Abdominal seeding of renal cell carcinoma: radiologic, pathologic, and prognostic features
- 308 Downloads
We analyzed radiologic and histologic characteristics, and prognosis of abdominal seeding from renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Consecutive 25 patients with RCC and histologically or radiologically diagnosed abdominal seeding were analyzed. No patient had another type of malignancy. Histologic subtype, Fuhrman grade, sarcomatoid differentiation, and T-stage of primary tumors were assessed. Pre- or postoperative presentation of seeding was investigated. Median survival time and RCC-specific survival rates were evaluated.
Of 25 patients, 15 (60%) died and 4 (16%) were hopelessly discharged (median follow-up time, 6 months; range 1–62 months). Histologic subtypes were clear cell (76%, 19/25), papillary (16%, 4/25), chromophobe (4%, 1/25), and poorly differentiated (4%, 1/25). Fuhrman grades were 4 (48%, 12/25), 3 (36%, 9/25), 2 (12%, 3/25), and unknown (4%, 1/25). T-stage of the four patients with grade 2 or unknown was 3a. Sarcomatoid differentiation and postoperative occurrence were found in 32% (8/25) and 80% (20/25), respectively. Median survival time was 13 months, and 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year RCC-specific survival rates were 51%, 41%, and 31%, respectively.
Abdominal seeding may occur in various subtypes of RCC with high Fuhrman grade including sarcomatoid differentiation or high T-stage, and appears to be related to poor prognosis.
KeywordsRenal cell carcinoma Seeding Carcinomatosis Implant Prognosis
Compliance with ethical standards
This research was supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2015 (6-2015-0052).
Conflict of interest
Dae Chul Jung has received a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Medicine for 2015 (6-2015-0052). The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.
- 6.Ko JJ, Xie W, Kroeger N, et al. (2015) The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model as a prognostic tool in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with first-line targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(3):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Pilanci KN, Ordu C, Akpinar H, et al. (2014) Dramatic Response to Catumaxomab Treatment for Malign Ascites Related to Renal Cell Carcinoma With Sarcomatoid Differentiation. Am J TherGoogle Scholar