Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1611–1620 | Cite as

Return to the operating room after patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral arthritis—a systematic review

  • Colin Y. L. Woon
  • Alexander B. Christ
  • Rie Goto
  • Kate Shanaghan
  • Beth E. Shubin Stein
  • Alejandro Gonzalez Della ValleEmail author
Review Article
  • 141 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are accepted treatments for end-stage isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). However, complications and re-operations have historically differed between the two procedures. We performed a systematic review to report on the re-operation rates between TKA and modern PFA for isolated PFOA.

Methods

Systematically identified publications reporting on patients that underwent either TKA or modern PFA for isolated PFOA were reviewed. Meta-analysis software was used to screen potential articles with at least one year follow-up that detailed reasons for re-operation. Data was extracted and analyzed for all re-operations. Survival of the implant was used as the primary outcome; return to the operating room (OR) for any reason was used as a secondary outcome.

Results

The weighted rate of either conversion or revision arthroplasty in the PFA group and the TKA group was 6.34 and 0.11, respectively. The weighted rate of return to the OR for bony and soft tissue procedures was 1.06 and 0.79, respectively. The weighted rate of manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA) was 0.32 and 1.23, respectively.

Conclusion

Patients who undergo PFA may be more likely to return to the operating room for conversion to TKA and/or revision surgery than those who undergo TKA.

Keywords

Isolated patellofemoral arthritis Isolated patellofemoral replacement Total knee replacment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Kara Fields for her assistance in the statistical analysis.

Funding information

This study was partially funded by the generous donation of Mr. Glenn Bergenfield, the Sidney Milton and Leoma Simon Foundation, and by Ms. Elizabeth Kim.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Leadbetter WB, Kolisek FR, Levitt RL, Brooker AF, Zietz P, Marker DR et al (2009) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: a multi-centre study with minimum 2-year follow-up. Int Orthop 33:1597–1601.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0692-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ackroyd CE, Newman JH, Evans R, Eldridge JDJ, Joslin CC (2007) The Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty: five-year survivorship and functional results. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:310–315.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sisto DJ, Sarin VK (2006) Custom patellofemoral arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:1475–1480.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ackroyd CE, Chir B (2005) Development and early results of a new patellofemoral arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:7–13 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1097%2F01.blo.0000171914.94503.d1&key=6b8bd577-e92a-461a-bcaf-34fe5f4eec74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler JE, Shannon R (2009) Patellofemoral arthroplasty with a custom-fit femoral prosthesis. Orthopedics 32:81Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kazarian GS, Tarity TD, Hansen EN, Cai J, Lonner JH (2016) Significant functional improvement at 2 years after isolated patellofemoral arthroplasty with an onlay trochlear implant, but low mental health scores predispose to dissatisfaction. J Arthroplast 31:389–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Akhbari P, Malak T, Dawson-Bowling S, East D, Miles K, Butler-Manuel PA (2015) The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: mid-term prospective results from an independent centre. Clin Orthop Surg 7:171–176.  https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.2.171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Hadithy N, Patel R, Navadgi B, Deo S, Hollinghurst D, Satish V (2014) Mid-term results of the FPV patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee 21:138–141 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.knee.2013.08.010&key=3347400b-fd9c-41a5-b9a7-6c45d42e26a4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benazzo F, Rossi SMP, Ghiara M (2014) Partial knee arthroplasty: patellofemoral arthroplasty and combined unicompartmental and patellofemoral arthroplasty implants - general considerations and indications, technique and clinical experience. Knee 21:S43–S46.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(14)50009-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dahm DL, Al-Rayashi W, Dajani K, Shah JP, Levy BA, Stuart MJ (2010) Patellofemoral arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 39:487–491Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dahm DL, Kalisvaart MM, Stuart MJ, Slettedahl SW (2014) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: outcomes and factors associated with early progression of tibiofemoral arthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:2554–2559.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3202-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davies AP (2013) High early revision rate with the FPV patello-femoral unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 20:482–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2013.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DeDeugd CM, Pareek A, Krych AJ, Cummings NM, Dahm DL (2017) Outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty based on radiographic severity. J Arthroplast 32:1137–1142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hernigou P, Caton J (2014) Design, operative technique and ten-year results of the Hermes™ patellofemoral arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38:437–442.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2158-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Konan S, Haddad FS (2016) Midterm outcome of Avon patellofemoral arthroplasty for posttraumatic unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast 31:2657–2659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mont MA, Johnson AJ, Naziri Q, Kolisek FR, Leadbetter WB (2012) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: 7-year mean follow-up. J Arthroplast 27:358–361.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Morris MJ, Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR, Hurst JM, Adams JB (2013) Clinical results of patellofemoral arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28:199–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Odgaard A, Madsen F, Kristensen PW, Kappel A, Fabrin J (2018) The Mark Coventry Award: patellofemoral arthroplasty results in better range of movement and early patient-reported outcomes than TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476:87–100.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999.0000000000000017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Odumenya M, Costa ML, Parsons N, Achten J, Dhillon M, Krikler SJ (2010) The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: five-year results from an independent centre. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92:56–60.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B1.23135 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Osarumwense D, Syed F, Nzeako O, Akilapa S, Zubair O, Waite J (2017) Patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: early results and functional outcome of the Zimmer gender solutions patello-femoral joint system. Clin Orthop Surg 9:295–302.  https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2017.9.3.295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romagnoli S, Marullo M (2017) Mid-term clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes of 105 gender-specific patellofemoral arthroplasties, with or without the association of medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 33:688–695.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sarda PK, Shetty A, Maheswaran SS (2011) Medium term results of Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Indian J Orthop 45:439–444.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.83761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Starks I, Roberts S, White SH (2009) The Avon patellofemoral joint replacement: independent assessment of early functional outcomes. J Bone Jt Surg Br 91:1579–1582.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B12.23018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ahearn N, Metcalfe AJ, Hassaballa MA, Porteous AJ, Robinson JR, Murray JR et al (2016) The journey patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: a minimum 5-year follow-up study. Knee 23:900–904.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2016.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Middleton SW, Toms AD, Schranz PJ, Mandalia VI (2018) Mid-term survivorship and clinical outcomes of the Avon patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee 25:323–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2018.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sabatini L, Schirò M, Atzori F, Ferrero G, Massè A (2016) Patellofemoral joint arthroplasty: our experience in isolated patellofemoral and bicompartmental arthritic knees. Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord 9:189–193.  https://doi.org/10.4137/CMAMD.S40498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Willekens P, Victor J, Verbruggen D, vande Kerckhove M, van der Straeten C (2015) Outcome of patellofemoral arthroplasty, determinants for success. Acta Orthop Belg 81:759–767Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams DP, Pandit HG, Athanasou NA, Murray DW, Gibbons CL (2013) Early revisions of the Femoro-Patella Vialla joint replacement. Bone Joint J 95–B:793–797.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B6.31355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Meding JB, Wing JT, Keating EM, Ritter MA (2007) Total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral arthritis in younger patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:78–82.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181576069 Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mont MA, Haas S, Mullick T, Hungerford DS (2002) Total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Jt Surg Am 84:1977–1981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Laskin RS, van Steijn M (1999) Total knee replacement for patients with patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:89–95 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.2106%2F00004623-200211000-00011&key=6e24fcfe-b19f-4d69-b831-3270dde81a4f Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parvizi J, Stuart MJ, Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD (2001) Total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:147–152 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1097%2F00003086-200111000-00018&key=dc498da6-819e-4256-8878-63e9fa1a5fb2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.
    Saragaglia D, Mader R, Refaie R (2014) Are results of total knee arthroplasty for isolated patellofemoral OA as good as for medial compartment OA? A medium-term retrospective comparative study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 25:381–386.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-014-1516-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Blazina ME, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Broukhim B, Ivey FM (1979) Patellofemoral replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 144:98–102 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1097%2F00003086-197910000-00017&key=acc4a148-0b9f-44a9-b376-3c77a03005a0 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lubinus H (1979) Patella glide bearing total replacement. Orthopedics 1:199–127.  https://doi.org/10.3928/0147-7447-19790301-03 Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lonner JH (2008) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: the impact of design on outcomes. Orthop Clin North Am 39:347–354.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2008.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lonner JH (2017) Patellofemoral arthroplasty: an evolving science. Instr Course Lect 66:211–221Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    van Jonbergen HW, Poolman RW, van Kampen A (2010) Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. A systematic review of treatment options using the GRADE approach. Acta Orthop 81:199–205.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003628756 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lonner JH (2010) Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Orthopedics 33(653).  https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100722-39
  41. 41.
    Dy CJ, Franco N, Ma Y, Mazumdar M, McCarthy MM, Gonzalez Della Valle A (2012) Complications after patello-femoral versus total knee replacement in the treatment of isolated patello-femoral osteoarthritis. A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2174–2190.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1677-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Reprint—preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Phys Ther 89:873–880 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1093%2Fptj%2F89.9.873&key=0b780b00-d83b-46c9-a831-f1535aadaa2a Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Thompson NW, Ruiz AL, Breslin E, Beverland DE (2001) Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing in isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. J Arthroplast 16:607–612.  https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.23570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Merchant AC (2005) A modular prosthesis for patellofemoral arthroplasty: design and initial results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:40–46 https://hsskbml.tdnetdiscover.com/logging/outgoing?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1097%2F01.blo.0000171917.47869.6c&key=778c3a49-d78a-4008-aec2-1671fa68c006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Charalambous CP, Abiddin Z, Mills SP, Rogers S, Sutton P, Parkinson R (2011) The low contact stress patellofemoral replacement: high early failure rate. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:484–489.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.25899 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yadav B, Shaw D, Radcliffe G, Dachepalli S, Kluge W (2012) Mobile-bearing, congruent patellofemoral prosthesis: short-term results. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 20:348–352.  https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901202000317 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Goh GS, Liow MH, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2015) Four-year follow up outcome study of patellofemoral arthroplasty at a single institution. J Arthroplast 30:959–963.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Feucht MJ, Cotic M, Beitzel K, Baldini JF, Meidinger G, Schöttle PB et al (2017) A matched-pair comparison of inlay and onlay trochlear designs for patellofemoral arthroplasty: no differences in clinical outcome but less progression of osteoarthritis with inlay designs. Knee Surgery Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2784–2791.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3733-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Laursen JO (2017) High mid-term revision rate after treatment of large, full-thickness cartilage lesions and OA in the patellofemoral joint using a large inlay resurfacing prosthesis: HemiCAP-Wave®. Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3856–3861.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4352-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F, Panis Y, Chipponi J (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-2197.2003.02748.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Freeman MF, Tukey JW (1950) Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat 21:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N (2015) Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemp Clin Trials 45:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    The National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2015) Annual report. http://www.njrreports.org.uk/Portals/0/PDFdownloads/NJR%2012th%20Annual%20Report%202015.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2018
  55. 55.
    National Joint Replacement Registry—Australian Orthopaedic Association (2017) Annual Report. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/documents/10180/397736/Hip%2C%20Knee%20%26%20Shoulder%20Arthroplasty. Accessed 1 May 2018
  56. 56.
    van del List JP, Chawla H, Zuiderbaan HA, Pearle AD (2017) Survivorship and functional outcomes of patellofemoral arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2622–2631.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3878-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Chawla H, Nwachukwu BU, van der List JP, Pearle AD, Ghomrawi HM (2017) Cost effectiveness of patellofemoral versus total knee arthroplasty in young patients. Bone Joint J 99-5:1028–1036.  https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B8.BJJ-2016-1032.R1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Booth RE Jr (2006) Revision of a failed patellofemoral arthroplasty to a total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2337–2342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Parratte S, Lunebourg A, Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Argenson JN (2015) Are revisions of patellofemoral arthroplasties more like primary or revision TKAs. Clin Orthop 473:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Christ AB, Baral E, Koch C, Shubin Stein BE, Gonzalez Della Valle A, Strickland SM (2017) Patellofemoral arthroplasty conversion to total knee arthroplasty: retrieval analysis and clinical correlation. Knee 24:1233–1239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nicol SG, Loveridge JM, Weale AE, Ackroyd CE, Newman JH (2006) Arthritis progression after patellofemoral joint replacement. Knee 13:290–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Colin Y. L. Woon
    • 1
  • Alexander B. Christ
    • 1
  • Rie Goto
    • 2
  • Kate Shanaghan
    • 1
  • Beth E. Shubin Stein
    • 3
  • Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement ServiceHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Kim Barrett Memorial LibraryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Sports Medicine ServiceHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations