Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 861–867 | Cite as

The relevance of high-intensity zones in degenerative disc disease

  • Jason Pui Yin CheungEmail author
  • Keith Dip Kei Luk
Review

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to review the current understanding of high-intensity zones (HIZ) in the lumbar spine with particular attention to its imaging phenotype and clinical relevance.

Methods

A review was conducted of studies related to HIZ. Particular attention was made to imaging phenotypes and classification, and its relationship with discogenic low back pain (LBP).

Results

The most current classification system of HIZ is based on location (anterior and posterior), morphology (round, fissure, vertical, rim, or giant types), and its appearance on both T1- and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). HIZ are commonly manifested with disc degeneration. Hence, both conditions share similar risk factors such as the effect of frequent and prolonged disc loading. The clinical significance of HIZ however is not conclusive. Provocative discography is not sensitive (~ 70%) for eliciting a concordant pain response. Population-based studies have conflicting results regarding the prevalence (14–63%) of HIZ and its correlation with LBP.

Conclusions

HIZ are likely a risk factor for discogenic LBP. However, its etiology and pathophysiology are not well understood. Some clinical studies suggest a link between its occurrence and LBP. However, the results are not consistent as a result of studies which are underpowered and based on heterogeneous study populations, lacking control groups, and without standardized imaging phenotypes. HIZ may be an important pain biomarker that should be further studied. With more modern MRI technology and a detailed classification system, future large-scale population studies will improve our knowledge on its role in the disc degeneration cascade and development of LBP.

