Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 1103–1119 | Cite as

Abdominal and pelvic imaging findings associated with sex hormone abnormalities

  • Nicole Kurzbard-Roach
  • Priyanka JhaEmail author
  • Liina Poder
  • Christine Menias
Review
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Hormones are substances that serve as chemical communication between cells. They are unique biological molecules that affect multiple organ systems and play a key role in maintaining homoeostasis. In this role, they are usually produced from a single organ and have defined target organs. However, hormones can affect non-target organs as well. As such, biochemical and hormonal abnormalities can be associated with anatomic changes in multiple target as well as non-target organs. Hormone-related changes may take the form of an organ parenchymal abnormality, benign neoplasm, or even malignancy. Given the multifocal action of hormones, the observed imaging findings may be remote from the site of production, and may actually be multi-organ in nature. Anatomic findings related to hormone level abnormalities and/or laboratory biomarker changes may be identified with imaging. The purpose of this image-rich review is to sensitize radiologists to imaging findings in the abdomen and pelvis that may occur in the context of hormone abnormalities, focusing primarily on sex hormones and their influence on these organs.

Keywords

Hormone Reproductive endocrinology Estrogen Ultrasound MRI 

References

  1. 1.
    Conn P.M (2005). Introduction to Endocrinology. In: Melmed S., Conn P.M. (eds) Endocrinology. Humana Press: Totowa.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hata S, Miki Y, Saito R, et al. (2013) Aromatase in human liver and its diseases. Cancer Medicine 2:305-315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yager JD, Davidson NE. (2006) Estrogen carcinogenesis in breast cancer. N Engl J Med; 354:270-282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Onstad MA, Schmandt RE, Lu KH. (2016) Addressing the role of obesity in endometrial cancer risk, prevention, and treatment. J Clin Oncol; 34: 4225-4230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harada N, Ota H, Yoshimura N, Katsuyama T, Takagi Y. (1998) Localized aberrant expression of cytochrome P450 aromatase in primary and metastatic malignant tumors of human liver. J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 83: 697-702.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wenniger LM, Terpstra V, Beuers U. (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatic adenoma: epidemiology and pathology. Dig Surg; 27:24-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaltenbach TE, Engler P, Kratzer W, et al. (2016) Prevalence of benign focal liver lesions: ultrasound investigation of 45,319 hospital patients. Abdom Radiol; 41:25-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karhunen PJ. (1986) Benign hepatic tumours and tumour like conditions in men. J Clin Pathol; 39:183-188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Venturi A, Piscaglia F, Vidili G, et al. (2007) Diagnosis ad management of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia. J Ultrasound; 10:116-127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grazioli L, Abrosini R, Frittoli B, Grazioli M, Morone M. (2017) Primary benign liver lesions. Eur J Radiol; 95: 378-398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fodor M, Primavesi F, Braunwarth E, et al. (2018) Indications for liver surgery in benign tumours. Eur Surg; 50: 125-131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB, Merkle EM. (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part I, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. Am J Roentgenol; 195:13-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grazioli L, Bondioni MP, Haradome H, et al. (2012) Hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia: value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging in differential diagnosis. Radiology; 262: 520-529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Casarella WJ, Knowles DM, Wolff M, Johnson PM. (1976) Focal nodular hyperplasia and liver cell adenoma: radiologic and pathologic differentiation. Am J Roentgenol; 131:393-402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Venkatesh K. (2014) Liver masses: a clinical, radiological, and pathological perspective for: Perspectives in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 12: 1414-1429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Virgilio E, Cavallini M. (2018) Managing focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: surgery or minimally invasive approaches? A review of the preferable treatment options. Anticancer Res; 38: 33-36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kuo YH, Wang JH, Lu SN, et al. (2009) Natural course of hepatic focal nodular hyperplasia: a long-term follow-up study with sonography. J Clin Ultrasound; 37: 132-137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agrawal S, Agarwal S, Arnason T, et al. (2015) Management of hepatocellular adenoma: recent advances. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 7:1221-1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stoot J, Coelen R, de Jong MC, Dejong C. (2010) Malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenomas into hepatocellular carcinomas: a systematic review including more than 1600 adenoma cases. HPB (Oxford); 12:509-522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grazioli L, Federle M, Brancatelli G, et al. (2001) Hepatic adenomas: imaging and pathologic findings. Radiographics; 21: 877-894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Aalten SM, Thomeer MGJ, Terkivatan T, et al. (2011) Hepatocellular adenomas: correlation of MR imaging findings with pathologic subtype classifications. Radiology; 261:172-181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Reizine E, Amaddeo G, Pigneur F, et al. (2018) Quantitative correlation between uptake of Gd-BOPTA on hepatobiliary phase and tumor molecular features in patients with benign hepatocellular lesions. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5438-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Guo Y, Li W, Xie Z, et al. (2017) Diagnostic value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-MRI for hepatocellular adenoma: a meta-analysis. J Cancer; 8:1301-1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Agarwal S, Fuentes-Orrego JM, Amason T, et al. (2014) Inflammatory hepatocellular adenomas can mimic focal nodular hyperplasia on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Am J Roentgenol; 203: W408-414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cobey FC, Salem RR. (2004) A review of liver masses in pregnancy and a proposed algorithm for their diagnosis and management. Am J Surg; 187: 181-191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Thomeer MG, Broker M, Verheij J, et al. (2016) Hepatocellular adenoma: when and how to treat? Update of current evidence. Therap Adv Gastroenterol; 9: 898-912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Almashhrawi AA, Ahmed KT, Rahman RN, Hammoud GM, Ibdah JA. (2013) Liver diseases in pregnancy: diseases not unique to pregnancy. World J Gastroenterol; 19: 7630-7638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bonnar J. (1987) Coagulation effects of oral contraception Am J Obstet Gynecol; 157:1042-1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bissonnette J, Durand F, de Raucourt E, et al. (2015) Pregnancy and vascular liver disease. J Clin Exp Hepatol; 5:41-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shin N, Kim YH, Xu H, et al. (2016) Redefining Budd-Chiari syndrome: a systematic review. World J Hepatol; 8: 691-702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dilawari J.B., Bambery P., Chawla Y. (1994) Hepatic outflow obstruction (Budd-Chiari syndrome). Experience with 177 patients and a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore);73:21–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Brancatelli G, Vilgrain V, Federle MP, et al. (2007) Budd-Chiari syndrome: spectrum of imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol; 188: W168-W176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ferra H, Behrens G, Lopera J. (2012) Budd-Chiari syndrome. Am J Roentgenol; 199: 737-745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vilgrain V, Lewin M, Vons C, et al. (1999) Hepatic nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome: imaging features. Radiology; 210:443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brancatelli G, Federle MP, Grazioli L, Golfieri R, Lencioni R. (2002) Large regenerative nodules in Budd- Chiari syndrome and other vascular disorders of the liver: CT and MR imaging findings with clinico- pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol; 178:877–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ruh J, Malago M, Busch Y, et al. (2005) Management of Budd-Chiari syndrome. Dig Dis Sci; 50:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Jha RC, Khera SS, Kalaria AD. (2018) Portal vein thrombosis: imaging the spectrum of diseases with an emphasis on MRI features. Am J Roentgenol; 211:14-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Davidson KG, Dubinsky TJ. (2003) Ultrasonographic evaluation of the endometrium in postmenopausal vaginal bleeding. Radiol Clin N Am; 41:769-780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA, et al. (1998) Endovaginal ultrasound to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA; 280:1510-1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chandra V, Kim JJ, Benbrook DM, Dwivedi A, Rai R. (2016) Therapeutic options for management of endometrial hyperplasia. J Gynecol Oncol; 27:e8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Freeman SJ, Aly AM, Kataoka MY, et al. (2012) The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging. Radiographics; 32:1805-1827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Achiron R, Grisaru D, Golan-Porat N, Lipitz S. (1996) Tamoxifen and the uterus: an old drug tested by new modalities. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 7:374-378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nougaret S, Horta M, Sala E, et al. (2018) Endometrial cancer MRI stating: updated guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Eur Radiol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5515-y Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huo D, Anderson D, Palmer JR, Herbst AL. (2017) Incidence rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix: update after 40-year follow up. Gynecologic Oncology; 146:566-571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gilles R, Michel G, Chancelier MD, Vanel D, Masselot J. (1993) Case report: clear cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina: MR features. Br J Radiol;66:168-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Parikh JH, Barton DPJ, Ind TEJ, Sohaib SA. (2008) MR imaging features of vaginal malignancies. Radiographics; 28:49-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Williams T, Mortada R, Porter S. (2016) Diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome. Am Fam Phys; 94:106-113.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lee TT, Rausch ME. (2012) Polycystic ovarian syndrome: role of imaging in diagnosis. Radiographics; 32: 1643-1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lujan ME, Chizen DR, Pierson RA. (2008) Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: pitfalls and controversies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 30: 671-679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costelo MF, et al. (2018) International PCOS Network. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin Endocrinol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.13795 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fitzgerald S, Divasta A, Gooding H. (2018) An update on PCOS in adolescents. Curr Opin Pediatr; 30:459-465.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Babagbemi KT, Arleo EK, Asrani AV, Troiano RN. (2013) Emergent complications of assisted reproduction: expecting the unexpected. Radiographics; 33:229-244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lurain JR. (2010) Gestational trophoblastic disease I: epidemiology, pathology, clinical presentation, and diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease, and management of hydatidiform mole. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 203: 531-539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lurain JR. (2011) Gestational trophopblastic disease II: classification and management of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 204: 11-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Shaaban AM, Rezvani M, Haroun RR, et al. (2017) Gestational trophoblastic disease: clinical and imaging features. Radiographics; 37: 681-700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Stenman UH, Alfthan H, Hotakainen K. (2004) Human chorionic gonadotropin in cancer. Clin Biochem; 37:549-561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hotakainen K. (2002) The free beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer; 86:185-189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shimomura T. (2005) Sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma with a chromophobe component producing beta-human chorionic gonadotropin. Int J Urol; 12: 835-837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Rukundo J, Ntasumbumuyange D, Small M, Rulisa S, Bazzett-Matabele L. (2017) Theca lutein cysts in the setting of primary hypothyroidism. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology; 50: EP25.13.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Jung BG, Kim H. (2001) Severe spontaneous ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome with MR findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 25: 215-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP. (2001) Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics; 21: 193-216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Glastonbury CM. (2002) The shading sign. Radiology; 224:199-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Corwin MT, Gerscovich EO, Lamba R, Wilson M, McGahan JP. (2013) Differentiation of ovarian endometriomas from hemorrhagic cysts at MR imaging: utility of the T2 dark spot sign. Radiology; 271:126-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    McDermott S, Oei TN, Iyer VR, Lee SI. (2012) MR imaging of malignancies arising in endometriomas and extra-ovarian endometriosis. Radiographics; 32:845-863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Levine D, Brown DL, Andreotti RF, et al. (2010) Management of asymptomatic ovarian and other adnexal cysts imaged at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology; 256:943-954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Outware EK, Wagner BJ, Mannion C, et al. (1998) Sex cord-stromal and steroid cell tumors of the ovary. Radiographics; 18: 1523-1546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Jung SE, Rha SE, Lee JM, et al. (2005) CT and MRI findings of sex cord-stromal tumor of the ovary. Am J Roentgenol; 185:207-215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Horta M, Cunha TM, Marques RC, Felix A. (2014) Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor with heterologous elements of gastrointestinal type associated with elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein level: an unusual case and literature review. Radiology Case; 8:30-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    McGill FM, Ritter DB, Rickard CS, et al. (1999) Krukenberg tumors: can management be improved? Gynecol Obstet Invest; 48:61-65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bacchus H. (ed) (1975) Amenorrhea. In: Essentials of Gynecologic and Obstetric Endocrinology. Springer: Dordrecht.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-9834-9_6.
  71. 71.
    Syed FA, Oursler MJ, Hefferanm TE, et al. (2008) Effects of estrogen therapy on bone marrow adipocytes in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Osteoporos Int; 19:1323-1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Biomedical ImagingUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyMayo ClinicScottsdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations