Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 7, pp 2582–2593 | Cite as

Transrectal and transvaginal catheter drainages and aspirations for management of pelvic fluid collections: technique, technical success rates, and outcomes in 150 patients

  • David H. BallardEmail author
  • Michael C. Gates
  • Alireza Hamidian Jahromi
  • Daniel V. Harper
  • Daniel V. Do
  • Horacio B. D’Agostino
Interventional Radiology
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate outcomes of image-guided transrectal/transvaginal (TR/TV) drainage for symptomatic pelvic fluid collections (SPFCs).

Materials and methods

Single-center retrospective study of 150 consecutive patients (36 males, 114 females, average age 41 years) who underwent attempted TR/TV drainages of SPFCs during an 11-year, 5-month period. All patients presented with pain and had SPFCs with rectal or vaginal contact on preceding diagnostic CT. Routine technique included Foley catheter insertion, image-guidance with ultrasound and fluoroscopy, 18 g/20 cm Chiba needles, and Seldinger technique for catheter insertion. No anoscope or speculum was used. SPFCs causes were classified by etiology including postoperative—70 (47%); gynecologic—49 (33%); and gastrointestinal—31 (21%). Resolutions of the SPFCs without the need for surgical intervention, collection recurrence, and complications were assessed. Surgical management after attempted TR/TV drainage was considered a failure.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 172/180 procedures [TR 128/134 (95%); TV 44/46 (96%)]. TR/TV drainage successfully managed SPFCs in 141/150 patients (94% success rate) and 145/150 patients (97%) did not require surgical intervention; 4 patients with failed TR/TV drainage attempts were managed conservatively. In 5 patients requiring surgery, 4 were after technically successful TR/TV and 1 was after a failed TR attempt. Complications occurred in 4 (3%) patients: 2 bladder punctures (both resolved with medical management), 1 propagation of sepsis, and 1 hemorrhagic return from TR drainage that prompted surgical exploration.

Conclusion

Transrectal and transvaginal drainage had high technical success rates and were successful in managing the majority (141/150; 94%) of patients with pelvic fluid collections.

Keywords

Image-guided percutaneous drainage Transrectal drainage Transvaginal drainage Abscess drainage Pelvic abscesses Intraabdominal abscesses 

Notes

Funding

No funding was received for this study. Dr. Ballard receives salary support from National Institutes of Health TOP-TIER grant T32-EB021955.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived by the institutional research committee for this HIPAA compliant retrospective study.

References

  1. 1.
    Lorenz JM, Funaki BS, Ray CE, et al. (2009) ACR Appropriateness Criteria on percutaneous catheter drainage of infected fluid collections. J Am Coll Radiol 6:837–843.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2009.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wallace MJ, Chin KW, Fletcher TB, et al. (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous drainage/aspiration of abscess and fluid collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:431–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2009.12.398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ballard DH, Flanagan ST, Griffen FD (2016) Percutaneous Versus Open Surgical Drainage: Surgeon’s Perspective. J Am Coll Radiol 13:364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Graham D, Sanders RC (1982) Ultrasound-directed transvaginal aspiration biopsy of pelvic masses. J Ultrasound Med 1:279–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mauro MA, Jaques PF, Mandell VS, Mandel SR (1985) Pelvic abscess drainage by the transrectal catheter approach in men. AJR Am J Roentgenol 144:477–479.  https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.144.3.477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golfieri R, Cappelli A (2007) Computed tomography-guided percutaneous abscess drainage in coloproctology: review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol 11:197–208.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-007-0354-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ballard DH, Morris TM, DʼAgostino HB (2018) Dakin Solution for Irrigation of Pancreatic Fluid Collections. Pancreas 47:e29–e30.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000001058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballard D, Erickson A, Ahuja C, et al. (2018) Percutaneous Management of Enterocutaneous Fistulae and Abscess-Fistula Complexes. Digestive Disease Interventions 02:131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saokar A, Arellano RS, Gervais DA, et al. (2008) Transvaginal drainage of pelvic fluid collections: results, expectations, and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1352–1358.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akıncı D, Ergun O, Topel Ç, et al. (2018) Pelvic abscess drainage: outcome with factors affecting the clinical success. Diagn Interv Radiol 24:146–152.  https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2018.16500 Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harisinghani MG, Gervais DA, Maher MM, et al. (2003) Transgluteal approach for percutaneous drainage of deep pelvic abscesses: 154 cases. Radiology 228:701–705.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2283020924 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hovsepian DM, Steele JR, Skinner CS, Malden ES (1999) Transrectal versus transvaginal abscess drainage: survey of patient tolerance and effect on activities of daily living. Radiology 212:159–163.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.212.1.r99jl23159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saokar A, Arellano RS, Gervais DA, et al. (2008) Transvaginal drainage of pelvic fluid collections: results, expectations, and experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:1352–1358.  https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jaffe TA, Nelson RC, Delong DM, Paulson EK (2004) Practice patterns in percutaneous image-guided intraabdominal abscess drainage: survey of academic and private practice centers. Radiology 233:750–756.  https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333032063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Khurrum Baig M, Hua Zhao R, Batista O, et al. (2002) Percutaneous postoperative intra-abdominal abscess drainage after elective colorectal surgery. Tech Coloproctol 6:159–164.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s101510200036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ballard DH, Flanagan ST, D’Agostino HB. Abscess Drainage. In Shafa J and Kee S (1st Ed.), Learning Interventional Radiology 2019. Elsevier IncGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ballard DH, Mokkarala M, D’Agostino HB (2018) Percutaneous drainage and management of fluid collections associated with necrotic or cystic tumors in the abdomen and pelvis. Abdom Radiol (NY).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1854-z

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyLouisiana State University Health ShreveportShreveportUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryLouisiana State University Health ShreveportShreveportUSA

Personalised recommendations