Skeletal Radiology

, Volume 48, Issue 1, pp 137–141 | Cite as

Interobserver variability and stiffness measurements of normal common extensor tendon in healthy volunteers using shear wave elastography

  • Halit Nahit ŞendurEmail author
  • Emetullah Cindil
  • Mahinur Cerit
  • Nur Betül Demir
  • Aylin Billur Şendur
  • Suna Özhan Oktar
Scientific Article



The purposes of our study are to determine the quantitative elasticity values of normal common extensor tendon (CET) and to assess the interobserver variability of stiffness measurements using shear wave elastography (SWE).

Materials and methods

A total of 60 CETs of 30 (15 female, 15 male, mean age 30.2 years) healthy volunteers without any symptoms of lateral epicondylitis were examined by two radiologists. Age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and dominant hand of all participants were noted. The first observer performed B-mode and SWE imaging, and the second observer performed only SWE imaging. Tendon thickness and stiffness values in kPa were measured.


The mean thickness of CETs was 3.57 ± 0.36 mm. The mean stiffness values of CETs for two observers were 45.28 ± 9.82 kPa and 45.80 ± 9.72 kPa respectively. Tendon thickness had a weak correlation with weight (r = 0.281, p = 0.03), and moderate correlation with stiffness values (r = 0.429, p < 0.001). The mean interobserver difference of CET stiffness measurements was −0.5% of the mean CET stiffness values. Range of measurement error, defined as 95% limits of agreement, was ±23.5%. There was no significant difference between absolute values of interobserver measurements (p = 0.741).


Shear wave elastography is a reproducible imaging technique for the evaluation of CET elasticity and the standard stiffness values of normal CET can be used as reference data to differentiate normal from pathological tissues.


Common extensor tendon Shear wave elastography Interobserver variability 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    Connell D, Burke F, Coombes P, et al. Sonographic examination of lateral epicondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:777–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jaén-Díaz JI, Cerezo-López E, López-de Castro F, et al. Sonographic findings for the common extensor tendon of the elbow in the general population. J Ultrasound Med. 2010;29:1717–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kocyigit F, Kuyucu E, Kocyigit A, et al. Association of real-time sonoelastography findings with clinical parameters in lateral epicondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2016;36(1):91–100.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shiri R, Viikari-Juntura E, Varonen H, Heliövaara M. Prevalence and determinants of lateral and medial epicondylitis: a population study. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;164:1065–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Zordo T, Lill SR, Fink C, et al. Real-time sonoelastography of lateral epicondylitis: comparison of findings between patients and healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(1):180–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miller TT, Shapiro MA, Schultz E, Kalish PE. Comparison of sonography and MRI for diagnosing epicondylitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2002;30:193–202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahn KS, Kang CH, Hong SJ, Jeong WK. Ultrasound elastography of lateral epicondylosis: clinical feasibility of quantitative elastographic measurements. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(5):1094–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Domenichini R, Pialat JB, Podda A, Aubry S. Ultrasound elastography in tendon pathology: state of the art. Skeletal Radiol. 2017;46(12):1643–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Taljanovic MS, Gimber LH, Becker GW, et al. Shear-wave elastography: basic physics and musculoskeletal applications. Radiographics. 2017;37(3):855–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Klauser AS, Miyamoto H, Bellmann-Weiler R, Feuchtner GM, Wick MC, Jaschke WR. Sonoelastography: musculoskeletal applications. Radiology. 2014;272(3):622–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fusini F, Langella F, Busilacchi A, et al. Real-time sonoelastography: principles and clinical applications in tendon disorders. A systematic review. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2018;7(3):467–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dirrichs T, Quack V, Gatz M, Tingart M, Kuhl CK, Schrading S. Shear wave elastography (SWE) for the evaluation of patients with tendinopathies. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(10):1204–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Payne C, Watt P, Cercignani M, Webborn N. Reproducibility of shear wave elastography of the Achilles tendon. Skeletal Radiol. 2018;47(6):779–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tas S, Onur MR, Yılmaz S, Soylu AR, Korkusuz F. Shear wave elastography is a reliable and repeatable method for measuring the elastic modulus of the rectus femoris muscle and patellar tendon. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(3):565–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Toprak U, Baskan B, Ustuner E, et al. Common extensor tendon thickness measurements at the radiocapitellar region in the diagnosis of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012;18(6):566–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee MH, Cha JG, Jin W, et al. Utility of sonographic measurement of the common extensor tendon in patients with lateral epicondylitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:1363–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arda K, Ciledag N, Aktas E, Aribas BK, Kose K. Quantitative assessment of normal soft-tissue elasticity using shear wave ultrasound elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197(3):532–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shin HJ, Kim MJ, Kim HY, Roh YH, Lee MJ. Comparison of shear wave velocities on ultrasound elastography between different machines, transducers, and acquisition depths: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(10):3361–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ISS 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyGazi University Faculty of MedicineBeşevler, AnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Lösante Children’s and Adult HospitalAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations