The effects of rotator cuff tear on shoulder proprioception
- 156 Downloads
To evaluate the effects of rotator cuff tear (RCT) and its severity on shoulder proprioception.
We studied 132 consecutive patients (67 M-65 F; mean age ± SD, 66.03 ± 9.04; range, 43–78) who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Tear size was determined intra-operatively. The control group included 82 subjects (38 M-44 F; mean age ± SD, 65.87 ± 8.06; range, 41–75) with no RCT. All participants, wearing an eye mask, were submitted to the evaluation of the joint position sense (JPS) at 30°, 60°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of shoulder forward flexion during the sitting position, using a digital inclinometer securely attached to the subject’s arm using hook-and-loop straps. The passive placement and active replacement method was used; the order of the tested angles was randomly selected. The entire test was repeated three times. The error score, by averaging the three trials, was measured as the absolute difference between the target angle and the observed angle. Statistics were performed.
The intraclass correlation coefficient for all degrees of flexion movement measured was > 0.90, exhibiting a very high correlation. We found significant differences between cases and controls regarding the results of joint position sense error at all measurements (p < 0.05). According to RCT size, we found significant differences between groups at 30° (F = 27.27, p < 0.001), 90° (F = 5.37, p = 0.006), 120° (F = 10.76, p < 0.001), and 150° (F = 30.93, p < 0.001) of shoulder flexion; in details, patients with massive RCT showed greater absolute error value than those with both small and large RCT at 30°, 90°, 120°, and 150° of shoulder flexion (p < 0.05).
RCT provokes an alteration of shoulder proprioception, evaluated as the loss of joint position sense, and the impairment is related to tear severity.
KeywordsShoulder proprioception Joint position sense Rotator cuff tear and proprioception Passive/active method for joint position sense Massive rotator cuff tear and shoulder proprioception
Compliance with ethical standards
All participants signed an informed consent form in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. According to the law of our country, this study does not need any ethics committee approval.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
- 9.Gumina S, Arceri V, Fagnani C, Venditto T, Catalano C, Candela V, Nisticò L (2015) Subacromial space width: does overuse or genetics play a greater role in determining it? An MRI study on elderly twins. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(20):1647–1652. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.O.00379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Gumina S, Candela V, Passaretti D, Venditto T, Carbone S, Arceri V, Giannicola G (2014) Intensity and distribution of shoulder pain in patients with different sized postero-superior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elb Surg 23(6):807–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2013.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Relph N, Herrington L (2016) The effect of conservatıvely treated a ACL ınjury on knee joint position sense. Int J Sports Phys Ther 11:536–543Google Scholar
- 18.Brunt D, Andersen JC, Huntsman B, Reinhert LB, Thorell AL, Sterling JC (1992) Postural responses to lateral perturbation in healthy subjects and ankle sprain patients. Med Sci Sport Exerc 171-176(346):24Google Scholar
- 21.Rokito AS, Birdzell MG, Cuomo F, Di Paola MJ, Zuckerman JD (2010) Recovery of shoulder strength and proprioception after open surgery for recurrent anterior instability: a comparison of two surgical techniques. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19(4):564–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Snyder SJ (2002) Arthroscopic classification of rotator cuff lesions and surgical decision making. In: Shoulder arthroscopy. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; p. 204. ISBN:0781735017, 9780781735018Google Scholar
- 27.Portney LG, Watkins MP (2000) Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 28.Martin J, Jessell T (1991) Modality coding in the somatic sensory system. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T (eds) Principles of neural science. Prentice-Hall International Inc, London, p 341e52Google Scholar
- 32.Ghez C (1991) Voluntary movement. In: Kandel E, Schwartz J, Jessell T (eds) Principles of neural science. Prentice-Hall International Inc., London, p 609e25Google Scholar
- 33.Milner TE, Hinder MR, Franklin DW (2007) How is somatosensory information used to adapt to changes in the mechanical environment? Comput Neurosci Theor Insights Brain Funct 165:363e72Google Scholar
- 46.Chu JC, Kane EJ, Arnold BL, Gansneder BM (2002) The effect of a neoprene shoulder stabilizer on active joint-reposition sense in subjects with stable and unstable shoulders. J Athl Train 37:141–145Google Scholar
- 52.Vafadar AK, Côté JN, Archambault PS (2016) Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability and validity of three measurement methods for shoulder position sense. J Sport Rehabil 19:2014–0309Google Scholar
- 57.Paolucci T, Zangrando F, Piccinini G, Sciarra F, Pallotta R, Mannocci A, la Torre G, Bini F, Marinozzi F, Gumina S, Padua L, Saraceni VM (2016) A new neurocognitive interpretation of shoulder position sense during reaching: unexpected competence in the measurement of extracorporeal space. Biomed Res Int 2016:9065495. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9065495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Dover G, Powers ME (2003) Reliability of joint position sense and force-reproduction measures during internal and external rotation of the shoulder. J Athletic Training 38(4):304–310Google Scholar
- 66.Amaral DG (2013) The functional organization of perception and movement. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM, Siegelbaum SA, Hudspect AJ (eds) Principles of neural science. 5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York ISBN-13: 978–0071390118Google Scholar
- 69.Salles JI, Cossich VR, Amaral MV, Monteiro MT, Cagy M, Motta G, Velasques B, Piedade R, Ribeiro P (2013) Electrophysiological correlates of the threshold to detection of passive motion: an investigation in professional volleyball athletes with and without atrophy of the infraspinatus muscle. Biomed Res Int 2013:634891. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/634891 CrossRefGoogle Scholar