Knee motion symmetry was not restored in patients with unilateral bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty—in vivo three-dimensional kinematic analysis
- 274 Downloads
Although unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is successful in restoring function, there are concerns in relation to asymmetric gait patterns. Bi-cruciate retaining (BCR) TKA design preserves both anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with the potential to restore normal joint kinematics. The purpose of this study was to investigate the in vivo three-dimensional (3D) kinematics of the knee in unilateral BCR TKA patients during gait.
Twenty-nine unilateral BCR TKA patients were evaluated for both knees during treadmill gait using a combined computer tomography and dual fluoroscopic imaging system approach.
Significantly higher flexion (4 ± 6.7°) and internal rotation (4.3 ± 4.7°) and significantly lower adduction (2.5 ± 4.4°) during the stance phase of gait cycle were observed in the implanted side of unilateral BCR TKA patients. Significant asymmetric lateral/medial (3.2 ± 4.8 mm) and anterior/posterior (3.4 ± 4.1 mm) tibial translations were also measured during treadmill gait in this cohort of patients.
Despite maintaining anteroposterior stability, asymmetric knee motion persisted in in vivo unilateral BCR TKA patients during gait. The results of the current study suggested that the knee motion symmetry during gait was not restored in patients with unilateral BCR TKA.
KeywordsTotal knee arthroplasty Knee osteoarthritis BCR TKA Gait symmetry
Partial financial support is from Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA, and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Felson DT, Lawrence RC, Dieppe PA, Hirsch R, Helmick CG, Jordan JM, Kington RS, Lane NE, Nevitt MC, Zhang Y, Sowers M, McAlindon T, Spector TD, Poole AR, Yanovski SZ, Ateshian G, Sharma L, Buckwalter JA, Brandt KD, Fries JF (2000) Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 1: the disease and its risk factors. Ann Intern Med 133(8):635–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Hamel MB, Toth M, Legedza A, Rosen MP (2008) Joint replacement surgery in elderly patients with severe osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: decision making, postoperative recovery, and clinical outcomes. Arch Intern Med 168(13):1430–1440. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.13.1430 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Pua YH, Ong PH, Chong HC, Yeo W, Tan C, Lo NN (2013) Knee extension range of motion and self-report physical function in total knee arthroplasty: mediating effects of knee extensor strength. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 14:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-33 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 8.Yoshida Y, Mizner RL, Ramsey DK, Snyder-Mackler L (2008) Examining outcomes from total knee arthroplasty and the relationship between quadriceps strength and knee function over time. Clinical Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 23(3):320–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Freeman MA, Insall JN, Besser W, Walker PS, Hallel T (1977) Excision of the cruciate ligaments in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977(126):209–212Google Scholar
- 25.Komnik I, Peters M, Funken J, David S, Weiss S, Potthast W (2016) Non-sagittal knee joint kinematics and kinetics during gait on level and sloped grounds with unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty patients. PLoS One 11(12):e0168566. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168566 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar