Advertisement

Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the production of ethanol and butanol from oxides of carbon

  • Ji Eun Woo
  • Yu-Sin JangEmail author
Mini-Review
  • 96 Downloads

Abstract

The utilized biomass is an important consideration for sustainable biofuel production. To avoid competing with food needs, researchers have turned their attention to non-food lignocellulosic biomasses as potential feedstocks for biofuel production. However, the saccharification of a lignocellulosic biomass produces a large amount of lignin as waste. To overcome this hurdle, biomass gasification has been suggested as an alternative to saccharification. During biomass gasification, oxides of carbon (CO, CO2) and hydrogen are produced as a major product. Accordingly, microorganisms capable of utilizing these oxides of carbon have gained attention as hosts for the production of biofuels, such as ethanol and butanol. In this work, we reviewed the Calvin cycle and Wood-Ljungdahl pathway for utilizing oxides of carbon in cyanobacteria and acetogens, respectively, and discussed the metabolic engineering strategies that may be used to produce ethanol and butanol from oxides of carbon through these routes.

Keywords

Oxides of carbon Ethanol Butanol Calvin cycle Wood-Ljungdahl pathway 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (NRF-2016R1D1A3B04933184).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aboulnaga E-H, Pinkenburg O, Schiffels J, El-Refai A, Buckel W, Selmer T (2013) Effect of an oxygen-tolerant bifurcating butyryl coenzyme A dehydrogenase/electron-transferring flavoprotein complex from Clostridium difficile on butyrate production in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 195:3704–3713Google Scholar
  2. Abrini J, Naveau H, Nyns E-J (1994) Clostridium autoethanogenum, sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium that produces ethanol from carbon monoxide. Arch Microbiol 161(4):345–351Google Scholar
  3. Berlin A, Maximenko V, Gilkes N, Saddler J (2007) Optimization of enzyme complexes for lignocellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(2):287–296.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21238 Google Scholar
  4. Bertsch J, Müller V (2015) Bioenergetic constraints for conversion of syngas to biofuels in acetogenic bacteria. Biotechnol Biofuels 8(1):210Google Scholar
  5. Berzin V, Tyurin M, Kiriukhin M (2013) Selective n-butanol production by Clostridium sp. MTButOH1365 during continuous synthesis gas fermentation due to expression of synthetic thiolase, 3-hydroxy butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, crotonase, butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, butyraldehyde dehydrogenase, and NAD-dependent butanol dehydrogenase. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169(3):950–959.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-012-0060-7 Google Scholar
  6. Calvin M, Benson AA (1948) The path of carbon in photosynthesis. Science 107:476-480.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.107.2784.476
  7. Cheng C, Li W, Lin M, Yang S-T (2019) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium carboxidivorans for enhanced ethanol and butanol production from syngas and glucose. Bioresour Technol 284:415–423Google Scholar
  8. Cherubini F (2010) The biorefinery concept: using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals. Energy Convers Manag 51(7):1412–1421Google Scholar
  9. Cho DH, Lee YJ, Um Y, Sang BI, Kim YH (2009) Detoxification of model phenolic compounds in lignocellulosic hydrolysates with peroxidase for butanol production from Clostridium beijerinckii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83(6):1035–1043.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-1925-8 Google Scholar
  10. Choi YN, Park JM (2016) Enhancing biomass and ethanol production by increasing NADPH production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Bioresour Technol 213:54–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.056 Google Scholar
  11. Choi EB, Lee MW, Park JE, Lee JY, Hong CO, Lee SM, Kim YG, Kim KK (2017a) Photodynamic apoptosis and antioxidant activities of Brassica napus extracts in U937 and SK-HEP-1 cells. Appl Biol Chem 60(4):427–435Google Scholar
  12. Choi JH, Kim Y-G, Lee YK, Pack SP, Jung JY, Jang K-S (2017b) Chemical characterization of dissolved organic matter in moist acidic tussock tundra soil using ultra-high resolution 15T FT-ICR mass spectrometry. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 22(5):637–646Google Scholar
  13. Choi YY, Hong M-E, Chang WS, Sim SJ (2019) Autotrophic biodiesel production from the thermotolerant microalga Chlorella sorokiniana by enhancing the carbon availability with temperature adjustment. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 24(1):223–231Google Scholar
  14. Demmer JK, Pal Chowdhury N, Selmer T, Ermler U, Buckel W (2017) The semiquinone swing in the bifurcating electron transferring flavoprotein/butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase complex from Clostridium difficile. Nat Commun 8:1577Google Scholar
  15. Deng MD, Coleman JR (1999) Ethanol synthesis by genetic engineering in cyanobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(2):523–528Google Scholar
  16. Dexter J, Fu P (2009) Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for ethanol production. Energy Environ Sci 2(8):857–864.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b811937f Google Scholar
  17. Dexter J, Armshaw P, Sheahan C, Pembroke JT (2015) The state of autotrophic ethanol production in cyanobacteria. J Appl Microbiol 119(1):11–24.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12821 Google Scholar
  18. Durre P, Eikmanns BJ (2015) C1-carbon sources for chemical and fuel production by microbial gas fermentation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 35:63–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.03.008 Google Scholar
  19. Ezeji TC, Qureshi N, Blaschek HP (2007) Production of acetone butanol (AB) from liquefied corn starch, a commercial substrate, using Clostridium beijerinckii coupled with product recovery by gas stripping. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 34(12):771–777Google Scholar
  20. Fast AG, Papoutsakis ET (2012) Stoichiometric and energetic analyses of non-photosynthetic CO2-fixation pathways to support synthetic biology strategies for production of fuels and chemicals. Curr Opin Chem Eng 1(4):380–395Google Scholar
  21. Fontaine L, Meynial-Salles I, Girbal L, Yang X, Croux C, Soucaille P (2002) Molecular characterization and transcriptional analysis of adhE2, the gene encoding the NADH-dependent aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase responsible for butanol production in alcohologenic cultures of Clostridium acetobutylicum ATCC 824. J Bacteriol 184(3):821–830Google Scholar
  22. Gao Z, Zhao H, Li Z, Tan X, Lu X (2012) Photosynthetic production of ethanol from carbon dioxide in genetically engineered cyanobacteria. Energy Environ Sci 5(12):9857–9865.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2EE22675H Google Scholar
  23. Grigorieva G, Shestakov S (1982) Transformation in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. 6803. FEMS Microbiol Lett 13(4):367–370Google Scholar
  24. Gui MM, Lee K, Bhatia S (2008) Feasibility of edible oil vs. non-edible oil vs. waste edible oil as biodiesel feedstock. Energy 33(11):1646–1653Google Scholar
  25. Ha S-J, Galazka JM, Kim SR, Choi J-H, Yang X, Seo J-H, Glass NL, Cate JH, Jin Y-S (2011) Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(2):504–509Google Scholar
  26. Harris L, Blank L, Desai R, Welker N, Papoutsakis E (2001) Fermentation characterization and flux analysis of recombinant strains of Clostridium acetobutylicum with an inactivated solR gene. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27(5):322–328Google Scholar
  27. Im HS, Kim C, Song YE, Baek J, Im CH, Kim JR (2019) Isolation of novel CO converting microorganism using zero valent iron for a bioelectrochemical system (BES). Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 24(1):232–239Google Scholar
  28. Jablonsky J, Bauwe H, Wolkenhauer O (2011) Modeling the Calvin-Benson cycle. BMC Syst Biol 5:185.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-185 Google Scholar
  29. Jang YS, Kim B, Shin JH, Choi YJ, Choi S, Song CW, Lee J, Park HG, Lee SY (2012) Bio-based production of C2-C6 platform chemicals. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(10):2437–2459.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24599 Google Scholar
  30. Jin H, Chen L, Wang J, Zhang W (2014) Engineering biofuel tolerance in non-native producing microorganisms. Biotechnol Adv 32(2):541–548.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.02.001 Google Scholar
  31. Jones DT, Woods DR (1986) Acetone-butanol fermentation revisited. Microbiol Rev 50(4):484–524Google Scholar
  32. Jones SW, Fast AG, Carlson ED, Wiedel CA, Au J, Antoniewicz MR, Papoutsakis ET, Tracy BP (2016) CO2 fixation by anaerobic non-photosynthetic mixotrophy for improved carbon conversion. Nat Commun 7:12800.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12800 Google Scholar
  33. Kamm B, Kamm M, Gruber PR, Kromus S (2006) Biorefinery systems–an overviewGoogle Scholar
  34. Kaparaju P, Serrano M, Thomsen AB, Kongjan P, Angelidaki I (2009) Bioethanol, biohydrogen and biogas production from wheat straw in a biorefinery concept. Bioresour Technol 100(9):2562–2568.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.011 Google Scholar
  35. Kim JH, Ryu J, Huh IY, Hong SK, Kang HA, Chang YK (2014) Ethanol production from galactose by a newly isolated Saccharomyces cerevisiae KL17. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 37(9):1871–1878.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-014-1161-1 Google Scholar
  36. Kim E-A, Lee S-Y, Lee S-Y (2016a) Quality characteristics of steamed rice bread prepared with different contents of proteolytic enzyme. Appl Biol Chem 59(1):95–102Google Scholar
  37. Kim M-S, Woo M-H, Chang Y-H, Chung N, Kim J-S (2016b) Biochemical characterization of a noble xylanase from Paenibacillus sp. EC116. Appl Biol Chem 59(2):313–320Google Scholar
  38. Kim SU, Ruangcharus C, Kumar S, Lee HH, Park HJ, Jung ES, Hong CO (2019) Nitrous oxide emission from upland soil amended with different animal manures. Appl Biol Chem 62(1):8Google Scholar
  39. Köpke M, Held C, Hujer S, Liesegang H, Wiezer A, Wollherr A, Ehrenreich A, Liebl W, Gottschalk G, Dürre P (2010) Clostridium ljungdahlii represents a microbial production platform based on syngas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(29):13087–13092Google Scholar
  40. Krishna SH, Reddy TJ, Chowdary G (2001) Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of lignocellulosic wastes to ethanol using a thermotolerant yeast. Bioresour Technol 77(2):193–196Google Scholar
  41. Lai MC, Lan EI (2015) Advances in metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for photosynthetic biochemical production. Metabolites 5(4):636–658.  https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo5040636 Google Scholar
  42. Lan EI, Liao JC (2011) Metabolic engineering of cyanobacteria for 1-butanol production from carbon dioxide. Metab Eng 13(4):353–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.004 Google Scholar
  43. Lan EI, Liao JC (2012) ATP drives direct photosynthetic production of 1-butanol in cyanobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(16):6018–6023.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200074109 Google Scholar
  44. Lan EI, Ro SY, Liao JC (2013) Oxygen-tolerant coenzyme A-acylating aldehyde dehydrogenase facilitates efficient photosynthetic n-butanol biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Energy Environ Sci 6(9):2672–2681.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE41405A Google Scholar
  45. Lee HR, Kazlauskas RJ, Park TH (2017) Mild pretreatment of yellow poplar biomass using sequential dilute acid and enzymatically-generated peracetic acid to enhance cellulase accessibility. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 22(4):405–412Google Scholar
  46. Liew F, Henstra AM, Kpke M, Winzer K, Simpson SD, Minton NP (2017) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium autoethanogenum for selective alcohol production. Metab Eng 40:104–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.01.007 Google Scholar
  47. Lora JH, Glasser WG (2002) Recent industrial applications of lignin: a sustainable alternative to nonrenewable materials. J Polym Environ 10(1):39–48.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021070006895 Google Scholar
  48. Luan G, Qi Y, Wang M, Li Z, Duan Y, Tan X, Lu X (2015) Combinatory strategy for characterizing and understanding the ethanol synthesis pathway in cyanobacteria cell factories. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:184.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0367-z Google Scholar
  49. Machado IM, Atsumi S (2012) Cyanobacterial biofuel production. J Biotechnol 162(1):50–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.03.005 Google Scholar
  50. Madihah M, Ariff A, Sahaid K, Suraini A, Karim M (2001) Direct fermentation of gelatinized sago starch to acetone–butanol–ethanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17(6):567–576Google Scholar
  51. Marchal R, Rebeller M, Vandecasteele J (1984) Direct bioconversion of alkali-pretreated straw using simultanesous enzymatic hydrolysis and acetone-butanol fermentation. Biotechnol Lett 6(8):523–528Google Scholar
  52. Mi S, Gu C, Wu P, Liu H, Yan X, Li D, Tang X, Duan X, Wang G, Zhang J (2018) Improvement of butanol production by the development and co-culture of C. acetobutylicum TSH1 and B. cereus TSH2. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:6753–6763Google Scholar
  53. Mock J, Zheng Y, Mueller AP, Ly S, Tran L, Segovia S, Nagaraju S, Köpke M, Dürre P, Thauer RK (2015) Energy conservation associated with ethanol formation from H2 and CO2 in Clostridium autoethanogenum involving electron bifurcation. J Bacteriol 197(18):2965–2980Google Scholar
  54. Namakoshi K, Nakajima T, Yoshikawa K, Toya Y, Shimizu H (2016) Combinatorial deletions of glgC and phaCE enhance ethanol production in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. J Biotechnol 239:13–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.09.016 Google Scholar
  55. Nishiguchi H, Hiasa N, Uebayashi K, Liao J, Shimizu H, Matsuda F (2019) Transomics data-driven, ensemble kinetic modeling for system-level understanding and engineering of the cyanobacteria central metabolism. Metab Eng 52:273–283Google Scholar
  56. Noh HJ, Woo JE, Lee SY, Jang Y-S (2018) Metabolic engineering of Clostridium acetobutylicum for the production of butyl butyrate. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:8319–8327Google Scholar
  57. Noh HJ, Lee SY, Jang Y-S (2019) Microbial production of butyl butyrate, a flavor and fragrance compound. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103:2079–2086Google Scholar
  58. Palenik B, Brahamsha B, Larimer F, Land M, Hauser L, Chain P, Lamerdin J, Regala W, Allen E, McCarren J (2003) The genome of a motile marine Synechococcus. Nature 424(6952):1037–1042Google Scholar
  59. Park S, Kim H, Cho S, You G, Oh HB, Han JH, Lee J (2019) Enhanced incorporation of gaseous CO2 to succinate by a recombinant Escherichia coli W3110. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng:1–6Google Scholar
  60. Perez J, Munoz-Dorado J, de la Rubia T, Martinez J (2002) Biodegradation and biological treatments of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin: an overview. Int Microbiol 5(2):53–63.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-002-0062-3 Google Scholar
  61. Qureshi N, Saha BC, Dien B, Hector RE, Cotta MA (2010) Production of butanol (a biofuel) from agricultural residues: part I–use of barley straw hydrolysate. Biomass Bioenergy 34(4):559–565Google Scholar
  62. Raines CA (2003) The Calvin cycle revisited. Photosynth Res 75:1):1–1)10.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022421515027 Google Scholar
  63. Sari M, Chung Y, Agatha F, Kim HK (2019) Evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of phenolic lipids produced by the transesterification of 4-hydroxyphenylacetic acid and triglycerides. Appl Biol Chem 62(1):5Google Scholar
  64. Sasaki M, Kabyemela B, Malaluan R, Hirose S, Takeda N, Adschiri T, Arai K (1998) Cellulose hydrolysis in subcritical and supercritical water. J Supercrit Fluids 13(1):261–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-8446(98)00060-6 Google Scholar
  65. Schiel-Bengelsdorf B, Dürre P (2012) Pathway engineering and synthetic biology using acetogens. FEBS Lett 586(15):2191–2198Google Scholar
  66. Smachetti MES, Cenci MP, Salerno GL, Curatti L (2019) Ethanol and protein production from minimally processed biomass of a genetically-modified cyanobacterium over-accumulating sucrose. Bioresour Technol Rep 5:230–237Google Scholar
  67. Tamoi M, Miyazaki T, Fukamizo T, Shigeoka S (2005) The Calvin cycle in cyanobacteria is regulated by CP12 via the NAD(H)/NADP(H) ratio under light/dark conditions. Plant J 42(4):504–513Google Scholar
  68. Tanner RS, Miller LM, Yang D (1993) Clostridium ljungdahlii sp. nov., an acetogenic species in clostridial rRNA homology group I. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 43(2):232–236Google Scholar
  69. Thang VH, Kanda K, Kobayashi G (2010) Production of acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) in direct fermentation of cassava by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 161(1–8):157–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-009-8770-1 Google Scholar
  70. Ukpong MN, Atiyeh HK, De Lorme MJ, Liu K, Zhu X, Tanner RS, Wilkins MR, Stevenson BS (2012) Physiological response of Clostridium carboxidivorans during conversion of synthesis gas to solvents in a gas-fed bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 109(11):2720–2728Google Scholar
  71. Woo JE, Lee SY, Jang Y-S (2018) Effects of nutritional enrichment on acid production from degenerated (non-solventogenic) Clostridium acetobutylicum strain M5. Appl Biol Chem 61(4):469–472Google Scholar
  72. Zhang T, Zhao B, Chen Q, Peng X, Yang D, Qiu F (2019) Layered double hydroxide functionalized biomass carbon fiber for highly efficient and recyclable fluoride adsorption. Appl Biol Chem 62(1):12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural Chemistry and Food Science Technology, Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus Program), Institute of Agriculture & Life Science (IALS)Gyeongsang National UniversityJinjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations