Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 9, pp 3069–3077 | Cite as

Uncommon imaging evolutions of focal liver lesions in cirrhosis

  • Federica VernuccioEmail author
  • Roberto Cannella
  • Giorgia Porrello
  • Alberto Calandra
  • Massimo Midiri
  • Alessandro Furlan
  • Giuseppe Brancatelli
Review

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this article is to describe and illustrate uncommon imaging evolutions of benign (i.e., cyst, hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules, and hepatic angiomyolipoma) and malignant (i.e., HCC and non HCC malignancies) lesions in a cirrhotic liver. The content highlights relevant pathogenesis and imaging clues for proper differential diagnosis. Revision of prior imaging and knowledge of these scenarios may help the abdominal radiologist to reach a noninvasive diagnosis and direct the patient to the most appropriate clinical management.

Conclusion

Uncommon imaging evolutions of focal liver lesions in cirrhosis may represent a challenge for the abdominal radiologist, with atypical changes in size, and internal vascularization changes that may lead to misdiagnoses.

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma Magnetic resonance imaging Computed tomography Liver cirrhosis Liver neoplasms 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Disclosures

Federica Vernuccio, Roberto Cannella, Giorgia Porrello, Alberto Calandra, Massimo Midiri, Alessandro Furlan, and Giuseppe Brancatelli have no conflicts of interest to disclose for this study. Alessandro Furlan: Research Grant with General Electric; Elsevier/Amirsys author.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Cerny M, Bergeron C, Billiard JS, et al. LI-RADS for MR Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Performance of Major and Ancillary Features. Radiology. 2018; 288:118–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Blachar A, Grazioli L. Hemangioma in the cirrhotic liver: diagnosis and natural history. Radiology. 2001; 219:69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vernuccio F, Ronot M, Dioguardi Burgio M, et al. Uncommon evolutions and complications of common benign liver lesions. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:2075–2096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huz JI, Melis M, Sarpel U. Spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma is most often associated with tumour hypoxia or a systemic inflammatory response. HPB (Oxford) 2012; 14:500–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Motosugi U, Ichikawa T, Sou H, et al. Distinguishing hypervascular pseudolesions of the liver from hypervascular hepatocellular carcinomas with gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2010; 256:151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Galia M, Taibbi A, Marin D, et al. Focal lesions in cirrhotic liver: what else beyond hepatocellular carcinoma? Diagn Interv Radiol 2014; 20:222–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ding H, Wei H, Liu H, Chen Y, Xue X, Weng H. The Histopathological Features and CT/MRI Imaging Performances in Hepatic Angiomyolipoma Patients. Ann Hepatol 2017; 16:759–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee YH, Kim SH, Cho MY, Shim KY, Kim MS. Focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188:W459–W463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kitao A, Matsui O, Yoneda N, et al. Differentiation Between Hepatocellular Carcinoma Showing Hyperintensity on the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI and Focal Nodular Hyperplasia by CT and MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211:347–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vilgrain V, Boulos L, Vullierme MP, Denys A, Terris B, Menu Y. Imaging of atypical hemangiomas of the liver with pathologic correlation. Radiographics 2000; 20:379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bartolozzi C, Cioni D, Donati F, Lencioni R. Focal liver lesions: MR imaging-pathologic correlation. Eur Radiol 2001; 11:1374–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dodd GD, Baron R, Oliver JH, Federle MP. Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis: part II, focal abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:1185–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duran R, Ronot M, Di Renzo S, Gregoli B, Van Beers BE, Vilgrain V. Is magnetic resonance imaging of hepatic hemangioma any different in liver fibrosis and cirrhosis compared to normal liver? Eur J Radiol 2015; 84:816–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Doyle DJ, Khalili K, Guindi M, Atri M. Imaging features of sclerosed hemangioma. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189:67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ridge CA, Shia J, Gerst SR, Do RK. Sclerosed hemangioma of the liver: concordance of MRI features with histologic characteristics. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 39:812–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chernyak V, Kobi M, Flusberg M, Fruitman KC, Sirlin CB. Effect of threshold growth as a major feature on LI-RADS categorization. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017; 42:2089–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin C, et al. Diagnosis, Staging and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2018; 68:723–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tang A, Bashir MR, Corwin MT, et al. Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review. Radiology 2018; 286:29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fraum TJ, Tsai R, Rohe E, et al. Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Other Hepatic Malignancies in Patients at Risk: Diagnostic Performance of the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2014. Radiology 2018; 286:158–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sakamaki A, Kamimura K, Abe S, et al. Spontaneous regression of hepatocellular carcinoma: A mini-review. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:3797–3804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Park YN, Yang CP, Fernandez GJ, Cubukcu O, Thung SN, Theise ND. Neoangiogenesis and sinusoidal "capillarization" in dysplastic nodules of the liver. Am J Surg Pathol 1998; 22:656–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matsui O. Imaging of multistep human hepatocarcinogenesis by CT during intra-arterial contrast injection. Intervirology 2004; 47:271–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Nghiem HV, Umar R, Fontana RJ, Lok AS. Improving the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing liver mass. Liver Transpl 2005; 11:281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fowler KJ, Sheybani A, Parker RA 3rd, et al. Combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma (biphenotypic) tumors: imaging features and diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 201:332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Huang B, Wu L, Lu XY, et al. Small Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Livers May Share Similar Enhancement Patterns at Multiphase Dynamic MR Imaging. Radiology 2016; 281:150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Potretzke TA, Tan BR, Doyle MB, Brunt EM, Heiken JP, Fowler KJ. Imaging Features of Biphenotypic Primary Liver Carcinoma (Hepatocholangiocarcinoma) and the Potential to Mimic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: LI-RADS Analysis of CT and MRI Features in 61 Cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016; 207:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tanabe M, Kanki A, Wolfson T, et al. Imaging Outcomes of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2014 Category 2, 3, and 4 Observations Detected at CT and MR Imaging. Radiology 2016; 281:129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tabrizian P, Jibara G, Shrager B, Schwartz M, Roayaie S. Recurrence of hepatocellular cancer after resection: patterns, treatments, and prognosis. Ann Surg 2015; 261:947–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roayaie S, Obeidat K, Sposito C, et al. Resection of hepatocellular cancer ≤2 cm: results from two Western centers. Hepatology 2013; 57:1426–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L, et al. Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation. Radiology 2005; 234:961–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Khan KN, Yatsuhashi H, Yamasaki K, et al. Prospective analysis of risk factors for early intrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following ethanol injection. J Hepatol 2000; 32:269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tezuka M, Hayashi K, Kubota K, et al. Growth rate of locally recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: comparing the growth rate of locally recurrent tumor with that of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Dis Sci 2007; 52:783–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento Promozione della Salute, Materno-Infantile, Medicina Interna e Specialistica di Eccellenza “G.D’Alessandro” (PROMISE)University of PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.University Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
  3. 3.I.R.C.C.S. Centro Neurolesi Bonino PulejoMessinaItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica avanzata (BIND)University Hospital of PalermoPalermoItaly
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations