Combinatory biotechnological intervention for gut microbiota
- 238 Downloads
Individual’s colonization of microbes in the gut is by birth, and there is a complex interaction between the gut microbiome and human. This interaction happens at various levels like genes, transcripts, proteins, and metabolites of different microbes present in the gut. The complete understanding of gut microflora can be studied using systems biology. Further, the contemporaneous information revealed by systems biology can be used for metabolic engineering of gut microbes. The engineered microbes having more pronounced activity helps to rejuvenate the gut microflora that plays a significant role in the management of various life-threatening diseases due to microbial imbalance. This review highlights various systems biology and metabolic engineering approaches. Moreover, this review can also emphasize on the different computational simulation models which can be further used in the efficient engineering of gut microbes. The genetically engineered models can help one to predict the significant pathways present in microbes that can be modified towards diseases treatments.
KeywordsGut microbiome Systems biology GEMs Metabolic modeling
The authors acknowledge the Maharshi Dayanand University, Rohtak, India, for providing infrastructure facility. PS acknowledges the Department of Microbiology, Barkatullah University, Bhopal, India, for their infrastructural support for D.Sc. Work.
PS acknowledges the grant from DBT, Govt. of India (Grant No. BT/PR27437/BCE/8/1433/2018) and the infrastructural support from the Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi, Govt. of India, FIST grant (Grant No. 1196 SR/FST/LS-I/ 2017/4).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This manuscript does not contain any studies with human or animal participants performed by any of the authors.
- Bissig K-D, Han W, Barzi M, Kovalchuk N, Ding L, Fan X, Pankowicz F, Zhang Q-Y, Ding X (2018) CYP-humanized and human liver chimeric mouse models for studying xenobiotic metabolism and toxicity. Drug Metab Dispos 46(11):1734–1744Google Scholar
- Blakeley-Ruiz JA, Erickson AR, Cantarel BL, Xiong W, Adams R, Jansson JK, Fraser CM, Hettich RL (2019) Metaproteomics reveals persistent and phylum-redundant metabolic functional stability in adult human gut microbiomes of Crohn’s remission patients despite temporal variations in microbial taxa, genomes, and proteomes. Microbiome 7:18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dovrolis N, Kolios G, Spyrou GM, Maroulakou I (2017) Computational profiling of the gut–brain axis: microflora dysbiosis insights to neurological disorders. Brief Bioinform 1–17Google Scholar
- Graham EB, Knelman JE, Schindlbacher A, Siciliano S, Breulmann M, Yannarell A, Beman JM, Abell G, Philippot L, Prosser J (2016) Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front Microbiol 7:214Google Scholar
- Heirendt L, Arreckx S, Pfau T, Mendoza SN, Richelle A, Heinken A, Haraldsdottir HS, Keating SM, Vlasov V, Wachowiak J (2017) Creation and analysis of biochemical constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v3. 0. arXiv Prepr arXiv171004038Google Scholar
- Huang Z, Liu Q, Peng Y, Dai J, Xie Y, Chen W, Su H, Yao X (2018) Circadian rhythm dysfunction accelerates disease progression in a mouse model with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol 9:218Google Scholar
- Jing Y, Li A, Liu Z, Yang P, Wei J, Chen X, Zhao T, Bai Y, Zha L, Zhang C (2018) Absorption of Codonopsis pilosula Saponins by Coexisting Polysaccharides Alleviates Gut Microbial Dysbiosis with Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Colitis in Model Mice. Biomed Res Int 2018:1–18Google Scholar
- Kolmeder CA, De Been M, Nikkilä J, Ritamo I, Mättö J, Valmu L, Salojärvi J, Palva A, Salonen A, de Vos WM (2012) Comparative metaproteomics and diversity analysis of human intestinal microbiota testifies for its temporal stability and expression of core functions. PLoS One 7:e29913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kolmeder CA, Salojärvi J, Ritari J, De Been M, Raes J, Falony G, Vieira-Silva S, Kekkonen RA, Corthals GL, Palva A (2016) Faecal metaproteomic analysis reveals a personalized and stable functional microbiome and limited effects of a probiotic intervention in adults. PLoS One 11:e0153294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lepczyński A, Herosimczyk A, Ożgo M, Marynowska M, Pawlikowska M, Barszcz M, Taciak M, Skomiał J (2017) Dietary chicory root and chicory inulin trigger changes in energetic metabolism, stress prevention and cytoskeletal proteins in the liver of growing pigs–a proteomic study. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 101:e225–e236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mann PE, Huynh K, Widmer G (2018) Maternal high fat diet and its consequence on the gut microbiome: A rat model. Gut Microbes 9:143–154Google Scholar
- Masetti G, Moshkelgosha S, Köhling H-L, Covelli D, Banga JP, Berchner-Pfannschmidt U, Horstmann M, Diaz-Cano S, Goertz G-E, Plummer S (2018) Gut microbiota in experimental murine model of Graves’ orbitopathy established in different environments may modulate clinical presentation of disease. Microbiome 6:97Google Scholar
- Murfitt SA, Zaccone P, Wang X, Acharjee A, Sawyer Y, Koulman A, Roberts LD, Cooke A, Griffin JL (2018) Metabolomics and Lipidomics Study of Mouse Models of Type 1 Diabetes Highlights Divergent Metabolism in Purine and Tryptophan Metabolism Prior to Disease Onset. J Proteome Res 17:946–960dGoogle Scholar
- Noecker C, Eng A, Srinivasan S, Theriot CM, Young VB, Jansson JK, Fredricks DN, Borenstein E (2016) Metabolic model-based integration of microbiome taxonomic and metabolomic profiles elucidates mechanistic links between ecological and metabolic variation. MSystems 1:e00013–e00015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pandey V, Gardiol DH, Pepe AC, Hatzimanikatis V (2019) TEX-FBA: a constraint-based method for integrating gene expression, thermodynamics, and metabolomics data into genome-scale metabolic models. bioRxiv 536235Google Scholar
- Raftis EJ, Delday MI, Cowie P, McCluskey SM, Singh MD, Ettorre A, Mulder IE (2018) Bifidobacterium breve MRx0004 protects against airway inflammation in a severe asthma model by suppressing both neutrophil and eosinophil lung infiltration. Sci Rep 8:12024Google Scholar
- Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A, Scott K, Swann J, Thiele I, Tuohy K (2017) Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur J Nutr 57(1):1–24Google Scholar
- Wang H, Marcišauskas S, Sánchez BJ, Domenzain I, Hermansson D, Agren R, Nielsen J, Kerkhoven EJ (2018) RAVEN 2.0: a versatile platform for metabolic network reconstruction and a case study on Streptomyces coelicolor. bioRxiv 321067Google Scholar
- Yadav R, Singh PK, Shukla P (2016) Production of fructooligosaccharides as ingredients of probiotic applications. Microb Biotechnol. Taylor and francis, CRC Press, pp 325–338Google Scholar
- Yadav R, Singh PK, Shukla P (2018b) Metabolic engineering for probiotics and their genome-wide expression profiling. Curr Protein Pept Sci 19(1):68–74Google Scholar
- Yu-Ling T, Lin T-L, Chih-Jung C, Wu T-R, Wei-Fan L, Chia-Chen L, Lai H-C (2019) Probiotics, prebiotics and amelioration of diseases. J Biomed Sci 26(1):3Google Scholar