Advertisement

Pediatric ankle injuries: utilizing the Dias-Tachdjian classification

  • Christy B. PomeranzEmail author
  • Roger J. Bartolotta
Review Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

Pediatric ankle injuries require timely diagnosis due to their involvement of the distal tibial physis and subsequent impact on long bone growth. These injuries occur in a predictable pattern based on ankle position, direction of force, and degree of closure of the distal tibial physis. The Dias-Tachdjian classification describes possible ankle injury patterns for the completely open physis, and we present a simplified algorithm for applying this system in routine radiographic interpretation. Similar to the Lauge-Hansen classification in adults, the Dias-Tachdjian system is based on the position of the foot and direction of force at the time of injury with four major patterns: supination-inversion, pronation-eversion external rotation, supination-plantar flexion, and supination-external rotation. In addition, we examine the effect that the closing distal tibial physis has on adolescent fracture patterns (specifically, Tillaux and triplane fractures). Awareness of these injury patterns helps the radiologist to identify nondisplaced fractures and subtle physeal injuries with implications for surgical and/or conservative management.

Keywords

Pediatric ankle fracture Distal tibia fracture Premature physeal closure Salter-Harris classification Dias-Tachdjian classification 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Xochitl Vinaja MS, CMI for her extensive help with the medical illustrations in this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Eismann EA, Stephan ZA, Mehlman CT, Denning J, Mehlman T, Parikh SN, et al. Pediatric triplane ankle fractures: impact of radiographs and computed tomography on fracture classification and treatment planning. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(12):995–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D’Angelo F, Solarino G, Tanas D, Zani A, Cherubino P, Moretti B. Outcome of distal tibia physeal fractures: a review of cases as related to risk factors. Injury. 2017;48(Suppl 3):S7–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salter RB, Harris WR. Injuries involving the epiphyseal plate. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1963;45:587–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yde J. The Lauge Hansen classification of malleolar fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1980;51(1):181–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shariff SS, Nathwani DK. Lauge-Hansen classification: a literature review. Injury. 2006;37(9):888–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dias LS, Tachdjian MO. Physeal injuries of the ankle in children: classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;136:230–3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mac Nealy GA, Rogers LF, Hernandez R, Poznanski AK. Injuries of the distal tibial epiphysis: systematic radiograph evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 1982;138(4):683–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Von Laer L. Classification, diagnosis, and treatment of transitional fractures of the distal part of the tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(5):687–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kärrholm J, Hansson LI, Laurin S. Pronation injuries of the ankle in children. Retrospective study of radiographical classification and treatment. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;54(1):1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kärrholm J, Hansson LI, Laurin S. Supination-adduction injuries of the ankle in children-radiographical classification and treatment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1983;101(3):193–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guler F, Kose O, Celiktas M, Turan A. Adult-type bimalleolar ankle fracture in children: report of two cases. Foot Ankle Spec. 2013;6(5):376–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Halai M, Jamal B, Rea P, Qureshi M, Pillai A. Acute fractures of the pediatric foot and ankle. Worl J Pediatr. 2015;11(1):14–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaya A, Altay T, Ozturk H, Karapinar L. Open reduction and internal fixation in displaced juvenile Tillaux fractures. Injury. 2007;38(2):201–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Binkley A, Mehlman CT, Freeh E. Salter-Harris II ankle fractures in children: does fracture pattern matter? J Orthop Trauma. 2019;33(5):e190–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spiegel PG, Cooperman DR, Laros GS. Epiphyseal fractures of the distal ends of the tibia and fibula. A retrospective study of two hundred and thirty-seven cases in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(8):1046–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blackburn EW, Aronsson DD, Rubright JH, Lisle JW. Ankle fractures in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(13):1234–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weill Cornell Medical College1300 York AvenueNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyNewYork-Presbyterian HospitalNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations