Advertisement

Prostate MR: pitfalls and benign lesions

  • Aritrick Chatterjee
  • Stephen Thomas
  • Aytekin OtoEmail author
Special Section: Male pelvis
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate has evolved to be an integral component for the diagnosis, risk stratification, staging, and targeting of prostate cancer. However, anatomic and histologic mimics of prostate cancer on mpMRI exist. Anatomic feature that mimic prostate cancer on mpMRI include anterior fibromuscular stroma, normal central zone, periprostatic venous plexus, and thickened surgical capsule (transition zone pseudocapsule). Benign conditions such as post-biopsy hemorrhage, prostatitis or inflammation, focal prostate atrophy, benign prostatic hyperplasia nodules, and prostatic calcifications can also mimic prostate cancer on mpMRI. Technical challenges and other pitfalls such as image distortion, motion artifacts, and endorectal coil placements can also limit the efficacy of mpMRI. Knowledge of prostate anatomy, location of the lesion and its imaging features on different sequences, and being familiar with the common pitfalls are critical for the radiologists who interpret mpMRI. Therefore, this article reviews the pitfalls (anatomic structures and technical challenges) and benign lesions or abnormalities that may mimic prostate cancer on mpMRI and how to interpret them.

Keywords

mpMRI Prostate cancer DWI Pitfalls Benign lesions 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Aritrick Chatterjee and Dr. Stephen Thomas have no disclosures. Dr. Aytekin Oto has the following disclosures. Research Grant, Koninklijke Philips NV Research Grant, Guerbet SA Research Grant, Profound Medical Inc. Medical Advisory Board, Profound Medical Inc Speaker, Bracco Group.

References

  1. 1.
    Borofsky S, George AK, Gaur S, et al. What Are We Missing? False-Negative Cancers at Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate. Radiology. 2018; 286(1):186-95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fütterer JJ, Briganti A, De Visschere P, et al. Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Urology. 2015; 68(6):1045-53.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Niaf E, Lartizien C, Bratan F, et al. Prostate Focal Peripheral Zone Lesions: Characterization at Multiparametric MR Imaging—Influence of a Computer-aided Diagnosis System. Radiology. 2014; 271(3):761-9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, et al. Anatomical Features of Periprostatic Tissue and its Surroundings: a Histological Analysis of 79 Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Specimens. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2004; 34(8):463-8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T, et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004; 34(8):463-8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ward E, Baad M, Peng Y, et al. Multi-parametric MR imaging of the anterior fibromuscular stroma and its differentiation from prostate cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017; 42(3):926-34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Koppie TM, Bianco FJ, Jr., Kuroiwa K, et al. The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int. 2006; 98(6):1167-71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bouye S, Potiron E, Puech P, Leroy X, Lemaitre L, Villers A. Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: zone of origin and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology. Prostate. 2009; 69(1):105-13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Panebianco V, Giganti F, Kitzing YX, et al. An update of pitfalls in prostate mpMRI: a practical approach through the lens of PI-RADS v. 2 guidelines. Insights into Imaging. 2018; 9(1):87-101.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McNeal JE. Regional morphology and pathology of the prostate. Am J Clin Pathol. 1968; 49(3):347-57.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vargas HA, Akin O, Franiel T, et al. Normal Central Zone of the Prostate and Central Zone Involvement by Prostate Cancer: Clinical and MR Imaging Implications. Radiology 2012; 262(3):894-902.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta RT, Kauffman CR, Garcia-Reyes K, et al. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values of the Benign Central Zone of the Prostate: Comparison With Low- and High-Grade Prostate Cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205(2):331-6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hansford BG, Karademir I, Peng Y, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol. 2014; 21(5):569-77.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS. Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 202(1):109-20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen RJ, Shannon BA, Phillips M, Moorin RE, Wheeler TM, Garrett KL. Central zone carcinoma of the prostate gland: a distinct tumor type with poor prognostic features. J Urol. 2008; 179(5):1762-7; discussion 7.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cristini C, Di Pierro GB, Leonardo C, De Nunzio C, Franco G. Safe digital isolation of the santorini plexus during radical retropubic prostatectomy. BMC Urol. 2013; 13:13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allen KS, Kressel HY, Arger PH, Pollack HM. Age-related changes of the prostate: evaluation by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 152(1):77-81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ. The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1989; 13(1):21-7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Poon PY, Bronskill MJ, Poon CS, McCallum RW, Bruce AW, Henkelman RM. Identification of the Periprostatic Venous Plexus by MR Imaging. Journal of computer assisted tomography. 1991; 15(2):265-8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bhavsar A, Verma S. Anatomic imaging of the prostate. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014:728539.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kahokehr AA, Gilling PJ. Which laser works best for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Curr Urol Rep. 2013; 14(6):614-9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kitzing YX, Prando A, Varol C, Karczmar GS, Maclean F, Oto A. Benign Conditions That Mimic Prostate Carcinoma: MR Imaging Features with Histopathologic Correlation. RadioGraphics. 2016; 36(1):162-75.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Semple JE. Surgical capsule of the benign enlargement of the prostate. Its development and action. Br Med J. 1963; 1(5346):1640-3.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    White S, Hricak H, Forstner R, et al. Prostate cancer: effect of postbiopsy hemorrhage on interpretation of MR images. Radiology. 1995; 195(2):385-90.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chatterjee A, Tokdemir S, Gallan AJ, et al. Multiparametric MRI Features and Pathologic Outcome of Wedge-Shaped Lesions in the Peripheral Zone on T2-Weighted Images of the Prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019; 212(1):124-9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sharif-Afshar AR, Feng T, Koopman S, et al. Impact of post prostate biopsy hemorrhage on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Can J Urol. 2015; 22(2):7698-702.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qayyum A, Coakley FV, Lu Y, et al. Organ-confined prostate cancer: effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004; 183(4):1079-83.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Kopec M, Kong X, et al. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31(6):1387-94.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Barrett T, Vargas HA, Akin O, Goldman DA, Hricak H. Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer. Radiology. 2012; 263(3):751-7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Roberts RO, Lieber MM, Rhodes T, Girman CJ, Bostwick DG, Jacobsen SJ. Prevalence of a physician-assigned diagnosis of prostatitis: the Olmsted County Study of Urinary Symptoms and Health Status Among Men. Urology. 1998; 51(4):578-84.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Coker TJ, Dierfeldt DM. Acute Bacterial Prostatitis: Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2016; 93(2):114-20.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Holt JD, Garrett WA, McCurry TK, Teichman JM. Common Questions About Chronic Prostatitis. Am Fam Physician. 2016; 93(4):290-6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gurses B, Tasdelen N, Yencilek F, et al. Diagnostic utility of DTI in prostate cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2011; 79(2):172-6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rais-Bahrami S, Nix JW, Turkbey B, et al. Clinical and multiparametric MRI signatures of granulomatous prostatitis. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Shukla P, Gulwani HV, Kaur S. Granulomatous prostatitis: clinical and histomorphologic survey of the disease in a tertiary care hospital. Prostate Int. 2017; 5(1):29-34.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stillwell TJ, Engen DE, Farrow GM. The clinical spectrum of granulomatous prostatitis: a report of 200 cases. J Urol. 1987; 138(2):320-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bour L, Schull A, Delongchamps NB, et al. Multiparametric MRI features of granulomatous prostatitis and tubercular prostate abscess. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013; 94(1):84-90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Benedetti I, Bettin A, Reyes N. Inflammation and focal atrophy in prostate needle biopsy cores and association to prostatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2016; 24:55-61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Freitas DM, Andriole GL, Jr., Castro-Santamaria R, Freedland SJ, Moreira DM. Extent of Baseline Prostate Atrophy Is Associated With Lower Incidence of Low- and High-grade Prostate Cancer on Repeat Biopsy. Urology. 2017; 103:161-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tomas D, Kruslin B, Rogatsch H, Schafer G, Belicza M, Mikuz G. Different types of atrophy in the prostate with and without adenocarcinoma. Eur Urol. 2007; 51(1):98-103; discussion -4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Billis A, Meirelles LR, Magna LA, Baracat J, Prando A, Ferreira U. Extent of prostatic atrophy in needle biopsies and serum PSA levels: is there an association? Urology. 2007; 69(5):927-30.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Guneyli S, Ward E, Thomas S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016; 22(3):215-9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chatterjee A, Gallan AJ, He D, et al. Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer. Abdom Radiol. 2019; 44(6):2233-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Oto A, Kayhan A, Jiang Y, et al. Prostate cancer: differentiation of central gland cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia by using diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2010; 257(3):715-23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    McNeal JE, Redwine EA, Freiha FS, Stamey TA. Zonal distribution of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Correlation with histologic pattern and direction of spread. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988; 12(12):897-906.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    King CR, Ferrari M, Brooks JD. Prognostic significance of prostate cancer originating from the transition zone. Urol Oncol. 2009; 27(6):592-7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D, et al. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Radiology. 2013; 266(1):207-17.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oyen RH, Van de Voorde WM, Van Poppel HP, et al. Benign hyperplastic nodules that originate in the peripheral zone of the prostate gland. Radiology. 1993; 189(3):707-11.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu X, Tang J, Yang JC, Zhang Y, Shi HY. [An autopsy specimen study of benign hyperplastic nodules in the peripheral zone of the prostate]. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2008; 14(4):307-10.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tang J, Yang JC, Zhang Y, et al. Does benign prostatic hyperplasia originate from the peripheral zone of the prostate? A preliminary study. BJU Int. 2007; 100(5):1091-6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Muglia VF, Saber G, Maggioni G, Jr., Monteiro AJ. MRI findings of prostate stromal tumour of uncertain malignant potential: a case report. Br J Radiol. 2011; 84(1006):e194-6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Klimas R, Bennett B, Gardner WA, Jr. Prostatic calculi: a review. Prostate. 1985; 7(1):91-6.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sfanos KS, Wilson BA, De Marzo AM, Isaacs WB. Acute inflammatory proteins constitute the organic matrix of prostatic corpora amylacea and calculi in men with prostate cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009; 106(9):3443-8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Christian JD, Lamm TC, Morrow JF, Bostwick DG. Corpora amylacea in adenocarcinoma of the prostate: incidence and histology within needle core biopsies. Mod Pathol. 2005; 18(1):36-9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Caglic I, Hansen NL, Slough RA, Patterson AJ, Barrett T. Evaluating the effect of rectal distension on prostate multiparametric MRI image quality. European Journal of Radiology. 2017; 90:174-80.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations