Advertisement

Abdominal Radiology

, Volume 43, Issue 11, pp 3060–3067 | Cite as

Voiding cystourethrography after prostatectomy: spectrum of appearances

  • Matthew A. Morgan
  • Nicholas Papanicolaou
Pictorial essay
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

This article reviews current prostatectomy techniques and then techniques for fluoroscopic voiding cystourethrography (VCUG) evaluation of the prostate and bladder after prostatectomy. Both normal post-prostatectomy appearances and complications will be reviewed.

Conclusion

VCUG is a useful evaluation for both common and uncommon post-prostatectomy complications and appropriate interpretation of the VCUG complications is important to aid the urologist’s clinical decision making.

Key words

Cystourethrogram Prostatectomy Fluoroscopy Genitourinary Postsurgical 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

No funding for this study.

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Informed consent

A waiver for informed consent was granted by the institutional IRB.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, et al. (2017) Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2014, featuring survival. J Natl Cancer Inst.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx030 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. (2012) Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 62(3):431–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veeratterapillay R, Goonewardene SS, Barclay J, Persad R, Bach C (2017) Radical prostatectomy for locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 99(4):259–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA (2015) Campbell-Walsh Urology, 11th edn. Philadelphia: ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tyritzis SI, Katafigiotis I, Constantinides CA (2012) All you need to know about urethrovesical anastomotic urinary leakage following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 188(2):369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gnanapragasam VJ, Baker P, Naisby GP, et al. (2005) Identification and validation of risk factors for vesicourethral leaks following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 12:948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hakimi AA, Faleck DM, Sobey S, et al. (2012) Assessment of complication and functional outcome reporting in the minimally invasive prostatectomy literature from 2006 to the present. BJU Int 109:26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sanda MG, Chen RC, Crispino T, et al. (2017) Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Linthicum: American Urological AssociationGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Loughlin KR (ed) (2007) Complications of Urologic Surgery and Practice: Diagnosis, Prevention, and Management, 1st edn. Boca Raton: CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patel R, Lepor H (2003) Removal of the urinary catheter on postoperative days 3 or 4 following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dalton DP, Schaeffer AJ, Garnett JE, et al. (1989) Radiographic assessment of the vesicourethral anastomosis directing early decatheterization following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 141:79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Latini JM, Mueller E, Lux MM, et al. (2004) Voiding frequency in a sample of asymptomatic American men. J Urol 172:980–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramsden AR, Chodak GW (2004) Can leakage at the vesico-urethral anastomosis be predicted after radical retropubic prostatectomy? BJU Int 93:503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mochtar CA, Kauer PC, Laguna MP, et al. (2007) Urinary leakage after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. J Endourol 21:1371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berlin JW, Ramchandani P, Banner MP, et al. (1994) Voiding cystourethrography after radical prostatectomy: normal findings and correlation between contrast extravasation and anastomotic strictures. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162(1):87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Han KS, Choi HJ, Jung DC, et al. (2011) A prospective evaluation of conventional cystography for detection of urine leakage at the vesicourethral anastomosis site after radical prostatectomy based on computed tomography. Clin Radiol 66:251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Patil N, Krane L, Javed K, et al. (2009) Evaluating and grading cystographic leakage: correlation with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing robotic prostatectomy. BJU Int 103:1108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Castillo OA, Alston C, Sanchez-Salas R (2009) Persistent vesicourethral anastomotic leak after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: laparoscopic solution. Urology. 73(1):124–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yee DS, Ornstein DK (2008) Repair of rectal injury during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 72(2):428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elliott SP, Meng MV, Elkin EP, et al. (2007) Incidence of urethral stricture after primary treatment for prostate cancer: data From CaPSURE. J Urol 178:529–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations