Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 7, pp 2973–2984 | Cite as

Bioengineering of microbial transglutaminase for biomedical applications

  • Soo Khim ChanEmail author
  • Theam Soon Lim
Mini-Review
  • 253 Downloads

Abstract

Microbial transglutaminase (mTGase) is commonly known in the food industry as meat glue due to its incredible ability to “glue” meat proteins together. Aside from being widely exploited in the meat processing industries, mTGase is also widely applied in other food and textile industries by catalysing the formation of isopeptide bonds between peptides or protein substrates. The advancement of technology has opened up new avenues for mTGase in the field of biomedical engineering. Efforts have been made to study the structural properties of mTGase in order to gain an in-depth understanding of the structure-function relationship. This review highlights the developments in mTGase engineering together with its role in biomedical applications including biomaterial fabrication for tissue engineering and biotherapeutics.

Keywords

Microbial transglutaminase Gelatin Chitosan Collagen Biomaterials Antibody-drug conjugate 

Notes

Funding

This study was funded by Malaysian Ministry of Education under the Higher Institutions Centre of Excellence (HICoE) Grant Scheme (311/CIPPM/4401005).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Aeschlimann D (1994) Transglutaminases: protein cross-linking enzymes in tissues and body fluids. Thromb Haemost 71:402–415Google Scholar
  2. Anami Y, Xiong W, Gui X, Deng M, Zhang CC, Zhang N, An Z, Tsuchikama K (2017) Enzymatic conjugation using branched linkers for constructing homogeneous antibody–drug conjugates with high potency. Org Biomol Chem 15(26):5635–5642Google Scholar
  3. Ando H, Adachi M, Umeda K, Matsuura A, Nonaka M, Uchio R, Tanaka H, Motoki M (1989) Purification and characteristics of a novel transglutaminase derived from microorganisms. Agric Biol Chem 53(10):2613–2617Google Scholar
  4. Bhokisham N, Pakhchanian H, Quan D, Tschirhart T, Tsao C-Y, Payne GF, Bentley WE (2016) Modular construction of multi-subunit protein complexes using engineered tags and microbial transglutaminase. Metab Eng 38:1–9Google Scholar
  5. Buettner K, Hertel TC, Pietzsch M (2012) Increased thermostability of microbial transglutaminase by combination of several hot spots evolved by random and saturation mutagenesis. Amino Acids 42(2–3):987–996Google Scholar
  6. Caporale A, Selis F, Sandomenico A, Jotti GS, Tonon G, Ruvo M (2015) The LQSP tetrapeptide is a new highly efficient substrate of microbial transglutaminase for the site-specific derivatization of peptides and proteins. Biotechnol J 10(1):154–161Google Scholar
  7. Chen T, Janjua R, McDermott MK, Bernstein SL, Steidl SM, Payne GF (2006) Gelatin-based biomimetic tissue adhesive. Potential for retinal reattachment. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77(2):416–422Google Scholar
  8. Collighan R, Clara S, Li X, Parry J, Griffin M (2004) Transglutaminases as tanning agents for the leather industry. J Am Leather Chem Assoc 99(7):293–302Google Scholar
  9. Coussons P, Price N, Kelly S, Smith B, Sawyer L (1992) Factors that govern the specificity of transglutaminase-catalysed modification of proteins and peptides. Biochem J 282(Pt 3):929–930Google Scholar
  10. Damodaran G, Collighan R, Griffin M, Navsaria H, Pandit A (2009a) Tailored laminin-332 α3 sequence is tethered through an enzymatic linker to a collagen scaffold to promote cellular adhesion. Acta Biomater 5(7):2441–2450Google Scholar
  11. Damodaran G, Collighan R, Griffin M, Pandit A (2009b) Tethering a laminin peptide to a crosslinked collagen scaffold for biofunctionality. J Biomed Mater Res A 89(4):1001–1010Google Scholar
  12. Dennler P, Chiotellis A, Fischer E, Brégeon D, Belmant C, Gauthier L, Lhospice F, Romagne F, Schibli R (2014) Transglutaminase-based chemo-enzymatic conjugation approach yields homogeneous antibody–drug conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 25(3):569–578Google Scholar
  13. Dennler P, Bailey LK, Spycher PR, Schibli R, Fischer E (2015) Microbial transglutaminase and c-myc-tag: a strong couple for the functionalization of antibody-like protein scaffolds from discovery platforms. ChemBioChem 16(5):861–867Google Scholar
  14. Deweid L, Neureiter L, Englert S, Schneider H, Deweid J, Yanakieva D, Sturm J, