Sagittal alignment assessment after short-segment lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disease
- 154 Downloads
To investigate whether differences in spinopelvic parameters, and especially spinopelvic alignment, could be associated with adjacent segment disease (ASD) or pseudarthrosis after short-segment lumbar fusion.
Retrospective study of patients offered mono- or bisegmental transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium cages, due to degenerative disease. Of 419 patients, 32 (7.6%) presented pseudarthrosis (nonunion group), 29 (6.9%) developed symptomatic ASD (ASD group), and 358 patients (85.5%) showed evidence of uncomplicated fusion (control group). Standard spinopelvic parameters were measured in all patients before and after surgery. The differences of the values within the parameters (Δ values) were also calculated. A comparative analysis within and among groups was performed. Patients were also analyzed by cage characteristics (large vs small, titanium vs PEEK).
All studied parameters changed significantly after surgery both in the control and ASD group, while in the nonunion group, only LL and PI-LL changed significantly (PI-LL increased from 10 ± 11° to 14 ± 10°, p = 0.008). Patients in the nonunion group presented greater SS before and after surgery, greater PI-LL after surgery, and higher PI, while ASD patients presented greater absolute mean ΔPT value. Age, size, and type of cage were not related to fusion, nonunion, or ASD.
Greater SS, greater PI, and a PI-LL mismatch greater than 10° are associated with failed bony fusion, while ASD is related to a greater difference between the pre-operative and post-operative values of PT. Neither the type nor the size of cage seem to have a significant impact on either solid bony fusion, nonunion, or ASD rates. Thus, we recommend on the study of patients’ sagittal alignment in the pre-operative setting even when treating patients with short-segment lumbar interbody fusion.
KeywordsLumbar interbody fusion PEEK Titanium Degenerative disc disease Disc herniation Sagittal alignment
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
- 3.Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05 Google Scholar
- 6.Matsumoto T, Okuda S, Maeno T, Yamashita T, Yamasaki R, Sugiura T, Iwasaki M (2017) Spinopelvic sagittal imbalance as a risk factor for adjacent-segment disease after single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 26(4):435–440. https://doi.org/10.3171/2016.9.SPINE16232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chen XL, Guan L, Liu YZ, Yang JC, Wang WL, Hai Y (2016) Interspinous dynamic stabilization adjacent to fusion versus double-segment fusion for treatment of lumbar degenerative disease with a minimum follow-up of three years. Int Orthop 40(6):1275–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3199-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lee JC, Kim Y, Soh JW, Shin BJ (2014) Risk factors of adjacent segment disease requiring surgery after lumbar spinal fusion: comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(5):E339–E345. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000000164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Le Huec JC, Faundez A, Dominguez D, Hoffmeyer P, Aunoble S (2015) Evidence showing the relationship between sagittal balance and clinical outcomes in surgical treatment of degenerative spinal diseases: a literature review. Int Orthop 39(1):87–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2516-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Lafage V, Ames C, Schwab F, Klineberg E, Akbarnia B, Smith J, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton D, Hart R, Hostin R, Shaffrey C, Wood K, Bess S, International Spine Study G (2012) Changes in thoracic kyphosis negatively impact sagittal alignment after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy: a comprehensive radiographic analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37(3):E180–E187. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318225b926 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Hara M, Nishimura Y, Nakajima Y, Umebayashi D, Takemoto M, Yamamoto Y, Haimoto S (2015) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disorders: mini-open TLIF and corrective TLIF. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 55(7):547–556. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.oa.2014-0402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Pelissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-005-0984-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Cho W, Mason JR, Smith JS, Shimer AL, Wilson AS, Shaffrey CI, Shen FH, Novicoff WM, Fu KM, Heller JE, Arlet V (2013) Failure of lumbopelvic fixation after long construct fusions in patients with adult spinal deformity: clinical and radiographic risk factors: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(4):445–453. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.6.SPINE121129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Schwab FJ, Blondel B, Bess S, Hostin R, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Boachie-Adjei O, Burton DC, Akbarnia BA, Mundis GM, Ames CP, Kebaish K, Hart RA, Farcy JP, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2013) Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity: a prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(13):E803–E812. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318292b7b9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Mehta VA, Amin A, Omeis I, Gokaslan ZL, Gottfried ON (2015) Implications of spinopelvic alignment for the spine surgeon. Neurosurgery 76(Suppl 1):S42–S56; discussion S56. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000462077.50830.1a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Nemoto O, Asazuma T, Yato Y, Imabayashi H, Yasuoka H, Fujikawa A (2014) Comparison of fusion rates following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using polyetheretherketone cages or titanium cages with transpedicular instrumentation. Eur Spine J 23(10):2150–2155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3466-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Tanida S, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B, Masamoto K, Takahashi Y, Nakayama T, Matsuda S (2016) Vertebral endplate cyst as a predictor of nonunion after lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone cages. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 41(20):E1216–E1222. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Wrangel CV, Karakoyun A, Buchholz KM, Suss O, Kombos T, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P, Czabanka M (2017) Fusion rates of intervertebral Polyetheretherketone and titanium cages without bone grafting in posterior interbody lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative lumbar instability. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 78(6):556–560. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1604284 CrossRefGoogle Scholar