Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 3, pp 727–733 | Cite as

Higher complications after previous external beam radiation for extremity soft-tissue sarcoma in the surgical treatment of a local recurrence: a comparative retrospective study of one hundred and three patients

  • Gauthier EloyEmail author
  • Caroline Daveau
  • Sarah Kreps
  • Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette
  • Philippe Anract
  • David Biau
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The use of adjuvant radiation in the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is equivocal in selected cases. Our objective was to compare the short-term outcomes in patients operated on for a local recurrence who had radiation for the primary tumour to those who were spared radiation.

Methods

This was a retrospective study of 103 patients treated for a local recurrence: 48 (47%) with previous radiation and 55 (53%) without. Our primary outcome criterion was to identify the differences in the local treatment provided. Secondary outcomes were the cumulative incidence of a surgical site infection/wound complication (SSI/WC), variables associated with SSI/WC, and local recurrence.

Results

Amputation and the incidence of re-operation were significantly more frequent in patients who received previous radiation compared to patients without previous radiation (27% vs 9%, p = 0.02, for amputation; 26% vs 36% at 2 years for SSI/WC, p = 0.049). Multivariable regression models found previous radiation (p = 0.049), arteriopathy (p = 0.012), location at lower limb (p = 0.09), and use of a flap (0.0048) associated with the risk of SSI/WC.

Conclusions

Previous radiation is associated with an increased risk of amputation and reoperation for SSI/WC when treating a local recurrence. This information should be accounted for when deciding for the use of radiation.

Keywords

Soft tissue sarcoma Radiotherapy Wound complications Surgical site infection Amputation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

This retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the International Ethical Guidelines and Declaration of Helsinki

Conflicts of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Clark MA, Fisher C, Judson I, Thomas JM (2005) Soft-tissue sarcomas in adults. N Engl J Med 353:701–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Chevreau C, Bellera C et al (2014) Adherence to consensus-based diagnosis and treatment guidelines in adult soft-tissue sarcoma patients: a French prospective population-based study. Ann Oncol 25:225–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ducimetière F, Lurkin A, Ranchère-Vince D et al (2011) Incidence of sarcoma histotypes and molecular subtypes in a prospective epidemiological study with central pathology review and molecular testing. PloS One 6(8):e.20294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore J, Isler M, Barry J, Mottard S (2014) Major wound complication risk factors following soft tissue sarcoma resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 40(12):1671–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trovik CS, Gustafson P, Bauer HC et al (2000) Consequences of local recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma: 205 patients from the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Register. Acta Orthop Scand 71(5):488–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marré D, Buendía J, Hontanilla B (2012) Complications following reconstruction of soft-tissue sarcoma: importance of early participation of the plastic surgeon. Ann Plast Surg 69(1):73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Geller DS, Hornicek FJ, Mankin HJ, Raskin KA (2007) Soft tissue sarcoma resection volume associated with wound-healing complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 459:182–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lohman RF, Nabawi AS, Reece GP et al (2002) Soft tissue sarcoma of the upper extremity: a 5-year experience at two institutions emphasizing the role of soft tissue flap reconstruction. Cancer 94:2256–2264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines, (2014) Ann Oncol, 25: p. 102–112Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sherman KL, Wayne JD, Chunq J et al (2014) Assessment of multimodality therapy use for extremity sarcoma in the United States. J Surg Oncol 109(5):395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pisters PW, Harrison LB, Leung DH et al (1996) Long-term results of a prospective randomized trial of adjuvant brachytherapy in soft tissue sarcoma. J Clin Oncol 14(3):859–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang JC, Chang AE, Baker AR et al (1998) Randomized prospective study of the benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas of the extremity. J Clin Oncol 16:197–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dickie C, Griffin AM, Parent AL et al (2012) The relationship between local recurrence and radiotherapy treatment volume for soft tissue sarcomas treated with external beam radiotherapy and function preservation surgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82(4):1528–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sampo MM, Tuomikoski L, Tarkkanen M et al (2014) Marginal miss or radioresistance? The pattern of local recurrence after operation and 3D planned radiation treatment in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities and the limb girdles; an analysis based on image fusion. Acta Oncol 53(4):557–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D’Andrea FP, Safwat A, Burns JS et al (2012) Tumor microenvironment and radiation response in sarcomas originating from tumorigenic human mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Radiat Biol 88(6):457–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Sullivan B, Davis AM, Turcotte R et al (2002) Preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the limbs: a randomized trial. Lancet 359(9325):2235–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis AM, O’Sullivan B, Turcotte R et al (2005) Late radiation morbidity following randomization to preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy in extremity soft tissue sarcoma. Radiother Oncol 75(1):48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    The International Ethical Guidelines and Declaration of Helsinki. http://www.who.int/bulletin/archives/79%284%29373.pdf (date last accessed 9 Jan 2018)
  19. 19.
    Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Malawer MM (1981) The effect of the anatomic setting on the results of surgical procedures for soft parts sarcoma of the thigh. Cancer 47(5):1005–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerrand CH, Wunder JS, Kandel RA et al (2001) Classification of positive margins after resection of soft-tissue sarcoma of the limb predicts the risk of local recurrence. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(8):1149–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Riad S, Biau D, Holt GE et al (2012) The clinical and functional outcome for patients with radiation-induced soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer 118(10):2682–2692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Biau DJ, Fergusson PC, Chung P et al (2012) Local recurrence of localized soft tissue sarcoma: a new look at old predictors. Cancer 118(23):5867–5877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsai JH, Makonnen S, Feldman M et al (2005) Ionizing radiation inhibits tumor neovascularization by inducing ineffective angiogenesis. Cancer Biol Ther 4(12):1395–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schultze-Mosgau S, Grabenbauer GG, Radelspiel-Tröger M et al (2002) Vascularization in the transition area between free grafted soft tissue and pre-irradiated graft bed tissue following preoperative radiotherapy in the head and neck region. Head Neck 24:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mouthon MA, Vereycken-Holler V, Van der Meeren A et al (2003) Irradiation increases the interactions of platelets with the endothelium in vivo: analysis by eintravital microscopy. Radiat Res 160:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Orthopedic SurgeryHopital CochinParisFrance
  2. 2.RadiotherapyHopital Europeen Georges PompidouParisFrance
  3. 3.OncologyHopital CochinParisFrance

Personalised recommendations