Comparison of two small bowel distending agents for enterography in pediatric small bowel imaging
To evaluate the ability of pediatric patients with known or suspected inflammatory bowel disease to ingest a new oral distending agent at CT or MR enterography (CTE/MRE), and to determine the impact on small bowel (SB) distension and diagnostic confidence.
Materials and methods
The study design is that of retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent CTE or MRE from January 2014 to June 2016. Patients ingested low-concentration barium suspension or flavored beverage containing sorbitol and mannitol. The need for nasogastric tube (NGT) administration, amount ingested, emesis, distal extent of contrast, SB distension, terminal ileum (TI) transverse dimension, and diagnostic confidence in TI disease were assessed. Three radiologists each blindly reviewed a subset of the studies.
Of the total 591 scans in 504 patients, 316 scans used low-concentration barium suspension and 275 scans flavored beverage. Nearly all consumed the entire amount (97% vs. 96%). Low-concentration barium suspension exams required NGT more often (7% [23/316] vs. 1% [3/275]; p < 0.0003), and tended to have more emesis (3% [9/316] vs. 1% [3/275]; p = 0.13). Diagnostic confidence score was nearly identical (p = 0.94). Qualitative and quantitative analyses showed no difference in SB distension, except for distension of mid-ileum (flavored beverage > low-concentration barium suspension; p = 0.02). Flavored beverage exams demonstrated a slight increase in distal extent of luminal distension (p = 0.02).
A new flavored beverage distends small bowel as well as low-concentration barium suspension, with decreased requirement for NGT insertion and improved distal extent of luminal distension, and without any decrease in diagnostic confidence in the presence or the absence of TI disease.
KeywordsEnterography Pediatric Crohn’s disease Oral contrast Enteric contrast
The authors would like to acknowledge Alicia Woodward for her contributions to the chart review.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest related to this work.
- 1.Paulsen SR, Huprich JE, Fletcher JG, Booya F, Young BM, Fidler JL, Johnson CD, Barlow JM, Earnest Ft (2006) CT enterography as a diagnostic tool in evaluating small bowel disorders: review of clinical experience with over 700 cases. Radiographics 26 (3):641-657; discussion 657-662. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.263055162
- 5.Bruining DH, Zimmermann EM, Loftus EV, Sandborn WJ, Sauer CG, Strong SA (2018) Consensus Recommendations for Evaluation, Interpretation, and Utilization of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Patients With Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease. GastroenterologyGoogle Scholar
- 8.Gore R MG, Caroline D (2008) Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. In: Gore R LM (ed) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. 3rd ed edn. Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, pp 781–806Google Scholar
- 16.LimLim BK, Bux SI, Rahmat K, Lam SY, Liew YW (2012) Evaluation of bowel distension and mural visualisation using neutral oral contrast agents for multidetector-row computed tomography. Singapore Med J 53 (11):732-736Google Scholar
- 17.Kolbe AB, Fletcher JG, Froemming AT, Sheedy SP, Koo CW, Pundi K, Bruining DH, Tung J, Harmsen WS, Barlow JM, Fidler JL (2016) Evaluation of Patient Tolerance and Small-Bowel Distention With a New Small-Bowel Distending Agent for Enterography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 206 (5):994-1002. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.15260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Young BM, Fletcher JG, Booya F, Paulsen S, Fidler J, Johnson CD, Huprich J, Barlow J, Trout A (2008) Head-to-head comparison of oral contrast agents for cross-sectional enterography: small bowel distention, timing, and side effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr 32 (1):32-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0b013e318061961d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Thompson SE, Raptopoulos V, Sheiman RL, McNicholas MM, Prassopoulos P (1999) Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent. Radiology 211 (3):870-875. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn25870 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Absah I, Bruining DH, Matsumoto JM, Weisbrod AJ, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Faubion WA (2012) MR Enterography in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Retrospective Assessment of Patient Tolerance, Image Quality, and Initial Performance Estimates. American Journal of Roentgenology 199 (3):W367-W375. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.11.8363 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.ACR–SAR–SPR practice parameter for the performance of computed tomography (CT) enterography (2015).Google Scholar
- 27.ACR–SAR–SPR practice parameter for the performance of magnetic resonance (MR) enterography (2015).Google Scholar
- 29.Dillman JR, Towbin AJ, Imbus R, Young J, Gates E, Trout AT (2018) Comparison of Two Neutral Oral Contrast Agents in Pediatric Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study. Radiology:173039Google Scholar
- 30.Dillman JR, Ladino-Torres MF, Adler J, DeMatos-Malliard V, McHugh JB, Khalatbari S, Strouse PJ (2011) Comparison of MR enterography and histopathology in the evaluation of pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatric Radiology 41 (12):1552-1558. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2186-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Vernier–Massouille G, Balde M, Salleron J, Turck D, Dupas JL, Mouterde O, Merle V, Salomez JL, Branche J, Marti R, Lerebours É, Cortot A, Gower–Rousseau C, Colombel JF (2008) Natural History of Pediatric Crohn's Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study. Gastroenterology 135 (4):1106-111. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.079 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Duricova D, Burisch J, Jess T, Gower-Rousseau C, Lakatos PL (2014) Age-related differences in presentation and course of inflammatory bowel disease: an update on the population-based literature. Journal of Crohn's & colitis 8 (11):1351-1361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crohns.2014.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Church PC, Greer M-LC, Cytter-Kuint R, Doria AS, Griffiths AM, Turner D, Walters TD, Feldman BM (2017) Magnetic resonance enterography has good inter-rater agreement and diagnostic accuracy for detecting inflammation in pediatric Crohn disease. Pediatric radiology 47 (5):565-575CrossRefGoogle Scholar