergeb inn Med u Kinderheilk, 4, pp. 403–454.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fedotoff P A (1842) De oleo Jecoris Aselli, Diss. Leipsic,.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pliny the Elder (born Gaius Plinius Secundus, AD 23–79) Nat. Hist., Lib. 32, p. 27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Browne T (1663) The works of Sir Thomas Browne 1931. In: Keynes G (ed) Notes on the natural history of Norfolk, chiefly birds and fishes, circa. vol 5. Faber and Faber, London, p 385Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Percival T (1790) Percival’s essays, Ed. 4, 2:360,.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hufeland’s Journal (1822) 56:128.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schenck D (1822) J. d. pract. Heilk. 55:31, Part 6.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schutte D (1824) Archiv fur medizinche Erfahrung:79Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schenck. (1826) Neues Journal der practischen Arzneykunde und Wundarzneykunst, 62 III. Stuck p 3.26A.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    De V (1836) Schmidt’s Jahrb 5:147Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trousseau A (1868) Lectures on clinical medicine, delivered at the Hôtel-Dieu, Paris, 3rd edn. Translated by Sir John Cormack. New Sydenham Society, London, p 1872Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bland SJ (1889) Rickets in monkeys, lions, bears and birds. J Comparat Surg 10:1–29Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fraenkel E, Lorey A (1910) Archiv und Atlas der normalen und pathologischen Anatomie in typischen Rontgenbild. Lucas Grafe and Sillem, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lovett RW (1915) The roentgenographic appearances in rickets. JAMA 65:2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosen G (1975) The case of the consumptive conductor, or public health on a streetcar: a centennial tribute to Alfred F. Hess, MD. Am J Public Health 65:978Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hess AF, Unger LJ (1917) Prophylactic therapy for rickets in a Negro community. J Am Med Assoc 69:1583–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mellanby E (1918) The part played by an “accessory factor” in the production of experimental rickets. J Physiol 52:11–14Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mellanby E (1919) An experimental investigation on rickets. Lancet 1:407–412Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCollum EV, Simmonds N, Becker JE, Shipley PG (1922) Studies on experimental rickets XXI: an experimental demonstration of the existence of a vitamin which promotes calcium deposition. J Biol Chem 53:293–312Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kramer B, Casparis H, Howland J (1922) Ultraviolet radiation in rickets. Effect on the calcium and inorganic phosphorus concentration of the serum. Am J Dis Child 24:20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Powers GF, Park EA, Shipley PG, McCollum EV, Simmonds N (1921) The prevention of the development of rickets in rats by sunlight. In Proceedings of the American Child Hygiene Association Transactions of the 12th annual meeting, New Haven, CT, USA; pp. 74–91.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parkes EA (1923) Etiology of rickets. Physiol Rev 106–163:143–144Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sniadecki J D (1840) vol 1; 273–274 WarszawaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mozolowski W (1939) Jędrzej Sniadecki (1768–1838) on the cure of rickets. Nature 143.
  26. 26.
    Ekpe J (2009) The chemistry of light: the life and work of Theobald Adrian Palm (1848–1928). J Med Biogr 17:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hirsch A (1886) Handbook of geographical and historical pathology. The New Sydenham Society, London, pp 732–741Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Palm TA (1888) Letter to the editor. Br Med J 2:1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Owens I (1889) Reports of the Collective Investigation Committee of the British Medical Association. Geographical distribution of rickets, acute and subactute rheumatism, chorea and urinary calculus in the British Islands. Br Med J 1:113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Palm TA (1890) The geographical distribution and etiology of rickets. Practitioner 45:270–342Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rollier A (1923) Heliotherapy. Henry Frowde and Hodder & Stoughton, London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Raczynski J (1913) Recherches Experimentales sur le Manque D’action au Soleil Comme Cause du Rachitisme; C. R. Assoc. Internat. Pediatrie: Paris, France; pp. 308–309.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Buchholz E (1904) Ueber Lichthandlung der Rachitis und andere Kinderkrankheiten. In Verhandlungen der Gesellschaft fur Kinderheilkunde in der Abteilung fur Kinderheilkunde der 76 Versammlung der Gesellschaft Deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte in Breslau, Breslau, Germany; Volume 21, p. 116.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mills A (2013) The Nernst lamp. Electrical conductivity in non-metallic materials. Rittenhouse 24(1) Archived from the original on 17 July 2013Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Huldschinsky K (1919) Heilung von rachitis durch kunstliche hohensonne. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 45:712–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Huldschinsky K (1920) Die behandlung der rachitis durch ultraviolet bestrahlung. Ztschr f Orthop Chir 39:426Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Riedel G (1920) Die Erfolge der quartzlichtbestrahlung bei rachitis. Munchen Med Wochenschr 67:838Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Heraeus-Hanau H (1903) Über Quarzglas. Z Elektrochem 9:847–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schott O (1905) Eine Neue Ultra violett queck silber lampe. Uviollampe. Chem Zentralblatt, I:76–77Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schott O (1905) A new ultra-violet mercury lamp. Nature:513–514Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chick H, Dalyell EJ, Hume M, Mackay HMM, Henderson-Smith H, Wimberger H (1922) The aetiology of rickets in infants. Lancet 2:7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Medical Research Council (1923) Studies of rickets in Vienna. HMSO, London, pp 1919–1922Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hess AF. (1922) Influence of light in the prevention and cure of rickets. Lancet.;ii:367. Reprinted in: Hess AF. Collected writings. Vol 2. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas; 1936:5–14.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hess AF, Weinstock M (1923) A study of light waves in their relation to rickets. JAMA 80:687–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hess AF. (1925) The ultraviolet rays of the sun. JAMA.;84:1033. Reprinted in: Hess AF. Collected writings. Vol 2. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas; 1936:167–178.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hess AF, Weinstock M (1925) The antirachitic value of irradiated cholesterol and phytosterol. II. Further evidence of change in biological activity. J Biol Chem 64:181–191Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hess AF, Weinstock M (1924) Antirachitic properties imparted to inert fluids and to green vegetables by ultra-violet irradiation. J Biol Chem 62:301–313Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Windaus A, Hess A (1927) Sterine und Antirachitisches Vitamin. Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, Berlin, pp 175–184Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hess AF, Windaus A (1927) The development of marked activity in ergosterol following ultraviolet irradiations. Exp Biol Med 24:461–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Steenbock H (1924) The induction of growth promoting and calcifying properties in a ration by exposure to light. Science 60:224–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    WARF (2011) Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation.. Available online: Accessed July 2018
  52. 52.
    Schneider HA (1973) Steenbock H (1886–1967)—a biographical sketch. J Nutr 103:1233–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Steenbock H, Nelson MT (1924) Fat soluble vitamins XIX: the induction of calcifying properties in a rickets-producing ration by radiant energy. J Biol Chem 62:209–216Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Steenbock H, Black A (1925) The induction of growth promoting and calcifying properties in a ration by exposure to ultra-violet light. J Biol Chem 64:263–298Google Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Hernigou
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean Charles Auregan
    • 2
  • Arnaud Dubory
    • 1
  1. 1.Hôpital Henri MondorCreteilFrance
  2. 2.Hôpital Antoine BéclèreClamartFrance

Personalised recommendations