Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 97–101 | Cite as

Revision of ASR hip arthroplasty: analysis of two hundred and ninety six recalled patients at seven years

  • Giovanni Benelli
  • Merildo Maritato
  • Pierpaolo Cerulli MarianiEmail author
  • Francesco Sasso
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to present an algorithm for the evaluation of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.

Methods

From November 2004 to May 2010, there were performed 296 operations: 245 total hip arthroplasty and 51 resurfacing arthroplasty with the ASR DePuy system. In April 2010, there was the first Medical Device Alert regarding all MoM hip replacements in the UK and in August 2010, DePuy recall started worldwide. In March 2012, we started our recall. All patients were invited to undergo clinical investigation, X-ray evaluations, and blood chrome and cobalt level determination. For a short period of time, there were performed second level exams and subsequently, we carried out MARS MRI hip study to all symptomatic patients and there was evidence of ALVAL lesions.

Results

To the patients with ALVAL lesions were proposed surgical hip revision while the others frequent follow-up controls. One hundred patients underwent hip surgical revision.

Conclusions

We recommend constant MoM THA patients monitoring and early revision if necessary.

Keywords

Metal-on-metal Total hip arthroplasty Adverse reaction to metal debris Aseptic lymphocytic-dominated vasculitis associated lesions Articular surface replacement Metal artifact reduction sequence magnetic resonance imaging 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Tibrewal S, Sabah S, Henckel J, Hart A (2014) The effect of a manufacturer recall on the threshold to revise a metal-on-metal hip. Int Orthop 38:2017–2020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akisue T (2017) Is metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty still an alternative? Commentary on an article by Tobias Reiner, MD, et all. “MRI Findings in Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years”. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(18):e101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ansari JS, Matharu GS, Pandit H (2018) Metal-on-metal hips: current status. Orthop Trauma 32(1):54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liow MHL, Kwon YM (2017) Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: risk factors for pseudotumours and clinical systematic evaluation. Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. Int Orthop 41(5):885–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and large-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92(1):38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sofka CM, Ho ST, Peters LE, Salvati EA (2004) Magnetic resonance imaging after total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of periprosthetic soft tissue. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(9):1947–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohaddes M, Cnudde P, Rolfson O, Wall A, Kärrholm J (2017) Use of dual-mobility cup in revision hip arthroplasty reduces the risk for further dislocation: analysis of seven hundred and ninety one first-time revisions performed due to dislocation, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Int Orthop 41(3):583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laura AD, Hothi H, Battisti C, Cerquiglini A, Henckel J, Skinner J, Hart A (2017) Wear of dual-mobility cups: a review article. Int Orthop 41(3):625–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang X, Wang J, Xiao J, Shi Z (2016) Early failures of porous tantalum osteonecrosis implants: a case series with retrieval analysis. Int Orthop 40(9):1827–1834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D, Roubineau F, Flouzat Lachaniette CH (2017) Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop 41(3):481–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hothi HS, Berber R, Whittaker RK, Blunn GW, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2016) The relationship between cobalt/chromium ratios and the high prevalence of head-stem junction corrosion in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 31(5):1123–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Su EP (2016) Metal-on-metal problems: diagnosis and management. Semin Arthroplast 27(4):244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Atrey A, Hart A, Hussain N, Waite J, Shepherd AJ, Young S (2016) 601 metal-on-metal total hip replacements with 36 mm heads a 5 minimum year follow up: Levels of ARMD remain low despite a comprehensive screening program. J Orthop 14(1):108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Adams JB, Satterwhite KL (2016) Adverse reactions to metal on metal are not exclusive to large heads in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 474(2):432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Affatato S, Comitini S, Fosco M, Toni A, Tigani D (2016) Radiological identification of Zweymüller-type femoral stem prosthesis in revision cases. Int Orthop 40(11):2261–2269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Esposito CI, Wright TM, Goodman SB, Berry DJ (2014) What is the trouble with trunnions? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(12):3652–3658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Elmallah RK, Diedrich A, Le S, Thomas M, Mont MA (2016) Trunnionosis in total hip arthroplasty: a review. J Orthop Traumatol 17(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berstock JR, Whitehouse MR, Duncan CP (2018) Trunnion corrosion: what surgeons need to know in 2018. Bone Joint J 100-B(1 Supple A):44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Huang JF, Shen JJ, Chen JJ, Zheng Y, Du WX, Liu FC (2015) New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures. Int Orthop 39(9):1765–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P, Lord J, Nargol AV (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1011–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopaedic and Traumatology DepartmentSanto Stefano Hospital, Azienda USL Toscana CentroPratoItaly

Personalised recommendations