Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 5, pp 1223–1230 | Cite as

Osteoarthritis is associated with increased failure of proximal femoral fracture fixation

  • Charles A. GallagherEmail author
  • Christopher W. Jones
  • Lara Kimmel
  • Christopher Wylde
  • Anthony Osbrough
  • Max Bulsara
  • Kathryn Hird
  • Piers Yates
Original Paper
  • 324 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the presence of hip osteoarthritis at the time of hip fracture increases treatment failure rates when using either a sliding hip screw (SHS) or proximal femoral nail (PFN) for fracture fixation.

Methods

A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 455 women and 148 men (median age, 83.8 years) treated with SHS or PFN was performed. Osteoarthritis was evaluated based on pre-operative radiographs using the Kellgren and Lawrence grading system. Treatment failure, which was defined as non-union, avascular necrosis, backing out of the implant, cut out of the proximal screws, peri-prosthetic fracture, implant breakage, or conversion to hemi- or total hip arthroplasty, was evaluated for a follow-up period of four to seven years. Optimal placement of the implant (tip-apex distance (TAD) and 3-point fixation) and the effects of age, sex, the quality of reduction, implant type, fracture stability, fracture type, and time to failure were considered confounders of the relationship between failure and osteoarthritis (OA).

Results

Among the 32 cases (5.3%) of treatment failure, 12 (2%) showed evidence of osteoarthritis. After controlling for age, sex, the quality of reduction, implant type, fracture stability, fracture type, and TAD, osteoarthritis was associated a greater than threefold increase in treatment failure compared with that of patients without pre-operative evidence of osteoarthritis (OR, 3.26; 95% CI, 1.4–7.65; P = 0.006).

Conclusions

After adjusting for potential confounding factors, radiographic evidence of hip osteoarthritis at the time of hip fracture increases the incidence of treatment failure.

Keywords

Hip Neck of femur Fracture Osteoarthritis Treatment Failure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Keith Gallagher, TPTC. TSpTC. Dip Gen Studies, and Rosemary Gallagher TPTC. THTC. GDipSpecEd.

Funding

The authors declare that there was no financial support for this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Formal consent is not required for this type of study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not required for this study in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines and Human Research Ethics Committee approval.

References

  1. 1.
    Leal J, Gray AM, Prieto-Alhambra D, Arden NK, Cooper C, Javaid MK, Judge A (2016) Impact of hip fracture on hospital care costs: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 27:549–558.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3277-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:897–902.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1627-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haleem S, Lutchman L, Mayahi R, Grice JE, Parker MJ (2008) Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years. Injury 39:1157–1163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M (2006) Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures. Int Orthop 30:69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0028-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Whale C, Hulet D, Beebe M, Rothberg D, Zhang C, Presson A, Stuart A, Kubiak E (2016) Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for fixation of AO 31 A1/2 intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Curr Orthop Pract 27(6):604–613.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000424 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reijman M, Hazes JM, Pols HA, Bernsen RM, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM (2004) Validity and reliability of three definitions of hip osteoarthritis: cross sectional and longitudinal approach. Ann Rheum Dis 63:1427–1433.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2003.016477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kellam JF, Meinberg EG, Agel J, Karam MD, Roberts CS (2018) Introduction: fracture and dislocation classification compendium-2018: international comprehensive classification of fractures and dislocations committee. J Orthop Trauma 32:S1–S10.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. Bone Joint J 43-B:647–663Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jensen JS (1980) Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 51(1–6):803–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1058–1064.  https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199507000-00012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W (2010) Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop 34:719–722.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0837-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abram SF, Pollard TB, Andrade AD (2013) Inadequate ‘three-point’ proximal fixation predicts failure of the gamma nail. Bone Joint J 95–B:825–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davis TR, Sher JL, Horsman A, Simpson M, Porter BB, Checketts RG (1990) Intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 72:26–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, Su YP, Wu HF, Chiu FY (2010) Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: an evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 34:1273–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0866-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turgut A, Kalenderer Ö, Karapınar L, Kumbaracı M, Akkan H, Ağuş H (2016) Which factor is most important for occurrence of cutout complications in patients treated with proximal femoral nail antirotation? Retrospective analysis of 298 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:623–630.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2410-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Speitling A, Taglang G, Ekholm C, Jönsson A (2010) 3066 consecutive gamma nails. 12 years experience at a single centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:133.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim WY, Han CH, Park JI, Kim JY (2001) Failure of intertrochanteric fracture fixation with a dynamic hip screw in relation to pre-operative fracture stability and osteoporosis. Int Orthop 25:360–362.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640100287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Krigbaum H, Takemoto S, Kim HT, Kuo AC (2016) Costs and complications of short versus long cephalomedullary nailing of OTA 31-A2 proximal femur fractures in U.S. veterans. J Orthop Trauma 30:125–129.  https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Franklin J, Englund M, Ingvarsson T, Lohmander S (2010) The association between hip fracture and hip osteoarthritis: a case-control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:274.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-11-274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leighton RK, Schmidt AH, Collier P, Trask K (2007) Advances in the treatment of intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. Injury 38(Suppl 3):S24–S34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2007.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araújo J, Branco J, Santos RA, Ramos E (2011) The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartil 19:1270–1285.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2011.08.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dequeker J, Johnell O (1993) Osteoarthritis protects against femoral neck fracture: the MEDOS study experience. Bone 14(Suppl 1):S51–S56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(93)90350-J CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Aguado-Maestro I, Panteli M, García-Alonso M, García-Cepeda I, Giannoudis P (2017) Hip osteoarthritis as a predictor of the fracture pattern in proximal femur fractures. Injury 7:S41–S46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2017.08.03748 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    He R, Ye C, Liu A, Xu M, Nonso N (2016) Arthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture in the elderly: systematic review and meta-analysis of short- and long-term effectiveness. Chin Med J 129(21):2630–2638.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0366-6999.192788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sambandam S, Chandrasekharan J, Mounasamy V, Mauffrey C (2016) Intertrochanteric fractures: a review of fixation methods. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 26:339–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-016-1757-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dagenais S, Garbedian S, Wai EK (2009) Systematic review of the prevalence of radiographic primary hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:623–637.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0625-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martel-Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM, Conaghan PG, Cooper C, Goldring MB, Goldring SR, Jones G, Teichtahl AJ, Pelletier JP (2016) Osteoarthritis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2:16072–16072.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.72 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopaedicsFremantle HospitalFremantleAustralia
  2. 2.Department of PhysiotherapyThe Alfred HospitalMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Epidemiology and Preventive MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.Institute of Health ResearchUniversity of Notre DameFremantleAustralia
  5. 5.School of MedicineUniversity of Notre DameFremantleAustralia

Personalised recommendations