A comparison of segmented abdominopelvic fluid volumes with conventional CT signs of abdominal compartment syndrome in a trauma population
- 13 Downloads
To compare the utility of abdominopelvic fluid volume measurements with established computed tomography signs for refractory post-traumatic abdominal compartment syndrome.
This retrospective observational cohort study included 64 consecutive adult trauma patients with preoperative CT and diagnosis of refractory abdominal compartment syndrome requiring decompressive laparotomy at a level I trauma referral center between 2004 and 2014. We hypothesized that abdominal fluid volume measurements would be more predictive of the need for early laparotomy than previously described conventional CT signs of refractory ACS. Abdominopelvic fluid volumes were determined quantitatively using semi-automated segmentation software. The following conventional imaging parameters were recorded: abdominal anteroposterior:transverse ratio (round belly sign); infrahepatic vena cava diameter; distal abdominal aortic diameter; largest single small bowel wall diameter; hydronephrosis, inguinal herniation; and mesenteric and body wall edema. For outcome analysis, patients were stratified into two groups: those who underwent early (< 24 h) and late (≥ 24 h) decompressive laparotomy following CT. Correlation analysis, comparison of means, and multivariate logistic regression were performed.
Abdominal fluid volumes (p = 0.001) and anteroposterior:transverse ratio (p = 0.009) were increased and inferior vena cava diameter (p = 0.009) was decreased in the early decompressive laparotomy group. Multivariate analysis including conventional CT variables, fluid volumes, and laboratory values revealed abdominal fluid volumes (p = 0.012; Δ in log odds of 1.002/mL) as the only independent predictor of early decompressive laparotomy.
Segmented abdominopelvic free fluid volumes had greater predictive utility for decision to perform early decompressive laparotomy than previously described ACS-related CT signs in trauma patients who developed refractory abdominal compartment syndrome.
KeywordsAbdominal compartment syndrome Trauma Computed tomography Quantitative imaging Abdominopelvic fluid volume
Thomas W.K. Battey was supported by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) Medical Student Research Grant #RMS1603. David Dreizin is supported by an RSNA Research Scholar Grant #RSCH1605. This funder had no role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
IRB Approval: This study was approved by the University of Maryland Medical Center Institutional Review Board.
- 1.Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, Duchesne J, Bjorck M, Leppaniemi A, Ejike JC. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive care medicine. 2013;39(7):1190-206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Velmahos G. Comment on: Offner PJ, de Souza AL, Moore EE, et al. Avoidance of abdominal compartment syndrome in damage-control laparotomy after trauma. . Arch Surg 2001;136(6):676-81.Google Scholar
- 10.Muresan M, Muresan S, Brinzaniuc K, Voidazan S, Sala D, Jimborean O, Hussam AH, Bara Jr T, Popescu G, Borz C. How much does decompressive laparotomy reduce the mortality rate in primary abdominal compartment syndrome?: A single-center prospective study on 66 patients. Medicine. 2017;96(5).Google Scholar
- 12.Al-Bahrani A, Abid G, Sahgal E, O'shea S, Lee S, Ammori B. A prospective evaluation of CT features predictive of intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in critically ill surgical patients. Clinical radiology. 2007;62(7):676-82.Google Scholar
- 14.IntelliSpace Portal (ISP): Advanced visualization for real-time radiology (brochure). NV: Koninklijke Philips Electronics 2012.Google Scholar
- 15.Syngo.via – Get the full picture: The 3D routine and advanced reading solution (brochure). Siemens AG; 2013.Google Scholar
- 16.iNtuition: Sophistication and power in the datacenter. Simplicity and elegance at your fingertips (brochure). TeraRecon, Inc.; 2013.Google Scholar
- 19.Dreizin D, Bodanapally U, Mascarenhas D, O’Toole RV, Tirada N, Issa G, Nascone J. Quantitative MDCT assessment of binder effects after pelvic ring disruptions using segmented pelvic haematoma volumes and multiplanar caliper measurements. European radiology. 2018:1-10.Google Scholar
- 21.Van Danne L and JJ De Waele. Effect of decompressive laparotomy on organ function in patients with abdominal compartment syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Critical Care. 2018;22(1):179.Google Scholar
- 24.Young AJ, Weber W, Wolfe L, Ivatury RR, Duane TM. One elevated bladder pressure measurement may not be enough to diagnose abdominal compartment syndrome. The American Surgeon. 2013;79(2):135-9.Google Scholar