Interobserver agreement of computed tomography reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis
- 32 Downloads
To assess the interobserver agreement of computed tomography (CT) reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis (CP).
Subjects and methods
Retrospective analysis of CT of 47 patients (33 males and 11 females, age range 36 to 56 years) with CP who presented with abdominal pain (n = 41), steatorrhea (n = 37), and glucose intolerance (n = 31). The patients underwent CT study using a 16-multidetector CT scanner with a pancreatic protocol including a nonenhanced scan followed by pancreatic phase at 35 s and portal venous phase at 65 s after intravenous injection of nonionic contrast medium. Image analysis was performed by two radiologists according to reporting standards for CP.
There was excellent interobserver agreement (84.8 %) between the two reviewers in CT reporting standards for CP (K = 0.80, 95 % CI 0.75–0.85, P = 0.001). There was good interobserver agreement for pancreatic duct (PD) caliber (K = 0.71, 95 % CI 0.56–0.87, P = 0.001), PD contour (K = 0.76, 95 % CI 0.61–0.91, P = 0.001), PD stricture (K = 0.070, 95 % CI 0.53–0.88, P = 0.001), and distribution of findings (K = 0.69, 95 % CI 0.51–0.86, P = 0.001). There was excellent interobserver agreement for intraductal calculi (K = 0.84, 95 % CI 0.68–0.98, P = 0.001), pancreatic calcifications (K = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.84–0.98, P = 0.001), and pancreatic diameter (K = 0.87, 95 % CI 0.75–0.99, P = 0.001).
CT reporting standards for CP is a reliable method for diagnosis of patients with CP.
KeywordsPancreatitis Inflammation Pancreatic duct Radiology
No funding of this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of this study.
- 4.Barry K (2018) Chronic pancreatitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 97:385-393Google Scholar
- 5.Pham A, Forsmark C (2018) Chronic pancreatitis: review and update of etiology, risk factors, and management. F1000Res https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12852.1
- 8.Salvador García J, Delgado Cordón F (2018) Role of imaging in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Radiologia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2018.10.004
- 14.Engjom T, Pham KD, Erchinger F, Haldorsen IS, Gilja OH, Dimcevski G, et al (2018) Good agreement between transabdominal and endoscopic ultrasound of the pancreas in chronic pancreatitis. Ultraschall Med https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0583-8254
- 22.Wang M, Gao F, Wang X, Liu Y, Ji R, Cang L, Shi Y (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography and T(1) mapping for early diagnosis and classification of chronic pancreatitis. J Magn Reson Imaging https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26008
- 23.Schreyer AG, Jung M, Riemann JF, Niessen C, Pregler B, Grenacher L, et al (2014) S3 guideline for chronic pancreatitis – diagnosis, classification and therapy for the radiologist. Fortschr Röntgenstr 86:1002–1008Google Scholar
- 25.Whitcomb DC, Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Forsmark CE, Frulloni L, Garg P, et al (2018) International consensus statements on early chronic Pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with The International Association of Pancreatology, American Pancreatic Association, Japan Pancreas Society, PancreasFest Working Group and European Pancreatic Club. Pancreatology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2018.05.008
- 27.Tirkes T, Shah ZK, Takahashi N, Grajo JR, Chang ST, Venkatesh SK, et al (2019) Reporting standards for chronic pancreatitis by using CT, MRI, and MR cholangiopancreatography: the Consortium for the Study of Chronic Pancreatitis, Diabetes, and Pancreatic Cancer. Radiology 290:207-215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Megibow AJ (2018) Chronic pancreatitis: revisiting imaging and the values of evidence-based radiologic-clinical collaboration. Radiology 182166Google Scholar
- 32.Liu R, Su W, Gong J, Zhang Y, Lu J (2018) Noncontrast computed tomography factors predictive of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes in patients with pancreatic duct stones. Abdom Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1639-4