Keywords

High-intensity zones HIZ Lumbar spine Back pain Phenotype Disc degeneration MRI 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Andersson GB (1999) Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354:581–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dagenais S, Caro J, Haldeman S (2008) A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J 8:8–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deyo RA, Tsui-Wu YJ (1987) Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:264–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G, CBWGoGfCLB P (2006) Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J 15(Suppl 2):S192–S300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Thomas S (2006) Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ 332:1430–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang YG, Guo TM, Guo X, Wu SX (2009) Clinical diagnosis for discogenic low back pain. Int J Biol Sci 5:647–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carragee EJ, Barcohana B, Alamin T, van den Haak E (2004) Prospective controlled study of the development of lower back pain in previously asymptomatic subjects undergoing experimental discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1112–1117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carragee EJ, Don AS, Hurwitz EL, Cuellar JM, Carrino JA, Herzog R (2009) 2009 ISSLS prize winner: does discography cause accelerated progression of degeneration changes in the lumbar disc: a ten-year matched cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2338–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Aprill C, Bogduk N (1992) High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 65:361–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Neill C, Kurgansky M, Kaiser J, Lau W (2008) Accuracy of MRI for diagnosis of discogenic pain. Pain Physician 11:311–326Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, Patronas NJ, Wiesel SW (1990) Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol 72:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Gundry CR, Heithoff KB (1996) Lumbar disc high-intensity zone. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:79–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu SW, Haughton VM, Sether LA, Wagner M (1989) Comparison of MR and diskography in detecting radial tears of the anulus: a postmortem study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 10:1077–1081Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tsuji H, Hirano N, Ohshima H, Ishihara H, Terahata N, Motoe T (1993) Structural variation of the anterior and posterior anulus fibrosus in the development of human lumbar intervertebral disc. A risk factor for intervertebral disc rupture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Teraguchi M, Samartzis D, Hashizume H, Yamada H, Muraki S, Oka H, Cheung JP, Kagotani R, Iwahashi H, Tanaka S, Kawaguchi H, Nakamura K, Akune T, Cheung KM, Yoshimura N, Yoshida M (2016) Classification of high intensity zones of the lumbar spine and their association with other spinal MRI phenotypes: the Wakayama Spine Study. PLoS One 11:e0160111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ito M, Incorvaia KM, Yu SF, Fredrickson BE, Yuan HA, Rosenbaum AE (1998) Predictive signs of discogenic lumbar pain on magnetic resonance imaging with discography correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:1252–1258 discussion 1259-1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW (2004) Longitudinal study of vertebral type-1 end-plate changes on MR of the lumbar spine. Eur Radiol 14:1574–1581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams MA, Roughley PJ (2006) What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2151–2161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Carragee EJ, Paragioudakis SJ, Khurana S (2000) 2000 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies: lumbar high-intensity zone and discography in subjects without low back problems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:2987–2992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC (2000) Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J 9:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, Moore R, Fraser RD (1992) Annular tears and disc degeneration in the lumbar spine. A post-mortem study of 135 discs. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 74:678–682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ricketson R, Simmons JW, Hauser BO (1996) The prolapsed intervertebral disc. The high-intensity zone with discography correlation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:2758–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sharma A, Pilgram T, Wippold FJ 2nd. (2009) Association between annular tears and disk degeneration: a longitudinal study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 30:500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schmidt TA, An HS, Lim TH, Nowicki BH, Haughton VM (1998) The stiffness of lumbar spinal motion segments with a high-intensity zone in the anulus fibrosus. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:2167–2173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Braithwaite I, White J, Saifuddin A, Renton P, Taylor BA (1998) Vertebral end-plate (Modic) changes on lumbar spine MRI: correlation with pain reproduction at lumbar discography. Eur Spine J 7:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sandhu HS, Sanchez-Caso LP, Parvataneni HK, Cammisa FP Jr, Girardi FP, Ghelman B (2000) Association between findings of provocative discography and vertebral endplate signal changes as seen on MRI. J Spinal Disord 13:438–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maatta JH, Wadge S, MacGregor A, Karppinen J, Williams FM (2015) ISSLS prize winner: vertebral endplate (Modic) change is an independent risk factor for episodes of severe and disabling low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40:1187–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Modic MT (2007) Modic type 1 and type 2 changes. J Neurosurg Spine 6:150–151 discussion 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mok FP, Samartzis D, Karppinen J, Fong DY, Luk KD, Cheung KM (2016) Modic changes of the lumbar spine: prevalence, risk factors, and association with disc degeneration and low back pain in a large-scale population-based cohort. Spine J 16:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kang CH, Kim YH, Lee SH, Derby R, Kim JH, Chung KB, Sung DJ (2009) Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict concordant pain provocation during provocative disc injection? Skelet Radiol 38:877–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jensen MC, Brant-Zawadzki MN, Obuchowski N, Modic MT, Malkasian D, Ross JS (1994) Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine in people without back pain. N Engl J Med 331:69–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Park KW, Song KS, Chung JY, Choi JM, Lee JH, Lee CK, Chang BS (2007) High-intensity zone on L-spine MRI: clinical relevance and association with trauma history. Asian Spine J 1:38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Peng B, Hou S, Wu W, Zhang C, Yang Y (2006) The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain. Eur Spine J 15:583–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rankine JJ, Gill KP, Hutchinson CE, Ross ER, Williamson JB (1999) The clinical significance of the high-intensity zone on lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1913–1919 discussion 1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buirski G, Silberstein M (1993) The symptomatic lumbar disc in patients with low-back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in both a symptomatic and control population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18:1808–1811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Takatalo J, Karppinen J, Niinimaki J, Taimela S, Mutanen P, Sequeiros RB, Nayha S, Jarvelin MR, Kyllonen E, Tervonen O (2012) Association of modic changes, Schmorl’s nodes, spondylolytic defects, high-intensity zone lesions, disc herniations, and radial tears with low back symptom severity among young Finnish adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:1231–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stadnik TW, Lee RR, Coen HL, Neirynck EC, Buisseret TS, Osteaux MJ (1998) Annular tears and disk herniation: prevalence and contrast enhancement on MR images in the absence of low back pain or sciatica. Radiology 206:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Alyas F, Connell D, Saifuddin A (2008) Upright positional MRI of the lumbar spine. Clin Radiol 63:1035–1048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saifuddin A, Braithwaite I, White J, Taylor BA, Renton P (1998) The value of lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in the demonstration of anular tears. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23:453–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hebelka H, Hansson T (2013) HIZ's relation to axial load and low back pain: investigated with axial loaded MRI and pressure controlled discography. Eur Spine J 22:734–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Canbay S, Ataker Y, Canbulat N, Kabaoglu ZU, Oktenoglu T, Sasani M, Ozer AF (2015) Effect of posterior dynamic instrumentation on high-intensity zone in lumbar degenerative disc disease. Turk Neurosurg 25:578–585Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chen JY, Ding Y, Lv RY, Liu QY, Huang JB, Yang ZH, Liu SL (2011) Correlation between MR imaging and discography with provocative concordant pain in patients with low back pain. Clin J Pain 27:125–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mitra D, Cassar-Pullicino VN, McCall IW (2004) Longitudinal study of high intensity zones on MR of lumbar intervertebral discs. Clin Radiol 59:1002–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang HQ, Samartzis D (2014) Clarifying the nomenclature of intervertebral disc degeneration and displacement: from bench to bedside. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 7:1293–1298Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yang H, Liu H, Li Z, Zhang K, Wang J, Wang H, Zheng Z (2015) Low back pain associated with lumbar disc herniation: role of moderately degenerative disc and annulus fibrous tears. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:1634–1644Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Liu C, Cai HX, Zhang JF, Ma JJ, Lu YJ, Fan SW (2014) Quantitative estimation of the high-intensity zone in the lumbar spine: comparison between the symptomatic and asymptomatic population. Spine J 14:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hancock M, Maher C, Macaskill P, Latimer J, Kos W, Pik J (2012) MRI findings are more common in selected patients with acute low back pain than controls? Eur Spine J 21:240–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and TraumatologyThe University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary HospitalHong Kong SARChina

Personalised recommendations