New insight on the correlation of metabolic status on 18F-FDG PET/CT with immune marker expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
- 118 Downloads
Metabolic information obtained through 18F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is used to evaluate malignancy by calculating the glucose uptake rate, and these parameters play important roles in determining the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The expression of immune-related markers in tumor tissue reflects the immune status in the tumor microenvironment. However, there is lack of reports on the association between metabolic variables and intra-tumor immune markers. Herein, we investigate the correlation between metabolic status on 18F-FDG PET/CT and intra-tumor immunomarkers’ expression in NSCLC patients.
From April 2008 to August 2014, 763 patients were enrolled in the analysis to investigate the role of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in lung cancer. One hundred twenty-two tumor specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to intra-tumor immune cells and programmed death protein ligand 1(PD-L1) expression on tumor cells. The correlation between metabolic variables and the expression of tissue immune markers were analyzed.
SUVmax values have significant variations in different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) statuses (wild type vs mutant type), high/low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) groups, and high/low platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). SUVmax was an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer patients (p = 0.013). IHC demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between SUVmax and the expression of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p = 0.015), CD163 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (p = 0.003), and Foxp3-regulatory T cells (Tregs) (p = 0.004), as well as PD-1 and PD-L1 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.012, respectively). With respect to patient outcomes, disease stage, BMI, SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), TLG (tumor lesion glycolysis), CD163-TAMs, CD11c-dendritic cells (DCs), PD-L1, and Tregs showed a statistically significant correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001, 0.023, < 0.001, 0.007, 0.005, 0.004, 0.008, 0.048, and 0.014, respectively), and disease stage, SUVmax, MTV, TLG, CD163-TAMs, CD11c-DCs, and PD-L1 showed a statistically significant correlation with overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.014, 0.012, < 0.001, 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively).
This study revealed an association between metabolic variable and immune cell expression in the tumor microenvironment and suggests that SUVmax on 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a potential predictor for selecting candidates for immunotherapy.
KeywordsNon-small cell lung cancer 18F-FDG PET/CT Standardized uptake value Immunomarkers Prognosis
Non-small cell lung cancer
- 18F-FDG PET/CT
18F-Flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography
Regulatory T cells
Programmed death protein 1
Standardized uptake value
Squamous cell carcinoma
Body mass index
This work was supported by National Natural Science Funds of China (Nos. 81401887 and 81401888).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed consent and ethics statement
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Written informed obtained from each subject complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of TMUCHI.
My study’s involvement with human subjects complies with the Declaration of Helsinki.
- 1.Saintigny P, Burger JA. Recent advances in non-small cell lung cancer biology and clinical management. Discov Med. 2012;13:287–97.Google Scholar
- 2.Ashamalla H, Rafla S, Parikh K, Mokhtar B, Goswami G, Kambam S, et al. The contribution of integrated PET/CT to the evolving definition of treatment volumes in radiation treatment planning in lung cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;63:1016–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.04.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Opoka L, Szolkowska M, Podgajny Z, Kunikowska J, Baranska I, Blasinska-Przerwa K, et al. Assessment of recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer after therapy using CT and Integrated PET/CT. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2013;81:214–20.Google Scholar
- 6.Appelberg R, Moreira D, Barreira-Silva P, Borges M, Silva L, Dinis-Oliveira RJ, et al. The Warburg effect in mycobacterial granulomas is dependent on the recruitment and activation of macrophages by interferon-gamma. Immunology. 2015;145:498–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/imm.12464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol. 2004;22:329–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, Felip E, Perez-Gracia JL, Han JY, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1540–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01281-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:1837–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Na F, Wang J, Li C, Deng L, Xue J, Lu Y. Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on F18-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prediction value for survival and local control in non-small-cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy: meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9:834–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Paesmans M, Berghmans T, Dusart M, Garcia C, Hossein-Foucher C, Lafitte JJ, et al. Primary tumor standardized uptake value measured on fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is of prognostic value for survival in non-small cell lung cancer: update of a systematic review and meta-analysis by the European Lung Cancer Working Party for the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer Staging Project. J Thorac Oncol. 2010;5:612–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181d0a4f5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Liu H, Wu Y, Wang Z, Yao Y, Chen F, Zhang H, et al. Pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as a predictor of response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2013;5:783–9. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.12.34.Google Scholar
- 27.Mak RH, Digumarthy SR, Muzikansky A, Engelman JA, Shepard JA, Choi NC, et al. Role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in predicting epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist. 2011;16:319–26. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wei T, Zhang J, Qin Y, Wu Y, Zhu L, Lu L, et al. Increased expression of immunosuppressive molecules on intratumoral and circulating regulatory T cells in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5:2190–201.Google Scholar
- 34.Bille A, Okiror L, Skanjeti A, Errico L, Arena V, Penna D, et al. The prognostic significance of maximum standardized uptake value of primary tumor in surgically treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients: analysis of 413 cases. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14:149–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2012.04.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Lopci E, Toschi L, Grizzi F, Rahal D, Olivari L, Castino GF, et al. Correlation of metabolic information on FDG-PET with tissue expression of immune markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are candidates for upfront surgery. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1954–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3425-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Spranger S, Koblish HK, Horton B, Scherle PA, Newton R, Gajewski TF. Mechanism of tumor rejection with doublets of CTLA-4, PD-1/PD-L1, or IDO blockade involves restored IL-2 production and proliferation of CD8(+) T cells directly within the tumor microenvironment. J Immunother Cancer. 2014;2:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/2051-1426-2-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar