International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 467–473 | Cite as

Curettage, phenolization, and cementation in paediatric Ewing’s sarcoma with a complete radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

  • Khodamorad Jamshidi
  • Mehdi Ramezan Shirazi
  • Abolfazl Bagherifard
  • Alireza MirzaeiEmail author
Original Paper



Although wide resection is the standard treatment for Ewing’s sarcoma (ES), it has complications especially in children. In this study, we compared the oncologic and functional outcomes of wide resection with extended curettage and local adjuvant therapy (phenolization and cementation), as a less extensive surgery for paediatric ES with a complete radiologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.


Children aged ≤ ten years, with ES of non-expendable long-bones and complete radiologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, were included in this case-control study. Twenty-six patients were treated with extended curettage and local adjuvant therapy (case group) and 17 were managed with wide resection (control group). The average follow-up period was 60.1 ± 28.7 months (range 30–168 months). Functional outcome was assessed with the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system.


Three local recurrences (11.5%) and three distant metastases (11.5%) were observed in the case group. Two local recurrences (11.7%) and two metastases (11.7%) were recorded in the control group. The rate of local recurrence was not statistically different between the two study groups (p = 0.668). The rate of metastasis was not statistically different between the two study groups as well (p = 0.668). The complication rates were 15% in the case group and 53% in the control group (p = 0.005). The mean MSTS score was 98.3% and 74% in the case and control group, respectively (p < 0.001).


The oncologic outcome of extended curettage and local adjuvant therapy in paediatric ES with complete radiological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is comparable to wide resection, yet it offers considerably better functional results.


Ewing’s sarcoma Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Wide resection Curettage Paediatrics 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1.
    Ewing J (1921) Diffuse endothelioma of bone. Proc New York Path 21:17–24Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdel-Mota’al MM, Katchy K, Mallur A, Ahmad F, El-Alfy B (2008) Management of unicameral bone cyst of proximal femur: experience of 14 cases and review of literature. Kuwait Med J 40:202–210Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Canale ST, Beaty JH (2012) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Elsevier/Mosby, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ozaki T (2015) Diagnosis and treatment of Ewing sarcoma of the bone: a review article. J Orthop Sci 20(2):250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    LaRue SM, Wrigley RH, Powers B (1987) A review of the effects of radiation therapy on bone. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 28(1):17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cao X, Wu X, Frassica D, Yu B, Pang L, Xian L, Wan M, Lei W, Armour M, Tryggestad E (2011) Irradiation induces bone injury by damaging bone marrow microenvironment for stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(4):1609–1614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scurr M, Judson I (2006) How to treat the Ewing’s family of sarcomas in adult patients. Oncologist 11(1):65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Obata H, Ueda T, Kawai A, Ishii T, Ozaki T, Abe S, Tanaka K, Tsuchiya H, Matsumine A, Yabe H (2007) Clinical outcome of patients with Ewing sarcoma family of tumors of bone in Japan. Cancer 109(4):767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verma V, Denniston KA, Lin CJ, Lin C (2017) A comparison of pediatric vs. adult patients with the Ewing sarcoma family of tumors. Front Oncol 7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gaspar N, Hawkins DS, Dirksen U, Lewis IJ, Ferrari S, Le Deley M-C, Kovar H, Grimer R, Whelan J, Claude L (2015) Ewing sarcoma: current management and future approaches through collaboration. J Clin Oncol 33(27):3036–3046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aghighi M, Boe J, Rosenberg J, Von Eyben R, Gawande RS, Petit P, Sethi TK, Sharib J, Marina NM, DuBois SG (2016) Three-dimensional radiologic assessment of chemotherapy response in Ewing sarcoma can be used to predict clinical outcome. Radiology 280(3):905–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oberlin O, Patte C, Demeocq F, Lacombe M, Brunat-Mentigny M, Demaille M-C, Tron P, Bui BNg, Lemerle J (1985) The response to initial chemotherapy as a prognostic factor in localized Ewing’s sarcoma. Eur J Cancer 21 (4):463–467Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Juergens C, Weston C, Lewis I, Whelan J, Paulussen M, Oberlin O, Michon J, Zoubek A, Juergens H, Craft A (2006) Safety assessment of intensive induction with vincristine, ifosfamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide (VIDE) in the treatment of Ewing tumors in the EURO-EWING 99 clinical trial. Pediatr Blood Cancer 47(1):22–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nishino M, Jagannathan JP, Ramaiya NH, Van den Abbeele AD (2010) Revised RECIST guideline version 1.1: what oncologists want to know and what radiologists need to know. Am J Roentgenol 195(2):281–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92(3):205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mittag F, Leichtle C, Kieckbusch I, Wolburg H, Rudert M, Kluba T, Leichtle U (2013) Cytotoxic effect and tissue penetration of phenol for adjuvant treatment of giant cell tumours. Oncol Lett 5(5):1595–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jamshidi K, Bahrabadi M, Mirzaei A (2017) Long-term results of osteoarticular allograft reconstruction in children with distal femoral bone tumors. Arch Bone Joint Surg 5(5):296Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wunder JS, Paulian G, Huvos AG, Heller G, Meyers PA, Healey JH (1998) The histological response to chemotherapy as a predictor of the oncological outcome of operative treatment of Ewing sarcoma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(7):1020–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McTiernan AM, Cassoni AM, Driver D, Michelagnoli MP, Kilby AM, Whelan JS (2006) Improving outcomes after relapse in Ewing’s sarcoma: analysis of 114 patients from a single institution. Sarcoma.
  20. 20.
    Casey DA, Wexler LH, Merchant MS, Chou AJ, Merola PR, Price AP, Meyers PA (2009) Irinotecan and temozolomide for Ewing sarcoma: the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience. Pediatr Blood Cancer 53(6):1029–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wagner LM, McAllister N, Goldsby RE, Rausen AR, McNall-Knapp RY, McCarville MB, Albritton K (2007) Temozolomide and intravenous irinotecan for treatment of advanced Ewing sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 48(2):132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bernstein M, Kovar H, Paulussen M, Randall RL, Schuck A, Teot LA, Juergensg H (2006) Ewing’s sarcoma family of tumors: current management. Oncologist 11(5):503–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bellan DG, Jesus-Garcia Filho R, Garcia JG, de Toledo PM, Viola DCM, Schoedl MF, Petrilli AS (2012) Ewing’s sarcoma: epidemiology and prognosis for patients treated at the Pediatric Oncology Institute, IOP-GRAACC-UNIFESP. Rev Bras Ortop 47(4):446–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rastogi S, Kumar A, Gupta H, Khan SA, Bakhshi S (2010) Short-term followup after surgical treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma. Indian J Orthop 44(4):384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Do Kim J, Kim TH, Chung SH (2013) Long-term results of Ewing’s sarcoma--in a single institution. J Cancer Ther 4(1):323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bacci G, Ferrari S, Longhi A, Donati D, De Paolis M, Forni C, Versari M, Setola E, Briccoli A, Barbieri E (2003) Therapy and survival after recurrence of Ewing’s tumors: the Rizzoli experience in 195 patients treated with adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 1979 to 1997. Ann Oncol 14(11):1654–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Albergo J, Gaston C, Laitinen M, Darbyshire A, Jeys L, Sumathi V, Parry M, Peake D, Carter S, Tillman R (2016) Ewing’s sarcoma. Bone Joint J 98(8):1138–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kadhim M, Womer RB, Dormans JP (2017) Surgical treatment of pelvic sarcoma in children: outcomes for twenty six patients. Int Orthop 41(10):2149–2159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    McCarville MB (2009) PET-CT imaging in pediatric oncology. Cancer Imag 9(1):35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Khodamorad Jamshidi
    • 1
  • Mehdi Ramezan Shirazi
    • 1
  • Abolfazl Bagherifard
    • 1
  • Alireza Mirzaei
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Shafa Orthopedic HospitalIran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations