Dynamic patterns of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in recurrent prostate cancer lesions
- 202 Downloads
Dual-time point PET/CT scanning with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PC) has been advanced as a method to increase detection of PC lesions, particularly at early stages of biochemical recurrence and as a potential means to aid the discrimination between benign and pathological prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake. However, the assumption that all PC lesions uniformly exhibit increasing tracer uptake at delayed imaging has not yet been investigated, which this present study aims to address.
One hundred consecutive patients with biochemically recurrent PC who received standard and late [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT (by local protocol at 1.5 h “standard” and 2.5 h p.i. “late”) underwent retrospective evaluation. All lesions with a tracer uptake above local background were analysed with regard to their maximum standardised uptake values at standard and late images (SUVmax) and characterised according to their morphological characteristics.
Seventy-nine of 100 patients had PSMA-positive scans, in whom a total of 185 individual PSMA-positive lesions were identified. These were morphologically characterised as bone lesions (n = 48), solid organ lesions (n = 3), lymph node (LN) lesions (n = 78) and locally recurrent lesions in the prostatic fossa or seminal vesicles (n = 56). The relative uptake between standard and late imaging was considered; all lesions classified as local recurrence presented with increasing (86%) or stable patterns of tracer uptake (14%). In contrast, only 58% of bone lesions exhibited increasing tracer uptake, with 21% exhibiting a stable pattern and 21% exhibiting a decreasing tracer uptake at late imaging.
A heterogeneous pattern of dynamic tracer uptake was observed, with a largely increasing pattern observed for locally recurrent lesions and lymph nodes and a significant proportion of bone lesions exhibiting decreasing tracer uptake. The results are of significance not only in the imaging and identification of PC lesions, but they also have implications for PSMA-directed ligand therapy.
KeywordsProstate cancer PET/CT Positron emission tomography PSMA Prostate-specific membrane antigen Ganglion
This thesis forms part of the doctorial thesis of I Alberts.
Compliance with ethical standards
All patients published in this manuscript signed a written informed consent form for the purpose of anonymised evaluation and the publication of their data. This evaluation was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Bern (KEK-Nr. 2018-00299).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Fossati N, Karnes RJ, Colicchia M, Boorjian SA, Bossi A, Seisen T, et al. Impact of early salvage radiation therapy in patients with persistently elevated or rising prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.07.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-013-2525-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Afshar-Oromieh A, Holland-Letz T, Giesel FL, Kratochwil C, Mier W, Haufe S, et al. Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) PET/CT in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: evaluation in 1007 patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1258–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3711-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, Holland-Letz T, Linhart HG, Eder M, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, Hadaschik BA, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Afshar-Oromieh A, Sattler LP, Steiger K, Holland-Letz T, da Cunha ML, Mier W, et al. Tracer uptake in mediastinal and paraaortal thoracic lymph nodes as a potential pitfall in image interpretation of PSMA ligand PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1179–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3965-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Afshar-Oromieh A, Sattler LP, Mier W, Hadaschik BA, Debus J, Holland-Letz T, et al. The clinical impact of additional late PET/CT imaging with (68)Ga-PSMA-11 (HBED-CC) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2017;58:750–5. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.116.183483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kratochwil C, Benesova M, Eder M, Neels OC, et al. The theranostic PSMA ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by PET/CT: biodistribution in humans, radiation dosimetry, and first evaluation of tumor lesions. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1697–705. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.161299.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Osborne JR, Kalidindi TM, Punzalan BJ, Gangangari K, Spratt DE, Weber WA, et al. Repeatability of [(68)Ga]DKFZ11-PSMA PET scans for detecting prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive prostate cancer. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19:944–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-017-1091-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A, Seifert R, Wagner S, Schafers M, Bogemann M, et al. Diagnostic performance of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:2055–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4089-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Giesel FL, Knorr K, Spohn F, Will L, Maurer T, Flechsig P, et al. Detection efficacy of (18)F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in 251 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2019;60:362–8. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.212233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wieser G, Popp I, Christian Rischke H, Drendel V, Grosu AL, Bartholoma M, et al. Diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer with PET/CT imaging using the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor antagonist (68)Ga-RM2: preliminary results in patients with negative or inconclusive [(18)F]Fluoroethylcholine-PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:1463–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3702-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.EANM’15, 28th Annual EANM Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine 2015, 10-14 October 2015, Hamburg, Germany. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2015;42 Suppl 1:S1-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-015-3198-z.
- 37.Perera M, Papa N, Christidis D, Wetherell D, Hofman MS, Murphy DG, et al. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of positive (68)Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in advanced prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:926–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar