Advertisement

Increased signal in the proximal patellar tendon: normal or pathologic?

  • Elizabeth S. LevinEmail author
  • Benjamin Plotkin
  • Benjamin D. Levine
  • Kambiz Motamedi
  • Lyndsey Burton
  • Leanne L. Seeger
Scientific Article
  • 63 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

To determine the clinical significance of T2 signal hyperintensity in the proximal patellar tendon seen on MRI of the knee.

Materials and methods

MRIs of 100 patients who underwent MRI of the knee between 1 May 2018 and 15 July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. All examinations were performed on 3-Tesla MRI scanners with a dedicated knee coil and in accordance with our institution’s standard knee MRI protocol. The presence of increased T2 signal was assessed on both sagittal and axial T2-weighted fat-saturated images. The amount of increased signal in the proximal patellar tendon on T2-weighted images was characterized as: none, mild, moderate, or severe. A corresponding chart review of the referring physicians’ notes was performed to determine the presence of clinical symptoms of patellar tendinopathy. Patellar tendinopathy was considered present if the clinical notes described tenderness on palpation of the inferior patellar pole, infrapatellar tenderness, or patellar tendinosis/tendinitis.

Results

The majority (66%) of knee MRIs demonstrated the presence of increased T2 signal in the proximal patellar tendon. Only 4.5% of these patients had associated clinical findings of patellar tendinopathy.

Conclusion

Although increased T2 signal in the proximal patellar tendon is a common finding, only in rare cases are there associated clinical symptoms. Thus, increased T2 signal in the proximal patellar tendon may not be a pathological finding in the absence of clinical findings of patellar tendinopathy.

Keywords

Patellar tendon MRI Knee 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Reicher MA, Bassett LW, Gold RH. High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the knee joint: pathologic correlations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(5):903–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nacey NC, Geeslin MG, Miller GW, Pierce JL. Magnetic resonance imaging of the knee: an overview and update of conventional and state of the art imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;45(5):1257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bodne D, Quinn SF, Murray WT, Bolton T, Rudd S, Lewis K, et al. Magnetic resonance images of chronic patellar tendinitis. Skeletal Radiol. 1988;17(1):24–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davies SG, Baudouin CJ, King JB, Perry JD. Ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in patellar tendinitis. Clin Radiol. 1991;43(1):52–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    El-Khoury GY, Wira RL, Berbaum KS, Pope TL Jr, Monu JU. MR imaging of patellar tendinitis. Radiology. 1992;184(3):849–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krampla W, Mayrhofer R, Malcher J, Kristen KH, Urban M, Hruby W. MR imaging of the knee in marathon runners before and after competition. Skeletal Radiol. 2001;30(2):72–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Major NM, Helms CA. MR imaging of the knee: findings in asymptomatic collegiate basketball players. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179(3):641–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McLoughlin RF, Raber EL, Vellet AD, Wiley JP, Bray RC. Patellar tendinitis: MR imaging features, with suggested pathogenesis and proposed classification. Radiology. 1995;197(3):843–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peace KA, Lee JC, Healy J. Imaging the infrapatellar tendon in the elite athlete. Clin Radiol. 2006;61(7):570–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brunner MC, Flower SP, Evancho AM, Allman FL, Apple DF, Fajman WA. MRI of the athletic knee. Findings in asymptomatic professional basketball and collegiate football players. Investig Radiol. 1989;24(1):72–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pappas GP, Vogelsong MA, Staroswiecki E, Gold GE, Safran MR. Magnetic resonance imaging of asymptomatic knees in collegiate basketball players: the effect of one season of play. Clin J Sport Med. 2016;26(6):483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reiff DB, Heenan SD, Heron CW. MRI appearances of the asymptomatic patellar tendon on gradient echo imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24(2):123–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schmid MR, Hodler J, Cathrein P, Duewell S, Jacob HA, Romero J. Is impingement the cause of jumper’s knee? Dynamic and static magnetic resonance imaging of patellar tendinitis in an open-configuration system. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(3):388–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Colosimo AJ, Bassett FH 3rd. Jumper’s knee. Diagnosis and treatment. Orthop Rev. 1990;19(2):139–49.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beltran J, Noto AM, Herman LJ, Lubbers LM. Tendons: high-field-strength, surface coil MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;162(3):735–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Walczak BE, McCulloch PC, Kang RW, Zelazny A, Tedeschi F, Cole BJ. Abnormal findings on knee magnetic resonance imaging in asymptomatic NBA players. J Knee Surg. 2008;21(1):27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yun SJ, Jin W, Park YK, Kim GY, Yoon SH, Park SY, et al. Increased signal intensity at the proximal patellar tendon: correlation between MR imaging and histology in eight cadavers and clinical MR imaging studies. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(10):2976–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bydder M, Rahal A, Fullerton GD, Bydder GM. The magic angle effect: a source of artifact, determinant of image contrast, and technique for imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(2):290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erickson SJ, Cox IH, Hyde JS, Carrera GF, Strandt JA, Estkowski LD. Effect of tendon orientation on MR imaging signal intensity: a manifestation of the “magic angle” phenomenon. Radiology. 1991;181(2):389–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Johnson DP, Wakeley CJ, Watt I. Magnetic resonance imaging of patellar tendonitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78(3):452–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUCLA Health SystemLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations