Ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of ureteral calculi in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study
To determine the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for diagnosing ureteral calculi in children using a clinical effectiveness approach.
Billing records and imaging reports were used to identify children (≤ 18 years old) evaluated for suspected urolithiasis using ultrasound between March 2012 and March 2017. Patients without unenhanced CT within 24 h (reference standard) were excluded. Imaging (ultrasound and CT) reports were reviewed for presence, number, size, and location of calculi. Diagnostic performance of ultrasound (versus CT) was calculated on an individual ureter basis both by direct calculus visualization as well as direct visualization combined with suspected presence of ureteral stone based on indirect ultrasound findings.
41 ureteral calculi were present in 38 of 69 (55.1%) patients. Mean patient age was 14.7 ± 3.6 years, and 35 of 69 (51%) patients were boys. Based on direct calculus visualization, ultrasound had a sensitivity of 12.8% (95% CI 5.6–26.7%), specificity of 100% (95% CI 96.3–100%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (95% CI 56.6–100%), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 74.4% (95% CI 66.4–81.1%). When ultrasound examinations reported as suspicious for ureteral calculi based on indirect findings also were considered positive, ultrasound had a sensitivity of 41.0% (95% CI 27.1–56.6%), specificity of 95.0% (95% CI 88.7–97.8%), PPV of 76.2% (95% CI 54.9–89.4%), and NPV of 80.3% (95% CI 72.2–86.5%).
In clinical practice, ultrasound has low sensitivity for directly visualizing ureteral calculi subsequently identified by CT, although sensitivity improves when considering suspicious examinations as positive.
KeywordsChildren Calculi Ureter Ultrasound Computed tomography Diagnostic performance
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Riccabona M, Avni FE, Blickman JG, Dacher JN, Lobo ML, Willi U. Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology. Minutes of the ESPR uroradiology task force session on childhood obstructive uropathy, high-grade fetal hydronephrosis, childhood haematuria, and urolithiasis in childhood. Pediatr Radiol 2009; 39:891-8.Google Scholar
- 6.Gartlehner, G., et al., AHRQ Technical Reviews, in Criteria for Distinguishing Effectiveness From Efficacy Trials in Systematic Reviews. 2006, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville (MD).Google Scholar
- 8.BMI Percentile Calculator for Child and Teen. CDC website. https://nccd.cdc.gov/dnpabmi/calculator.aspx. Accessed July 1, 2017.
- 13.Mos C, Holt G, Iuhasz S, Mos D, Teodor I, Halbac M. The sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of ureterolithiasis. Med Ultrason 2010; 12:188-197.Google Scholar