Advertisement

Functional recovery of daily living and sports activities after cosmetic bilateral tibia lengthening

  • Kun-Bo Park
  • Yoon Hae Kwak
  • Jung Woo Lee
  • Byoung Kyu Park
  • Hoon Park
  • Dong Hoon Lee
Original Paper
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The aims of this study were to evaluate the recovery of physical function and to investigate whether there are factors that adversely affect functional recovery after cosmetic bilateral lengthening of the tibia.

Methods

One hundred twenty-five healthy individuals who had undergone bilateral cosmetic tibia lengthening by the lengthening and then nail (LATN) method, lengthening over intramedullary nail (LON) method or intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD) were included in the study. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the Sports Activity Rating Scale (SARS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form and patient self-reported ability scores.

Results

SARS and IKDC scores decreased at post-operative one year and improved significantly at post-operative two years. SARS and IKDC scores recovered similarly to pre-operative levels. Average patient self-reported ability scores at post-operative two years were 94.6 and 89.9 for daily living and light sports, respectively. However, the average score for moderate-to-strenuous sports was 68.1 and 39 patients (31.2%) recorded below average score for the moderate-to-strenuous sports.

Conclusions

Patients who had undergone bilateral cosmetic tibial lengthening may expect almost full recovery of daily and light sports activities at post-operativetwo years. However, several patients may feel some limitation in moderate-to-strenuous sports activities.

Keywords

Bone lengthening Tibia Recovery of function Activities of daily living Sports 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional review board at our institution (4-2015-0722).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

264_2018_4159_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (106 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 105 kb)
264_2018_4159_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (100 kb)
ESM 2 (PDF 100 kb)
264_2018_4159_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (21 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 21 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Catagni MA (2005) Cosmetic bilateral leg lengthening: experience of 54 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1402–1405.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16468 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park HW, Yang KH, Lee KS, Joo SY, Kwak YH, Kim HW (2008) Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail with use of the ilizarov external fixator for idiopathic short stature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1970–1978.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00897 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Novikov KI, Subramanyam KN, Muradisinov SO, Novikova OS, Kolesnikova ES (2014) Cosmetic lower limb lengthening by ilizarov apparatus: what are the risks? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3549–3556.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3782-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elbatrawy Y, Ragab IMA (2015) Safe cosmetic leg lengthening for short stature: long-term outcomes. Orthopedics 38(7):e552–e560.  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20150701-51 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Motallebi Zadeh N, Mortazavi SH, Khaki S, Heidari K, Karbasi A, Ostad Rahimi S (2014) Bilateral tibial lengthening over the nail: our experience of 143 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:1219–1225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2069-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Emara K, Farouk A, Diab R (2011) Ilizarov technique of lengthening and then nailing for height increase. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 19:204–8. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee DH, Ryu KJ, Song HR, Han SH (2014) Complications of the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD) in distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:3852–3859.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-3547-4 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rozbruch SR, Kleinman D, Fragomen AT, Ilizarov S (2008) Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2923–2932.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0509-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burghardt RD, Manzotti A, Bhave A, Paley D, Herzenberg JE (2016) Tibial lengthening over intramedullary nails: a matched case comparison with Ilizarov tibial lengthening. Bone Joint Res 5:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000577 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo Q, Zhang T, Zheng Y, Feng S, Ma X, Zhao F (2012) Tibial lengthening over an intramedullary nail in patients with short stature or leg-length discrepancy: a comparative study. Int Orthop 36:179–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1246-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calder PR, Laubscher M, Goodier WD (2017) The role of the intramedullary implant in limb lengthening. Injury 48:S52–S58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun X-T, Easwar TR, Manesh S, Ryu JH, Song SH, Kim SJ, Song HR (2011) Complications and outcome of tibial lengthening using the Ilizarov method with or without a supplementary intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:782–787.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B6.25521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xu WG (2017) Comparison of intramedullary nail versus conventional Ilizarov method for lower limb lengthening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop Surg 9:159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12330 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhave A, Shabtai L, Woelber E, Apelyan A, Paley D, Herzenberg JE (2017) Muscle strength and knee range of motion after femoral lengthening. Acta Orthop 88:179–184.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1262678 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stanitski CL (2004) Limb lengthening for stature response to commentary. J Pediatr Orthop 24(5):593–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barker KL, Lamb SE, Simpson HRW (2010) Recovery of muscle strength and power after limb-lengthening surgery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:384–388.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watts J (2004) China’ s cosmetic surgery craze. Lancet 363:9413–9413Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams P, Simpson H, Kenwright J, Goldspink G (2001) Muscle fibre damage and regeneration resulting from surgical limb distraction. Cells Tissues Organs 169:395–400.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000047907 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Young NL, Davis RJ, Bell DF, Redmond DM (1993) Electromyographic and nerve conduction changes after tibial lengthening by the Ilizarov method. J Pediatr Orthop 13:473–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Simpson AHRW, Halliday J, Hamilton DF, Smith M, Mills K (2013) Limb lengthening and peripheral nerve function—factors associated with deterioration of conduction. Acta Orthop 84:579–584.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2013.859418 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kaljumäe U, Märtson A, Haviko T, Hänninen O (1995) The effect of lengthening of the femur on the extensors of the knee. An electromyographic study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Makarov M, Birch J, Samchukov M (2009) The role of variable muscle adaptation to limb lengthening in the development of joint contractures: an experimental study in the goat. J Pediatr Orthop 29:175–181.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181981fcf CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holm I, Steen H, Ludvigsen P, Bjerkreim I (1995) Unchanged muscle function after bilateral femoral lengthening. A prospective study of 9 patients with a 2-year follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 66:258–260.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679508995537 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Phillips KA (1999) Body dysmorphic disorder and depression: theoretical considerations and treatment strategies. Psychiatr Q 70:313–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mooar LA (1989) A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders. Clin Orthop Relat Res 246:238–249Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Higgins LD, Taylor MK, Park D, Ghodadra N, Marchant M, Pietrobon R et al (2007) Reliability and validity of the international knee documentation committee (IKDC) subjective knee form. Joint Bone Spine 74:594–599.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.036 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 250:81–104Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ryu KJ, Kim BH, Hwang JH, Kim HW, Lee DH (2016) Reamed intramedullary nailing has an adverse effect on bone regeneration during the distraction phase in tibial lengthening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474:816–824.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4613-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Alrabai HM, Gesheff MG, Conway JD (2017) Use of internal lengthening nails in post-traumatic sequelae. Int Orthop 41:1915–1923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eidelman M, Jauergui JJ, Standard SC, Paley D, Hezenberg JE (2016) Hip stability during lengthening in children with congenital femoral deficiency. Int Orthop 40:2619–2625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Children’s HospitalYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym Sacred Heart HospitalHallym University College of MedicineAnyangSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations