Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 7, pp 3061–3071 | Cite as

Development of a biosensing platform based on a laccase-hydrophobin chimera

  • Ilaria Sorrentino
  • Paola Giardina
  • Alessandra PiscitelliEmail author
Biotechnologically relevant enzymes and proteins

Abstract

A simple and stable immobilization of a laccase from Pleurotus ostreatus was obtained through genetic fusion with a self-assembling and adhesive class I hydrophobin. The chimera protein was expressed in Pichia pastoris and secreted into the culture medium. The crude culture supernatant was directly used for coatings of polystyrene multi-well plates without additional treatments, a procedure that resulted in a less time-consuming and chemicals reduction. Furthermore, the gene fusion yielded a positive effect with respect to the wild-type recombinant enzyme in terms of both immobilization and stability. The multi-well plate with the immobilized chimera was used to develop an optical biosensor to monitor two phenolic compounds: L-DOPA ((S)-2-amino-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl) propanoic acid) and caffeic acid (3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-propenoic acid); the estimation of which is a matter of interest in the pharmaceutics and food field. The method was based on the use of the analytes as competing inhibitors of the laccase-mediated ABTS oxidation. The main advantages of the developed biosensor are the ease of preparation, the use of small sample volumes, and the simultaneous analysis of multiple samples on a single platform.

Keywords

Immobilization Chimera proteins L-DOPA Caffeic acid Self-assembly 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Manuela Rossi of the Department of Earth Sciences, Environment and Resources, Università degli studi di Napoli “Federico II”, for her assistance in acquisition of stereo microscope images.

Funding

This work was funded by grants from the University Federico II, (000023_ALTRI_DR_409_2017_Ricerca Ateneo_GIARDINA) “Immobilization of ENzymes on hydrophobin-functionalized NAnomaterials” (IENA). This project is funded by Ministry of Education, Universities and Research and co-funded by European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the framework of ERA-NET Cofund MarTERA (Maritime and Marine Technologies for a new Era), “FLAshMoB, Functional Amyloid chimera for Marine Biosensing” (ID: 172).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. Moreover, all procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

253_2019_9678_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (597 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 596 kb)

References

  1. Askolin S, Linder M, Scholtmeijer K, Tenkanen M, Penttilä M, de Vocht ML, Wösten HAB (2006) Interaction and comparison of a class I hydrophobin from Schizophyllum commune and class II hydrophobins Trichoderma reesei. Biomacromolecules 7:1295–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050676s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Stefano L, Rea I, Armenante A, Giardina P, Giocondo M, Rendina I (2007) Self-assembled biofilm of hydrophobins protects the silicon surface in the KOH wet etch process. Langmuir 23:7920–7922.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la701189b CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De Stefano L, Rea I, De Tommasi E, Rendina I, Rotiroti L, Giocondo M, Longobardi S, Armenante A, Giardina P (2009) Bioactive modification of silicon surface using self-assembled hydrophobins from Pleurotus ostreatus. Eur Phys J E 30:181–185.  https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2009-10481-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Vocht ML, Reviakine I, Ulrich W-P, Bergsma-Schutter W, Wösten HAB, Vogel H, Brisson A, Wessels JGH, Robillard GT (2002) Self-assembly of the hydrophobin SC3 proceeds via two structural intermediates. Protein Sci 11:1199–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1110/ps.4540102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ElKaoutit M, Naranjo-Rodriguez I, Temsamani KR, Hernández-Artiga MP, Bellido-Milla D, de CJLHH (2008) A comparison of three amperometric phenoloxidase-sonogel-carbon based biosensors for determination of polyphenols in beers. Food Chem 110:1019–1024.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eremia SAV, Vasilescu I, Radoi A, Litescu SC, Radu GL (2013) Disposable biosensor based on platinum nanoparticles-reduced graphene oxide-laccase biocomposite for the determination of total polyphenolic content. Talanta 110:164–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.02.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fokina O, Fenchel A, Winandy L, Fischer R (2016) Immobilization of LccC laccase from Aspergillus nidulans on hard surfaces via fungal hydrophobins. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:6395–6402.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01413-16 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garzillo AM, Colao MC, Buonocore V, Oliva R, Falcigno L, Saviano M, Santoro AM, Zappala R, Bonomo RP, Bianco C, Giardina P, Palmieri G, Sannia G (2001) Structural and kinetic characterization of native laccases from Pleurotus ostreatus, Rigidoporus lignosus, and Trametes trogii. J Protein Chem 20:191–201.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010954812955 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Giardina P, Palmieri G, Scaloni A, Fontanella B, Faraco V, Cennamo G, Sannia G (1999) Protein and gene structure of a blue laccase from Pleurotus ostreatus. Biochem J 341(Pt 3):655–663.  https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ3410655 Google Scholar
  10. Giardina P, Faraco V, Pezzella C, Piscitelli A, Vanhulle S, Sannia G (2010) Laccases: a never-ending story. Cell Mol Life Sci 67:369–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-009-0169-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gravagnuolo AM, Morales-Narváez E, Longobardi S, da Silva ET, Giardina P, Merkoçi A (2015) In situ production of biofunctionalized few-layer defect-free microsheets of graphene. Adv Funct Mater 25:2771–2779.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201500016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gravagnuolo AM, Longobardi S, Luchini A, Appavou MS, De Stefano L, Notomista E, Paduano L, Giardina P (2016) Class I hydrophobin Vmh2 adopts atypical mechanisms to self-assemble into functional amyloid fibrils. Biomacromolecules 17:954–964.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01632 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kwan AHY, Winefield RD, Sunde M, Matthews JM, Haverkamp RG, Templeton MD, Mackay JP (2006) Structural basis for rodlet assembly in fungal hydrophobins. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:3621–3626.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505704103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lettera V, Pezzella C, Cicatiello P, Piscitelli A, Giacobelli VG, Galano E, Amoresano A, Sannia G (2015) Efficient immobilization of a fungal laccase and its exploitation in fruit juice clarification. Food Chem 196:1272–1278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.10.074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Linder MB (2009) Hydrophobins: proteins that self assemble at interfaces. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci 14:356–363.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2009.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Longobardi S, Gravagnuolo AM, Funari R, Della Ventura B, Pane F, Galano E, Amoresano A, Marino G, Giardina P (2015) A simple MALDI plate functionalization by Vmh2 hydrophobin for serial multi-enzymatic protein digestions. Anal Bioanal Chem 407:487–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-014-8309-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Montereali MR, Seta LD, Vastarella W, Pilloton R (2010) A disposable laccase-tyrosinase based biosensor for amperometric detection of phenolic compounds in must and wine. J Mol Catal B Enzym 64:189–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.07.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Odaci D, Timur S, Pazarlioglu N, Montereali MR, Vastarella W, Pilloton R, Telefoncu A (2007) Determination of phenolic acids using Trametes versicolor laccase. Talanta 71:312–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2006.04.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pennacchio A, Cicatiello P, Notomista E, Giardina P (2018) New clues into the self-assembly of Vmh2, a basidiomycota class I hydrophobin. 399:895–901.  https://doi.org/10.1515/hsz-2018-0124
  20. Pezzella C, Giacobelli VG, Lettera V, Olivieri G, Cicatiello P, Sannia G, Piscitelli A (2017) A step forward in laccase exploitation: recombinant production and evaluation of techno-economic feasibility of the process. J Biotechnol 259:175–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.07.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piscitelli A, Cicatiello P, Gravagnuolo AM, Sorrentino I, Pezzella C, Giardina P (2017a) Applications of functional amyloids from fungi: surface modification by class I hydrophobins. Biomolecules 7:45.  https://doi.org/10.3390/biom7030045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Piscitelli A, Pennacchio A, Cicatiello P, Politi J, De Stefano L, Giardina P (2017b) Rapid and ultrasensitive detection of active thrombin based on the Vmh2 hydrophobin fused to a green fluorescent protein. Biosens Bioelectron 87:816–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piscitelli A, Pennacchio A, Longobardi S, Velotta R, Giardina P (2017c) Vmh2 hydrophobin as a tool for the development of “self-immobilizing” enzymes for biosensing. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:46–52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Portaccio M, Gravagnuolo AM, Longobardi S, Giardina P, Rea I, De Stefano L, Cammarota M, Lepore M (2015) ATR FT-IR spectroscopy on Vmh2 hydrophobin self-assembled layers for teflon membrane bio-functionalization. Appl Surf Sci 351:673–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.05.182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Qin M, Wang L-K, Feng X-Z, Yang Y-L, Wang R, Wang C, Yu L, Shao B, Qiao M-Q (2007) Bioactive surface modification of mica and poly(dimethylsiloxane) with hydrophobins for protein immobilization. Langmuir 23:4465–4471.  https://doi.org/10.1021/LA062744H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rodríguez-Delgado MM, Alemán-Nava GS, Rodríguez-Delgado JM, Dieck-Assad G, Martínez-Chapa SO, Barceló D, Parra R (2015) Laccase-based biosensors for detection of phenolic compounds. TrAC Trends Anal Chem 74:21–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2015.05.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saini AS, Kumar J, Melo JS (2014) Microplate based optical biosensor for L-DOPA using tyrosinase from Amorphophallus campanulatus. Anal Chim Acta 849:50–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Takatsuji Y, Yamasaki R, Iwanaga A, Lienemann M, Linder MB, Haruyama T (2013) Solid-support immobilization of a “swing” fusion protein for enhanced glucose oxidase catalytic activity. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 112:186–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFB.2013.07.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tembe S, Karve M, Inamdar S, Haram S, Melo J, D’Souza SF (2006) Development of electrochemical biosensor based on tyrosinase immobilized in composite biopolymeric film. Anal Biochem 349:72–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2005.11.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wang Z, Lienemann M, Qiau M, Linder MB (2010) Mechanisms of protein adhesion on surface films of hydrophobin. Langmuir 26:8491–8496.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la101240e CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zampieri F, Wösten HAB, Scholtmeijer K (2010) Creating surface properties using a palette of hydrophobins. Materials (Basel) 3:4607–4625.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3094607 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao Z-X, Qiao M-Q, Yin F, Shao B, Wu B-Y, Wang Y-Y, Wang X-S, Qin X, Li S, Yu L, Chen Q (2007) Amperometric glucose biosensor based on self-assembly hydrophobin with high efficiency of enzyme utilization. Biosens Bioelectron 22:3021–3027.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOS.2007.01.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations