Coracohumeral index and coracoglenoid inclination as predictors for different types of degenerative subscapularis tendon tears
- 81 Downloads
To define and compare the coracohumeral index (CHI) and coracoglenoid inclination (CGI) in patients with different types of the subscapularis tendon tears.
Patients were divided into two groups: articular-sided lesion group (group A) and bursal-sided lesion group (group B). All the patients were examined using a 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging scanner pre-operatively. The morphometric parameters of the coracoids, including the coracohumeral distance (CHD), CHI, and CGI, were measured on MRI.
There were 165 (70.2%) and 70 (29.8%) patients in groups A and B, respectively. There was no significant difference in the average CHD (7.98 ± 1.7 mm vs 7.82 ± 2.1 mm, respectively) and CGI (50.5° ± 16.6° vs 44.9° ± 17.4°, respectively; P = 0.427) between the two groups. Conversely, there was a significant difference in the CHI between them (0.32 ± 0.08 vs 0.57 ± 0.11, respectively; P = 0.0001). According to the CHI and CGI, the coracoid process was divided into three types, and nearly half of the patients (46.8%) had standard coracoids with a hook tip, which are vulnerable to injury on the articular side. However, with overlapping coracoids and hook tips, the patients (16.2%) tended to experience injury on the bursal side. There was a significant difference in the incidence of articular or bursal side tear between the two groups.
The CHI and CGI are potential valuable predictors of the types of degenerative subscapularis tendon tears. With standard hook coracoids, the lesions tend to appear on the articular side initially; otherwise, with overlapping hook coracoids, the subscapularis tendon tears are commonly seen on the bursal side.
KeywordsSubscapularis Rotator cuff Coracoid impingement Coracoid type Shoulder arthroscopy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This retrospective study protocol was approved by institutional review board (IRB) of General Hospital of People’s Liberation Army, and written informed consents were obtained from all study participants.
- 5.Narasimhan R, Shamse K, Nash C, Dhingra D, Kennedy S (2016) Prevalence of subscapularis tears and accuracy of shoulder ultrasound in pre-operative diagnosis, Int Orthop. 40(5):975–979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-3043-9
- 6.Harada Y, Yokoya S, Akiyama Y, Mochizuki Y, Ochi M, Adachi N (2018) Bone mineralization changes of the glenoid in shoulders with symptomatic rotator cuff tear, Int Orthop. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4004-x
- 7.Ryu HY, Song SY, Yoo JC, Yun JY, Yoon YC (2016) Accuracy of sagittal oblique view in preoperative indirect magnetic resonance arthrography for diagnosis of tears involving the upper third of the subscapularis tendon. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(12):1944–1953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Meyer DC, Zimmermann SM, Wieser K, Bensler S, Gerber C, Germann M (2016) Lengthening of the subscapularis tendon as a sign of partial tearing in continuity, J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 25(1):31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.014
- 9.Aktas E, Sahin B, Arikan M, Ciledag N, Buyukcam F, Tokgoz O, Caglar E, Aribas BK (2015) MRI analysis of coracohumeral interval width and its relation to rotator cuff tear, Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 25(2):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1490-4
- 11.Kleist KD, Freehill MQ, Hamilton L, Buss DD, Fritts H (2007) Computed tomography analysis of the coracoid process and anatomic structures of the shoulder after arthroscopic coracoid decompression: a cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 16(2):245–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, Audebert S, Toussaint B, Gobezie R (2007) Structural integrity and clinical outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated subscapularis tears, J Bone Joint Surg Am. 89(6):1184–1193. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.00007
- 21.Friedman RJ, Bonutti PM, Genez B (1998) Cine magnetic resonance imaging of the subcoracoid region. Orthopedics 21(5):545–548Google Scholar
- 23.Cetinkaya M, Ataoglu MB, Ozer M, Ayanoglu T, Kanatli U (2017) Subscapularis tendon slip number and coracoid overlap are more related parameters for subcoracoid impingement in subscapularis tears: a magnetic resonance imaging comparison study. Arthroscopy 33(4):734–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar