Advertisement

Ultrasound localization of lacerated flexor tendon ends in the hand: a cadaveric study

  • David A. Alvarez
  • David H. BallardEmail author
  • Trevor Carroll
  • Clifton Frilot
  • Alberto A. Simoncini
Scientific Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

Flexor tendon repair currently requires extensive exposure to locate and repair tendons. Ultrasound (US) has been used to identify lacerated tendon ends with little information on accuracy. This study was designed to measure the accuracy of US to localize tendon ends in zone II flexor tendon lacerations in a cadaveric model.

Materials and methods

US was used to locate tendon ends in zone II lacerations of fingers of six cadaveric hands (96 tendon ends) by a musculoskeletal radiologist. The distance of each tendon end relative to the laceration was recorded. Specimens were dissected and tendon position was compared to US position.

Results

The radiologist correctly identified full-thickness lacerations of both superficial and deep tendons 99.0% (n = 05/96 tendons) of the time. The average difference between mean US predicted retraction and anatomic confirmed retraction for all digits all tendons was 3.5 mm of underestimation. US correctly identified the position of all tendon stumps to within 10 mm 92.7% (n = 89/96 tendons) of the time and 69.8% (n = 67/96 tendons) of the time to within 5 mm. Error tended to underestimate (61.5%; 59/96 tendons) rather than overestimate retraction (29.2%; 28/96 tendons).

Conclusions

This fresh cadaveric study has demonstrated that with an experienced radiologist, there was 99.0% accuracy identifying a completed tendon tear and locating the tendon ends with US to within 1 cm was 92.7% accurate.

Keywords

Flexor tendon Hand ultrasound Tendon injury Tendon surgery Ultrasound 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Anne M Hollister and Alan Ogden for their contributions.

Funding

Dr. Ballard receives salary support from National Institutes of Health TOP-TIER grant T32-EB021955.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1.
    Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS. Green's operative hand surgery. 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2017.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fornage BD, Rifkin MD. Ultrasound examination of the hand. Radiology. 1986;160:853–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kovacs P, Bodner G. High-resolution ultrasonography of the annular pulley system of the hand. Orthopade. 2002;31:284–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schoffl VR, Schoffl I. Injuries to the finger flexor pulley system in rock climbers: current concepts. J Hand Surg [Am]. 2006;31A:647–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corduff N, Jones R, Ball J. The role of ultrasound in the management of zone 1 flexor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg (Br). 1994;19:76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McGeorge DD, McGeorge S. Diagnostic medical ultrasound in the management of hand injuries. J Hand Surg(Br). 1990;15:256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee DH, Robbin ML, Galliott R, Graveman VA. Ultrasound evaluation of flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:236–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang PT, Bonavita JA, DeLone FX Jr, McClellan RM, Witham RS. Ultrasonic assistance in the diagnosis of hand flexor tendon injuries. Ann Plast Surg. 1999;42:403–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leonard DA, Damkat-Thomas L, Lewis HG. Is ultrasound indicated in the diagnosis of closed avulsion injuries of the flexor digitorum profundus tendon? J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011;36:522–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ravnic DJ, Galiano RD, Bodavula V, Friedman DW, Flores RL. Diagnosis and localisation of flexor tendon injuries by surgeon-performed ultrasound: a cadaveric study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:234–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsuge K, Steichen JB. Comprehensive atlas of hand surgery. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1989.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khaleghian R, Tonkin LJ, De Geus JJ, Lee JP. Ultrasonic examination of the flexor tendons of the fingers. J Clin Ultrasound. 1984;12:547–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    De Maeseneer M, Jager T, Vanderdood K, Van Roy P, Shahabpour M, Marcelis S. Ultrasound during dissection of cadaveric specimens: a new method for obtaining ultrasound-anatomic correlations in musculoskeletal radiology. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:870–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ballard DH, Campbell KJ, Hedgepeth KB, Hollister AM, Simoncini AA, Pahilan ME, et al. Anatomic guide and sonography for surgical repair of leg muscle lacerations. J Surg Res. 2013;184:178–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of OrthopedicsLSUHSC-ShreveportShreveportUSA
  2. 2.Mallinckrodt Institute of RadiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Department of Rehabilitation Sciences in the School of Allied Health ProfessionsLSUHSC-ShreveportShreveportUSA
  4. 4.Department of RadiologyLSUHSC-ShreveportShreveportUSA

Personalised recommendations