Based on in vitro studies, it is known that androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression. Therefore, we hypothesised that ADT improves the performance of PSMA-PET imaging in primary staging of prostate cancer. The purpose of the study was to demonstrate the time course effect of ADT on PSMA uptake in different types of metastatic lesions evaluated with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI.
Nine men with treatment-naïve prostate cancer were enrolled to a prospective, registered (NCT03313726) clinical trial. A 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI was performed once before and 3 times post-ADT (degarelix, Firmagon). Change of maximum standardised uptake values (SUVmax) in prostate, lymph nodes, bone metastases, and physiologically PSMA-avid organs were evaluated in a time frame of 1–8 weeks.
All patients reached castration levels within 10 days, and 50% decrease in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration was observed 14 days post-ADT. A heterogeneous increase in PSMA uptake was observed 3 to 4 weeks post-ADT. This phenomenon was definitively more evident in bone metastases: 13 (57%) of the metastasis, with a mean (range) SUVmax increase of 77% (8–238%). In one patient, already having bone metastases at baseline, three new bone metastases were observed post-ADT. Of lesions with reduced SUVmax, none disappeared.
Both in patient and region level, increase in PSMA uptake post-ADT is heterogenous and is seen most evidently in bone metastases. Preliminary results on a small cohort of patients suggest the clinical impact of ADT on improving the performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET in staging seems to be minor. However, the optimal imaging time point might be 3 to 4 weeks post-ADT. Since none of the metastases with decreasing SUVmax disappeared, it seems that short-term usage of ADT does not interfere with the interpretation of 68Ga-PSMA PET.
NCT03313726, registered 18 October 2017; EUDRA-CT, 2017-002345-29.
Currently, small-molecule imaging with gallium- or fluoride-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (68Ga/18F-PSMA) has been rapidly taken into clinical use in many European countries [1,2,3], although its utility in primary staging of prostate cancer still needs further validation [4,5,6]. At present, according to the majority of published data, the main indication of 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging is re-staging in presence of biochemical recurrence, especially at low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values . However, in recent years, there has been also a growing evidence on the promising role of 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging in nodal and distant staging in patients with high-risk disease .
Based on in vitro studies and animal models, it is known that administration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) increases PSMA expression [9, 10]. Although this notion was primarily published more than 20 years ago , first clinical case report was published only 2 years ago. Hope et al. demonstrated a 7-fold increase in maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of PSMA uptake after the initiation of ADT . However, in two recent series, the effect of ADT on PSMA-PET findings was deemed as heterogeneous [11, 12]. However, in both of these series, all the metastases were analysed as whole and no region-based analysis was performed. In addition, no data is present if increase is also seen in physiologically avid organs. According to previous published data, we hypothesised that ADT might improve the performance of PSMA-PET imaging in primary staging of prostate cancer. In addition, the hypothesis was that different regions of prostate cancer (primary tumour in prostate and metastases in lymph nodes, bone, viscera) and physiologically avid organs as well (salivary glands, kidneys, liver, and spleen) respond differently to ADT.
The purpose of the current study is to demonstrate in patient and region-based analysis of the time course effect of ADT on PSMA uptake observed in repeated 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI scans in men with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients.
Materials and methods
Study population and design
In this prospective, registered (NCT03313726) clinical trial, men with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, high-risk prostate cancer with high risk for metastases were enrolled. In seven patients, 12-core TRUS-guided biopsies were performed, while in two patients suffering from urinary retention, the diagnosis was made from specimens obtained from transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The inclusion criteria were (1) histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and (2) no previous surgical, radiation, or endocrine treatment of the prostate cancer. Exclusion criteria were (1) presence of uncontrolled serious infection and (2) contraindications for MRI imaging. Also, since 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, namely finasterid and dutasterid, affect the steroid pathway and possibly the PSMA uptake, men with prior usage of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor medication in the past 12 months were excluded.
A 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI was performed before and 3 times after the subcutaneous administration of ADT (degarelix). The post-ADT PSMA-PET/MRI scans were performed at a mean (range) of 1.5 (0.8–2.5) weeks, 2.9 (1.9–4.5) weeks, and 6.2 (3.5–8.7), respectively.
PSA and testosterone blood samples were collected before every scan. After the study, all patients were treated based on current institutional guidelines.
The study was conducted in compliance with the current revision of Declaration of Helsinki guiding physicians and medical research involving human subjects (64th World Medical Association General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, 2013). All patients signed a written informed consent, and the study received the approval of Finnish Medicines Agency (FIMEA; EUDRA-CT, 2017-002345-29) and the Ethical Committee of the Hospital District of Southwest Finland.
PSMA-PET/MRI imaging protocol
PSMA-PET/MRI scans were performed using a sequential Philips Ingenuity time-of-flight (TF) PET/MR scanner (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH). All patient received an intravenous injection of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (mean ± SD administered activity, 153 ± 10 MBq). After 20 min from radiotracer injection, MRI scanning protocol started with T2-weighted turbo-spin-eco sequences in transaxial, coronal, and sagittal direction, and diffusion-weighted sequence using a dedicated external coil for the lower abdomen (SENSE-TORSOXL). Subsequently, whole-body T2-weighted and an MRI-based attenuation correction sequence were obtained. PET whole-body acquisition from the orbital region to the mid-thighs (approximately 10 table positions, 4 min/table) started 64 ± 3 min (mean ± SD) from radiotracer injection. PET imaging reconstructions were performed using the default reconstruction algorithm “Blob-OS-TF”, a 3D ordered subset iterative TOF reconstruction technique. The reconstruction used 3 iterations and 33 subsets in 144 × 144 matrix with an isotropic voxel size of 4 mm. All reconstructions included the necessary corrections for image quantification: attenuation, random, scatter, dead-time, decay, and detector normalisation.
Image analysis was performed using an AW 4.5 workstation by General Electrics (GE) Healthcare. Two experienced nuclear medicine physicians analysed the images blinded for the results of the other reader but unblinded for other imaging modalities and clinical data available. In case of equivocal findings, a consensus between the two readers was reached in a multidisciplinary board meeting.
Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn on PSMA positive prostate lesions, lymph nodes, and bone metastases. Similar VOIs were drawn in salivary glands (parotid, submandibular, and sublingual), liver, spleen, and kidneys (avoiding the renal pelvis). PSMA uptake was measured using the standardised uptake value maximum (SUVmax) values and ΔSUVmax at different time points was calculated compared to the pre-ADT scan.
Findings on PSMA-PET scans were interpreted according to the current suggested procedure guideline on 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging, taking into consideration normal biodistribution of the tracer and possible pitfalls . PSMA-positivity was defined as a focal tracer uptake higher than adjacent background on prostate, suspicious bone, and lymph node lesions, without using a strict cut-off value of SUVmax to indicate or confirm malignancy. Moreover, any anatomical or functional correspondence on MRI imaging, such as altered signal on T2w and/or diffusion restriction on DWI or LN diameter and morphology, was also used in guiding the interpretation.
In order to differentiate the effect of ADT in region level in Figs. 2 and 3, and Table 3, lesions were divided and analysed in two groups: “decrease”, lesions in which, when comparing to baseline, change in SUVmax was constantly negative in every time point; “increase”, all other lesions. In Table 3, the two groups were further analysed by evaluating the maximum increase and maximum decrease in SUVmax from each lesion by selecting a time point at which the highest or the lowest SUVmax occurred. At this specific time point, the change in SUVmax was described as mean proportion (range) and the time point as mean weeks (range). To evaluate inter-reader agreement, Cohen’s Kappa (95% CI) was calculated.
Nine patients were included in the study. Patients’ characteristics are shown in Table 1. At baseline, five had metastatic prostate cancer (other than regional lymph nodes and/or bone), while four patients presented with local or locally advanced disease. Visceral metastases were not present in any of the patients. All patients reached castration levels (serum testosterone < 1.7 nmol/L) within a period of 10 days after the initiation of ADT. Eight patients completed all the four PET/MRI scans, while one patient performed only three scans due to study withdrawal.
Patient-based observations are depicted in Fig. 1. In two patients (patients no. 2 and no. 7), no increase in SUVmax was observed, whereas in 7 (78%) patients, a heterogeneous change in PSMA uptake occurred. In patient no. 8, who had two bone metastases already at baseline, three new bone metastases were observed post-ADT.
A region-based analysis of the primary tumour in prostate, metastatic lesions, and the uptake pattern in physiologically avid organs is depicted in Figs. 2 and 3, and in Table 2. Also, the specific locations of the metastases are presented in Table 3. All the lesions in baseline and in follow-up, except for a discordance in two parailiac lymph node metastases, were detected by the two readers, Cohen’s Kappa 0.89 (95% CI, 0.79–0.99). After a consensus reading, in total, 16 prostate, 16 lymph node, and 23 bone lesions were detected and analysed.
There was a marked increase in SUVmax (maximum increase in SUVmax of 76%) in more than half of the bone metastasis and a less pronounced and not so frequent increase in lesions in prostate (29%), and lymph nodes (19%). The increase was observed within the first 3 to 4 weeks post-ADT. In all lesions, which were considered “decrease”, the maximum SUVmax decrease was 50% or less. Despite the decrease, none of the lesions disappeared during the follow-up.
The most pronounced increase in physiologically avid organs was observed in parotid glands (23%), and submandibular glands (22%). In other physiologically avid organs, the increase was less than 20%. The decrease was seen very seldom or not at all, and the mean decrease was less than 20% (Fig. 4).
In this prospective registered study, a heterogeneous increase of PSMA uptake was observed after ADT in treatment-naïve prostate cancer patients in repeated 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI scans. The most evident increase in SUVmax was observed 3 to 4 weeks post-ADT especially in bone metastasis. In one patient, with bone metastases already at baseline, three new bone metastases, which were already visible anatomically on MRI images, were observed. Of those lesions with decreasing SUVmax, none disappeared.
It has already been demonstrated that in both androgen-sensitive and androgen-resistant human prostate adenocarcinoma cells (LNCaP), the expression of PSMA is upregulated post-ADT and downregulated in the presence of testosterone or DHT [14,15,16]. Although a case report published by Hope et al. corroborated these preclinical studies, demonstrating a 7-fold increase in PSMA SUVmax values after the initiation of ADT, our results are in line with the two very recently published studies [10,11,12]. Aggarwal et al. performed a study in eight patients, scanned with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET before and after the initiation of ADT within a variable period of 2–4 weeks. The study demonstrated a heterogeneous increase in SUVmax, in 68% and in 41% of lesions in castration-sensitive men (n = 4) and in castration-resistant men (n = 4), respectively. The other study, conducted by Emmet et al., studied also both castration-sensitive (n = 8) and castration-resistant men (n = 7). Although they showed that the increase was more evidently seen in castration-resistant men, in the light of our data and the study by Aggarwal, it seems that the increase occurs also in castration-sensitive men. In fact, in the study by Emmet et al., of those eight men with castration-sensitive disease, half of them had Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. It might well be that the increase is more evidently seen in poorly differentiated tumours. Also, our study clearly demonstrates the biological difference between testosterone flare and PSMA flare. Since degarelix directly inhibits the action of GnRH, no PSA flare occurs, and serum testosterone decreases rapidly. Despite the rapid decrease in testosterone levels, the increase in PSMA uptake was still observed.
ADT is the gold standard treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The effect of continuous long-term ADT on reducing the visibility of castration-sensitive prostate cancer lesions on PSMA-PET has already been investigated; however, it is still uncertain if initiation of ADT could interfere with the staging results . According to our preliminary findings, as none of the lesions disappeared during the observational period, ongoing short-term ADT does not represent a contraindication on performing a staging PSMA-PET. Although ADT did not significantly increase PSMA-PET staging performance as only in one patient new metastases were found, PSMA activity in the majority metastatic lesion reached the highest uptake 3 to 4 weeks post-ADT. Therefore, this time window might improve the detection rate, providing better lesion to background ratio. This aspect might be interesting especially in an oligometastatic disease, where bone metastases detected could then be selectively treated with radiotherapy. However, further studies are warranted to investigate the possible clinical impact of the phenomenon.
Since this is the first study where changes in PSMA SUVmax values were analysed on a region-based analysis, the fact that we observed the increase most evidently in bone metastasis is also interesting. This notion is supported also by two case reports demonstrating a similar increase of PSMA uptake in bone metastasis [18, 19]. Although the biology of the phenomenon is not known, authors hypothesised that increase of PSMA uptake in bone might be caused by osteoblastic turn over or bone reparation processes. However, most probably, this is not the case, since we observed the increase also in lymph nodes, in primary tumours, and in some of the physiologically avid organs suggesting a more general rather than organ-specific mechanism. This is, in fact, the first study to report that changes in PSMA-PET findings post-ADT are not restricted only to tumour tissue.
One might also question whether this flare phenomenon is dependent on the different mechanisms of action of ADT treatments. However, our results with GnRH antagonist therapy are similar with previous studies, in which LhRH agonist, antiandrogens, or new androgen signalling pathway modulators were administered [10,11,12, 16]. Given these facts, it seems rather evident that PSMA is connected to the androgen pathway [10,11,12, 16]. More recently, also mTOR pathway with mTOR inhibitor, rapamycin has shown to be linked to increase in PSMA uptake [16, 20]. Taken this all together, one might hypothesise that the observed effects of ADT on PSMA uptake in lesion level depict the androgen sensitivity of the specific lesions and also potentially the heterogeneity in aggressiveness of the lesions. Therefore, could it be possible to select those lesions that are prone to progress or are insensitive to ADT and selectively treat only those lesions? To understand this phenomenon, further studies with larger number of patients and longer follow-up are warranted.
Moreover, understanding what lies behind this phenomenon might raise a great interest from a theragnostic perspective. A preclinical study on a mouse model of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) demonstrated that pre-treatment with enzalutamide for 21 days followed by 177Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) resulted in a significantly enhanced RLT-induced DNA-damage. However, pre-treatment with androgen receptor blockade did not show any additive effect on tumour growth reduction, suggesting that ADT might not necessarily guarantee an increased efficacy of RLT . Nevertheless, considering the heterogeneity of PSMA expression and the lack of clinical studies about this specific theragnostic aspect, the possible synergistic effect of ADT + RLT still needs to be defined.
Moreover, although 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy is at the present moment used in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients, there are ongoing clinical trials to study its use also in castration-sensitive patients . If proven to be effective in castration-sensitive men, according to our data, it would be reasonable to hypothesise that the timing between administration of ADT and of 177Lu-PSMA radionuclide therapy is crucial. ADT could increase the tumour targeting and therefore increase the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA treatment during the time window of maximum PSMA uptake.
Also, our finding of increased PSMA uptake in normal salivary glands post-ADT needs to be taken into account as a possible increased therapy-related risk factor for significant xerostomia in patient candidates for 177Lu-PSMA therapy.
The study has some limitations. First, the cohort is small and underpowered to infer firm conclusions. In addition, there is variability in time intervals of the scans between the different patients. Therefore, the results should be considered preliminary and the study as a proof of concept. However, all the patients were thoroughly examined, and eight of the nine patients completed the study by undergoing four sequential PSMA-PET/MRI scans. In addition, the strength of the study is its truly prospective and registered nature. Second, the cohort is heterogenous. However, this can also be seen as an advantage since with this cohort, we are able to demonstrate that, although the increase is minor, PSMA flare is not merely seen in metastatic patients.
Both in patient and region level, a heterogeneous increase of PSMA uptake was observed post-ADT, observed most evidently in bone metastases. The highest response on PSMA uptake was observed 3 to 4 weeks after ADT. Although the impact of ADT on 68Ga-PSMA PET staging performance was minor in this small patient cohort, more research is needed to investigate whether ADT could significantly improve detection rate and have clinical impact in patients with oligometastatic disease. Moreover, results were encouraging that short-term usage of ADT does not seem to represent a contraindication to perform 68Ga-PSMA PET for staging purpose, since none of the lesions disappeared.
Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40(4):486–95.
Maurer T, Gschwend JE, Rauscher I, et al. Diagnostic efficacy of (68)gallium-PSMA positron emission tomography compared to conventional imaging for lymph node staging of 130 consecutive patients with intermediate to high risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1436–43.
Bailey J, Piert M. Performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer management at initial staging and time of biochemical recurrence. Curr Urol Rep. 2017;18(11):84.
Hofman MS, Hicks RJ, Maurer T, Eiber M. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET: clinical utility in prostate cancer, normal patterns, pearls, and pitfalls. Radiographics. 2018;38(1):200–17.
Von Eyben FE, Picchio M, von Eyben R, et al. 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ligand positron emission tomography/computed tomography for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. 2018;4(5):686–93.
Fanti S, Minozzi S, Antoch G, et al. Consensus on molecular imaging and theranostics in prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(12):e696–708.
Perera M, Papa N, Christidis, et al. Sensitivity, specificity and predictors of positive 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70(6):926–37.
Corfield J, Perera M, Bolton D, et al. 68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) for primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. World J Urol. 2018;36(4):519–27.
Wright GL Jr, Grob BM, Haley C, et al. Upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen after androgen-deprivation therapy. Urology. 1996;48(2):326–34.
Hope TA, Truillet C, Ehman EC, et al. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging of response to androgen receptor inhibition: first human experience. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:81–4.
Aggarwal R, Wei X, Kim W, et al. Heterogeneous flare in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography tracer uptake with initiation of androgen pathway blockade in metastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(1):78–82.
Emmett LM, Yin C, Crumbaker M, et al. Rapid modulation of PSMA expression by androgen deprivation: serial 68Ga PSMA-11 PET in men with hormone sensitive and castrate resistant prostate cancer commencing androgen blockade. J Nucl Med. 2019;60(7):950–4.
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, et al. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT joint EANM and SNMMI procedure guideline for prostate cancer imaging: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(6):1014–24.
Bakht MK, Oh SW, Youn H, et al. Influence of androgen deprivation therapy on the uptake of PSMA-targeted agents: emerging opportunities and challenges. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;51:202–11.
Meller B, Bremmer F, Sahlmann CO, et al. Alterations in androgen deprivation enhanced prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate cancer cells as a target for diagnostics and therapy. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:66.
Kranzbühler B, Salemi S, Umbricht CA, et al. Pharmacological upregulation of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate cancer cells. Prostate. 2018;78(10):758–65.
Afshar-Oromieh A, Debus N, Uhrig M, et al. Impact of long-term androgen deprivation therapy on PSMA ligand PET/CT in patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(12):2045–54.
Zacho HD, Petersen LJ. Bone flare to androgen deprivation therapy in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer on 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(11):e404–6.
Zukotynski KA, Valliant J, Bénard F, et al. Flare on serial prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT examinations in castration-resistant prostate cancer: first observations. Clin Nucl Med. 2018;43(3):213–6.
Cinar B, De Benedetti A, Freeman MR. Post-transcriptional regulation of the androgen receptor by mammalian target of rapamycin. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2547–53.
Lückerath K, Wei L, Fendler WP, et al. Preclinical evaluation of PSMA expression in response to androgen receptor blockade for theranostics in prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2018;8(1):96.
Privé B, Nagarajah J Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in low volume metastatic prostate cancer. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03828838. NLM identifier: NCT03828838. Accessed June 15, 2019.
Open access funding provided by University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital. This study was funded by academic grants from Finnish Cancer Society and Hospital District of Southwest Finland.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ettala, O., Malaspina, S., Tuokkola, T. et al. Prospective study on the effect of short-term androgen deprivation therapy on PSMA uptake evaluated with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in men with treatment-naïve prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 47, 665–673 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04635-7
- Prostate cancer
- androgen deprivation therapy