CRISPR-Cas9-assisted native end-joining editing offers a simple strategy for efficient genetic engineering in Escherichia coli
- 97 Downloads
Unlike eukaryotes, prokaryotes are less proficient in homologous recombination (HR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). All existing genomic editing methods for Escherichia coli (E. coli) rely on exogenous HR or NHEJ systems to repair DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Although an E. coli native end-joining (ENEJ) system has been reported, its potential in genetic engineering has not yet been explored. Here, we present a CRISPR-Cas9-assisted native end-joining editing and show that ENEJ-dependent DNA repair can be used to conduct rapid and efficient deletion of chromosome fragments up to 83 kb or gene inactivation. Moreover, the positive rate and editing efficiency are independent of high-efficiency competent cells. The method requires neither exogenous DNA repair systems nor introduced editing template. The Cas9-sgRNA complex is the only foreign element in this method. This study is the first successful engineering effort to utilize ENEJ mechanism in genomic editing and provides an effective strategy for genetic engineering in bacteria that are inefficient in HR and NHEJ.
KeywordsEscherichia coli Genetic engineering CRISPR-Cas9 End-joining Large-fragment deletion
The work finished in Beijing Institute of Technology was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (grant No. 2017YFD0201400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 21676026), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Daniel R, Greger JG, Katz RA, Taganow KD, Wu X, Kappes JC, Skalka AM (2004) Evidence that stable retroviral transduction and cell survival following DNA integration depend on components of the nonhomologous end joining repair pathway. J Virol 78:8573–8581. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.16.8573-8581.2004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Malyarchuk S, Wright D, Castore R, Klepper E, Weiss B, Doherty AJ, Harrison L (2007) Expression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku and Ligase D in Escherichia coli results in RecA and RecB-independent DNA end-joining at regions of microhomology. DNA Repair 6:1413–1424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sambrook J, Russell DW (2006) The inoue method for preparation and transformation of competent E. coli: “ultra-competent” cells. CSH Protoc 2006:418–424. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot3944
- Singh A (2017) Guardians of the mycobacterial genome: a review on DNA repair systems in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microbiology 163:1740–1758. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gew042
- Weller GR, Kysela B, Roy R, Tonkin LM, Scanlan E, Della M, Devine SK, Day JP, Wikinson A, d’Adda di Fagagna F, Devine KM, Bowater RP, Jiggo PA, Jackson SP, Doherty AJ (2002) Identification of a DNA nonhomologous end-joining complex in bacteria. Science 297:1686–1689. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wyman C, Kanaar R (2006) DNA Double-strand break repair: all’s well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 40:363–383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zheng X, Li SY, Zhao GP, Wang J (2017) An efficient system for deletion of large DNA fragments in Escherichia coli via introduction of both Cas9 and the non-homologous end joining system from Mycobacterium smegmatis. Biochem Biophys Res 485:768–774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.02.129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar