Morphometry evaluations of cervical osseous endplates based on three dimensional reconstructions
- 113 Downloads
Accurate and comprehensive data on cervical endplates is essential for developing and improving cervical devices. However, current literature on vertebral disc geometry is scarce or not suitable. The aim of this study was to obtain quantitative parameters of cervical endplates and provide morphometric references for designing cervical devices.
In this study, 19 human cervical spine cadaveric specimens were considered. Employing a reverse engineering system, the surface information of each endplate was recorded in digital cloud and then 3D reconstructed. A measurement protocol that included three sagittal and three frontal surface curves was developed. The information of surface curves and endplate concavity were obtained and analyzed. The parametric equations of endplate surfaces were deduced based on coordinates of landmarks, and the reliability was verified.
The cervical endplate surface had a trend that to be transversely elongated gradually. The concavity depths of inferior endplates (1.88 to 2.13 mm) were significantly larger than those of superior endplates (0.62 to 0.84 mm). The most-concave points in inferior endplates were concentrated in the central portion, while always located in post-median region in superior endplates.
These results will give appropriate guidelines to design cervical prostheses without sacrificing valuable bone stock. The parametric equations applied for generating surface profile of cervical endplates may provide great convenience for subsequent studies.
KeywordsMorphology Cervical vertebra endplates Cervical prostheses Anatomy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 5.Zhu YH, Cheng KL, Zhong Z, Li YQ, Zhu QS (2016) Morphologic evaluation of Chinese cervical endplate and uncinate process by three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions for helping design cervical disc prosthesis. J Chin Med Assoc 79(9):500–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2016.04.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Lin CY, Kang H, Rouleau JP, Hollister SJ, Marca FL (2009) Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Spine 34(15):1554–1560. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aa643b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Mende KC, Eicker SO, Weber F (2017) Cage deviation in the subaxial cervical spine in relation to implant position in the sagittal plane. Neurosurg Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-017-0850-z
- 23.Truumees E, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, Herkowitz HN (2003) Failure of human cervical endplates: a cadaveric experimental model. Spine 28(19):2204–2208. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000084881.11695.50 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar