International Orthopaedics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 891–899 | Cite as

Pulseless supracondylar humeral fractures in children: vascular complications in a ten year series

  • Adeline Cambon-Binder
  • Pascal Jehanno
  • Laurent Tribout
  • Philippe Valenti
  • Anne-Laure Simon
  • Brice Ilharreborde
  • Keyvan Mazda
Original Paper
  • 191 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

The management of pulseless supracondylar fractures remains controversial. The aims of this study were to: (1) analyse functional and vascular outcomes of conservative treatment for cases with absent pulse before reduction, whether patients showed limb ischaemia or not; and (2) identify factors associated with vascular complications.

Methods

Twenty-seven children with absent pulses on presentation were treated consecutively between 1999 and 2009. The brachial artery was surgically explored in cases of persistent signs of ischaemia after reduction. Signs of vascular impairment were recorded in the early post-operative period and at a mean final follow-up of 3.5 years.

Results

Recurrent ischaemia with a compartment syndrome occurred in a patient with initial ischaemia and a pink, pulseless hand after reduction. Patients with an initially well-perfused hand and those with pre-operative ischaemia and palpable pulses after reduction had satisfactory outcomes, as did patients with early arterial exploration. No patient showed signs of chronic vascular impairment. The need for vascular repair was significantly correlated with open fracture, initial ischaemia and nerve impairment.

Conclusions

Conservative management of supracondylar fractures with absent pulses avoided long-term vascular complications provided that patients with a pulseless, well-perfused hand on presentation were closely monitored after reduction. Further study is necessary to determine whether a forearm Doppler would help identify children with absent pulses after reduction who need surgical revascularisation due to an insufficient collateral circulation.

Keywords

Fracture Supracondylar Humerus Children Compartment syndrome Volkmann contracture Ischemia 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Cambon-Binder, Jehanno, Tribout and Simon declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Valenti reports personal fees from FH Orthopedics, and does consulting for Arthrex, Biomet and Zimmer, not related to the submitted work.

Mazda reports being consultant for Implanet, not related to the submitted work.

Ilharreborde reports being a consultant for EOS Imaging, Implanet, Medtronics, and Zimmer Spine, not related to the submitted work.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Ethical review committee

Our local institutional ethical review committee, le Comité d’Evaluation de l’Ethique des Projets de Recherche de Robert Debré, approved the study (Letter N° 2016/299 (2)).

References

  1. 1.
    Landin LA (1983) Fracture patterns in children. Analysis of 8,682 fractures with special reference to incidence, etiology and secular changes in a Swedish urban population 1950-1979. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 202:1–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Damsin JP, Langlais J (1987) Les fractures supracondyliennes. Rapport à la 61ième réunion annuelle de la SOFCOT, Symposium sur les fractures du coude sous la direction de JC Pouliquen. Rev Chir Orthop 73:417–490Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shaw BA, Kasser JR, Emans JB, Rand FF (1990) Management of vascular injuries in displaced supracondylar humerus fractures without arteriography. J Orthop Trauma 4(1):25–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi PD, Melikian R, Skaggs DL (2010) Risk factors for vascular repair and compartment syndrome in the pulseless supracondylar humerus fracture in children. J Pediatr Orthop 30(1):50–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    White L, Mehlman CT, Crawford AH (2010) Perfused, pulseless, and puzzling: a systematic review of vascular injuries in pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures and results of a POSNA questionnaire. J Pediatr Orthop 30(4):328–335CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luria S, Sucar A, Eylon S, Pinchas-Mizrachi R, Berlatzky Yes, Anner H, Liebergall M, Porat S (2007) Vascular complications of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 16(2):133–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clement DA (1990) Assessment of a treatment plan for managing acute vascular complications associated with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Pediatr Orthop 10(1):97–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blakey CM, Biant LC, Birch R (2009) Ischaemia and the pink, pulseless hand complicating supracondylar fractures of the humerus in childhood: long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(11):1487–1492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noaman HH (2006) Microsurgical reconstruction of brachial artery injuries in displaced supracondylar fracture humerus in children. Microsurgery 26(7):498–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malviya A, Simmons D, Vallamshetla R, Bache CE (2006) Pink pulseless hand following supra-condylar fractures: an audit of British practice. J Pediatr Orthop B 15(1):62–64CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim WY, Chandru R, Bonshahi A, Paton RW (2003) Displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children: results of a national survey of paediatric orthopaedic consultants. Injury 34(4):274–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pirone AM, Graham HK, Krajbich JI (1988) Management of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70(5):641–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merino Pérez J, Ibor Ureña I, Rodríguez Bustabad MT, Campos Alonso O, Elorriaga Sagarduya GM, Vicinay Olabarria JI (2009) Supracondylar humerus fractures with associated vascular trauma in children. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 53(5):312–316Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garbuz DS, Leitch K, Wright JG (1996) The treatment of supracondylar fractures in children with an absent radial pulse. J Pediatr Orthop 16(5):594–596CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vasli LR (1988) Diagnosis of vascular injury in children with supracondylar fractures of the humerus. Injury 19(1):11–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gartland JJ (1959) Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet 109(2):145–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mazda K, Boggione C, Fitoussi F, Penneçot GF (2001) Systematic pinning of displaced extension-type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. A prospective study of 116 consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(6):888–893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schoenecker PL, Delgado E, Rotman M, Sicard GA, Capelli AM (1996) Pulseless arm in association with totally displaced supracondylar fracture. J Orthop Trauma 10(6):410–415CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marck KW, Kooiman AM, Binnendijk B (1986) Brachial artery rupture following supracondylar fracture of the humerus. Neth J Surg 38(3):81–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar R, Trikha V, Malhotra R (2001) A study of vascular injuries in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 9(2):37–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Matuszewski Ł (2014) Evaluation and management of pulseless pink/pale hand syndrome coexisting with supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24(8):1401–1406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sabharwal S, Tredwell SJ, Beauchamp RD, Mackenzie WG, Jakubec DM, Cairns R, LeBlanc JG (1997) Management of pulseless pink hand in pediatric supracondylar fractures of humerus. J Pediatr Orthop 17(3):303–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lewis HG, Morrison CM, Kennedy PT, Herbert KJ (2003) Arterial reconstruction using the basilic vein from the zone of injury in pediatric supracondylar humeral fractures: a clinical and radiological series. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(3):1159–1163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Friedman RJ, Jupiter JB (1984) Vascular injuries and closed extremity fractures in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 188:112–119Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fowles JV, Kassab MT (1974) Displaced supracondylar fractures of the elbow in children. A report on the fixation of extension and flexion fractures by two lateral percutaneous pins. J Bone Joint Surg Br 56B(3):490–500CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lally KP, Foster CE 3rd, Chwals WJ, Brennan LP, Atkinson JB (1990) Long-term follow-up of brachial artery ligation in children. Ann Surg 212(2):194–196CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Johnson D, Ellis H (2008) Pectoral girdle and upper limb. In: Standring E (ed) Gray’s anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice, 40th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 823–857Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rodríguez-Niedenführ M, Vázquez T, Nearn L, Ferreira B, Parkin I, Sañudo JR (2001) Variations of the arterial pattern in the upper limb revisited: a morphological and statistical study, with a review of the literature. J Anat 199(Pt 5):547–566CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics and Hand Surgery, AP-HP, Saint-Antoine HospitalUPMC UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, AP-HP, Robert Debré Hospital ParisDenis Diderot UniversityParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of Pediatric Radiology, AP-HP, Robert Debré Hospital ParisDenis Diderot UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations