Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 26, Issue 3, pp 137–142 | Cite as

Helical CT of talar fractures

  • Richard J. Wechsler
  • Mark E. Schweitzer
  • David Karasick
  • Diane M. Deely
  • Jeffrey B. Glaser
Review Article


Since the degree of comminution, fracture alignment, and articular congruity of talar fractures are important determinants of treatment, we review the helical CT technique for detecting and assessing the extent of acute talar fractures. Helical CT can be used to classify talar neck fractures which often cannot be determined by radiography. It is also useful in detecting posterior process, lateral process, and avulsion fractures, as well as acute osteochondral fractures. Multiplanar CT using 1-mm acquisitions allows optimal evaluation, detects fractures initially missed on radiographs, and determines further extent of fractures.

Key words

Talar injury Talar fracture Helical CT 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Baumhauer JF, Alvarez RG. Contro- versies in treating talus fractures. Ort- hop Clin North Am 1995; 26: 335–351.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adelaar R. The treatment of complex fractures of the talus. Orthop Clin North Am 1989; 20: 691–707.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wechsler RJ, Karasick D, Schweitzer ME. Computed tomography of talocal- caneal coalition: imaging techniques. Skeletal Radiol 1992; 21: 353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sarrafian S. Anatomy of the foot and ankle, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lowery RBW. Fractures of the talus and calcaneus. Curr Opin Orthop 1994; 5: 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heckman JD, McLean MR. Fractures of the lateral process of the talus. Clin Orthop 1985; 199: 108–113.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wells D, Oloff-Solomon J. Radio- graphic evaluation of transchondral fractures of the talus. J Foot Ankle Surg 1987; 26: 186–192.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ly PN, Fallat LM. Transchondral frac- tures of the talus: a review of 64 surgi- cal cases. J Foot Ankle Surg 1993; 32: 352–374.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Anderson IF, Crichton KJ, Gratten-Smith T, Cooper RA, Brazier D. Os- teochondral fractures of the dome of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71: 1143–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pennal GF. Fractures of the talus. Clin Orthop 1963; 30: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abrahams TG, Gallup L, Avery FL. Nondisplaced shearing-type talar body fractures. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 23: 891–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Magid D, Michelson JD, Ney DR, Fishman EK. Adult ankle fractures: comparison of plain films and interac- tive two- and three-dimensional scans. AJR 1990; 154: 1017–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ney DR, Fishman EK, Kawashima A, Robertson, Jr DP, Scott WW. Compari- son of helical and serial CT with re- gard to three-dimensional imaging of musculoskeletal anatomy. Radiology 1992; 185: 865–869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Skeletal Society 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Wechsler
    • 1
  • Mark E. Schweitzer
    • 1
  • David Karasick
    • 1
  • Diane M. Deely
    • 1
  • Jeffrey B. Glaser
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyThomas Jefferson University HospitalPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Jefferson Medical CollegePhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations