Advertisement

Utility of pre-procedural CT and abdominal radiography before percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy placement

  • Christopher J. GutjahrEmail author
  • Elden P. Iverson
  • Sean T. Walker
  • Jeremiah D. Johnson
  • Utkarsh Chris Shukla
  • Whitney Terrell
Interventional Radiology
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the utility of pre-procedural CT and abdominal radiography before percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy tube placement.

Methods

A retrospective review of gastrostomy tube placements was conducted at a tertiary care radiology department. During the studied period, all percutaneous radiologic G-tube placements (PRG) at the institution required a pre-procedural abdominal CT. Whether the CT was interpreted to have an adequate window for PRG was recorded. The same patients with pre-procedural abdominal radiographs were also identified and retrospectively reviewed for the presence of satisfactory anatomy for PRG. Outcomes of tube placements were reviewed.

Results

126 PRG requests were identified, all with abdominal CTs. 110 also had an abdominal radiograph. An adequate window for PRG was present in 83% of patients by CT and 73% by radiography. Of patients in whom it was attempted, 94% underwent successful PRG with a 7.4% minor complication rate. Of those refused for PRG based on CT, 9% had successful percutaneous endoscopic G-tube placement, resulting in a sensitivity of 98%. 97% of patients with satisfactory anatomy by radiograph underwent successful PRG. Of those with no window, 66% had a window by CT, and 94% in whom it was attempted had successful PRG placement. This resulted in a sensitivity of 77% for radiography. Concordance between CT and radiography was 73%.

Conclusions

Pre-procedural CT interpretation is highly predictive of successful and uncomplicated PRG. Abdominal radiography also predicts successful PRG, but with a lower accuracy, limiting its utility as a pre-procedural exam.

Keywords

Gastrostomy Retrospective studies Radiography Abdominal Tomography X-ray computed 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Lyon SM, Pascoe DM (2004) Percutaneous Gastrostomy and Gastrojejunostomy. Sem Interven Radiol 21(3):181-189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Given MF, Hanson JJ, Lee MJ (2005) Interventional Radiology Techniques for Provision of Enteral Feeding. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28:692-703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mauro MA, et al. (2014) Image-Guided Interventions. Second edition. Saunders/Elsevier, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaufman JA and Lee MJ (2014) Vascular and Interventional Radiology: The Requisites. Second edition. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Itkin M, DeLegge MH, Fang JC, et al. (2011) Multidisciplinary Practical Guidelines for Gastrointestinal Access for Enteral Nutrition and Decompression from the Society of Interventional Radiology and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute, With Endorsement by Canadian Interventional Radiological Association (CIRA) and Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE). J Vasc Interv Radiol 22: 1089-1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bream P, et al. (2018) Percutaneous Gastrostomy: How to Recognize, Avoid, or Get Out of Trouble. Tech Vasc Interventional Rad 21:255-260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Covarrubias DA, et al. (2013) Radiologic Percutaneous Gastrostomy: Review of Potential Complications and Approach to Managing the Unexpected Outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:921-931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garland M, et al. (2016) The Utility of Abdominal CT for Preoperative Planning of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement. Am Surg 82:e230-232PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pruijsen JM, et al..(2013) Abdominal Plain Film Before Gastrostomy Tube Placement to Predict Success of Percutaneous Endoscopic Procedure. JPGN 56(2): 86-190Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khalilzadeh O, et al. (2017) Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28:1432-1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shin JH, Park A. (2010) Updates on Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy/Gastrojejunostomy and Jejunostomy. Gut Liver Suppl 1: S25-31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kawashima K, et al. (2016) Usefulness of Computed Tomography with Air Insufflation of the Stomach Prior to Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Procedure. J Clin Biochem Nutr 58:246-250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wallace MJ, et al. (2008) Three-Dimensional C-arm Cone-beam CT: Applications in the Interventional Suite. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19:799-813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Möhlenbruch M, et al. (2010) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Radiologic Gastrostomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 33:315-320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  2. 2.Radiology Associates of RichmondRichmondUSA
  3. 3.Radiology Imaging AssociatesScottsbluffUSA
  4. 4.Integris Baptist Medical CenterOklahoma CityUSA

Personalised recommendations