Advertisement

Anorectal pitfalls in computed tomography colonography

  • Lori Mankowski Gettle
  • David H. Kim
  • Perry J. PickhardtEmail author
Special Section: Rectal Cancer

Abstract

There is a wide array of pathological lesions seen in the anorectal region with CT colonography (CTC), much of which is unique to this location. Many relatively common findings in the anorectal region are typically benign, but can be misinterpreted as malignant. There are also technique-related pitfalls that can impede accurate diagnosis of anorectal findings at CTC. Understanding common and uncommon lesions in the anorectal region as well as recognizing technical pitfalls will optimize interpretation of CTC and decrease the number of missed cancers and false positives. This review will systematically cover that they key pitfalls confronting the radiologist at CTC interpretation of the anorectal region, primarily dividing them into those related to underlying anatomy and those related to technique. Tips for how to effectively handle these potential pitfalls will also be discussed.

Keywords

CT colonography Virtual colonoscopy Pitfalls Anorectal 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349(23):2191-2200.  https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa031618 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection–systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;259(2):393-405.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101887 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. CT colonography: principles and practice of virtual colonoscopy. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pickhardt PJ, Arluk GM. Atlas of gastrointestinal imaging: radiologic-endoscopic correlation. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2007.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pickhardt PJ. Missed lesions at CT colonography: lessons learned. Abdominal Imaging 2013;38:82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pickhardt PJ. Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions seen at CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Radiographics 2004;24(6):1535-1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pickhardt PJ, Pooler BD, Kim DH, Hassan C, Matkowskyj KA, Halberg RB. The Natural History of Colorectal Polyps Overview of Predictive Static and Dynamic Features. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2018;47(3):515- + .  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2018.04.004
  8. 8.
    Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, Dachman AH, Fenlon HM, Ferrucci JT, Glick SN, Laghi A, Macari M, McFarland EG, Morrin MM, Pickhardt PJ, Soto J, Yee J, Working Group on Virtual C. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236(1):3-9.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2361041926
  9. 9.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, Hinshaw JL, Barlow D, Jensen D, Reichelderfer M, Cash BD. Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(8):711-720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pickhardt PJ, Correale L, Hassan C. Positive Predictive Value for Colorectal Lesions at CT Colonography: Analysis of Factors Impacting Results in a Large Screening Cohort. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019:W1-w8.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.18.20686
  11. 11.
    Kim DH, Hinshaw JL, Lubner MG, del Rio AM, Pooler BD, Pickhardt PJ. Contrast coating for the surface of flat polyps at CT colonography: a marker for detection. European Radiology 2014;24(4):940-946.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3095-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, Takahashi R, Kunihiro M, Kitadai Y, Yoshihara M, Shimamoto F, Chayama K. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;54(1):62-66.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2001.115729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pickhardt PJ, Lam VP, Weiss JM, Kennedy GD, Kim DH. Carpet Lesions Detected at CT Colonography: Clinical, Imaging, and Pathologic Features. Radiology 2014;270(2):435-443.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, Schindler WR. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: Implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology 2004;183(5):1343-1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Robbins JB. Flat (Nonpolypoid) Colorectal Lesions Identified at CT Colonography in a US Screening Population. Academic Radiology 2010;17(6):784-790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2010.01.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Park SH, Kim DH. CT colonography interpretation: how to maximize polyp detection and minimize overcalling. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018;43(3):539-553.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1455-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR. Adenomatous polyp obscured by small-caliber rectal catheter at low-dose CT colonography: A rare diagnostic pitfall. American Journal of Roentgenology 2005;184(5):1581-1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharara AI, Azar C, Amr SS, Haddad M, Eloubeidi MA. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: endoscopic spectrum and review of the literature. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62(5):755-762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2005.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Felt-Bersma RJ, Tiersma ES, Cuesta MA. Rectal prolapse, rectal intussusception, rectocele, solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, and enterocele. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2008;37(3):645-668, ix.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gtc.2008.06.001
  20. 20.
    Levine MS, Piccolello ML, Sollenberger LC, Laufer I, Saul SH. Solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a radiologic diagnosis? Gastrointest Radiol 1986;11(2):187-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poggio JL. Premalignant lesions of the anal canal and squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2011;24(3):177-192.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1286002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feldman M, Friedman LS, Sleisenger MH. Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2002.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levy AD, Remotti HE, Thompson WM, Sobin LH, Miettinen M. Anorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: CT and MR imaging features with clinical and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(6):1607-1612.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.6.1801607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Menias CO, Gopal DV, Arluk GM, Heise CP. Evaluation of submucosal lesions of the large intestine: part 1. Neoplasms. Radiographics 2007;27(6):1681-1692.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.276075027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hain KS, Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Menias CO, Bhalla S. Presacral masses: multimodality imaging of a multidisciplinary space. Radiographics 2013;33(4):1145-1167.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.334115171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Menias CO, Gopal DV, Arluk GM, Heise CP. Evaluation of submucosal lesions of the large intestine: part 2. Nonneoplastic causes. Radiographics 2007;27(6):1693-1703.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.276075028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lev-Chelouche D, Gutman M, Goldman G, Even-Sapir E, Meller I, Issakov J, Klausner JM, Rabau M. Presacral tumors: a practical classification and treatment of a unique and heterogeneous group of diseases. Surgery 2003;133(5):473-478.  https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2003.118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pickhardt PJ. Screening CT colonography: how I do it. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189(2):290-298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kim DH, Moreno CC, Pickhardt PJ. Computed Tomography Colonography: Pearls and Pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 2018;56(5):719-735.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2018.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pickhardt PJ. Imaging and Screening for Colorectal Cancer with CT Colonography. Radiologic Clinics of North America 2017;55(6):1183- + .  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2017.06.009
  31. 31.
    Chang KJ, Kim DH. CTC technique: methods to ensure an optimal exam. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018;43(3):523-538.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1499-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kim DH, Lubner MG, Cahoon AR, Pooler BD, Pickhardt PJ. Flat Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Relevance, Appearance, and Optimizing Interpretation. Radiographics 2018;38(1):60-74.  https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kim DH, Matkowskyj KA, Lubner MG, Hinshaw JL, del Rio AM, Pooler BD, Weiss JM, Pickhardt PJ. Serrated Polyps at CT Colonography: Prevalence and Characteristics of the Serrated Polyp Spectrum. Radiology 2016;280(2):455-463.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016151608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH. Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. American Journal of Roentgenology 2006;186(6):1491-1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Buchach CM, Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ. Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2011;36(5):538-544.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9666-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pickhardt PJ, Bakke J, Kuo J, Robbins JB, Lubner MG, del Rio AM, Kim DH. Volumetric Analysis of Colonic Distention According to Patient Position at CT Colonography: Diagnostic Value of the Right Lateral Decubitus Series. American Journal of Roentgenology 2014;203(6):W623-W628.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.13.12369 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S. CT colonography: avoiding traps and pitfalls. Insights Imaging 2011;2(1):57-68.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-010-0054-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bannas P, Li Y, Motosugi U, Li K, Lubner M, Chen GH, Pickhardt PJ. Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing Metal Artifact Reduction (PICCS-MAR): 2D and 3D Image Quality Improvement with Hip Prostheses at CT Colonography. Eur Radiol 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4044-1
  39. 39.
    Lubner MG, Pickhardt PJ, Tang J, Chen G-H. Reduced Image Noise at Low-Dose Multidetector CT of the Abdomen with Prior Image Constrained Compressed Sensing Algorithm. Radiology 2011;260(1):248-256.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lubner MG, Pooler BD, Kitchin DR, Tang J, Li K, Kim DH, del Rio AM, Chen G-H, Pickhardt PJ. Sub-milliSievert (sub-mSv) CT colonography: a prospective comparison of image quality and polyp conspicuity at reduced-dose versus standard-dose imaging. European Radiology 2015;25(7):2089-2102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-3603-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Tang J, Ruma JA, del Rio AM, Chen GH. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(6):1266-1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lori Mankowski Gettle
    • 1
  • David H. Kim
    • 1
  • Perry J. Pickhardt
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations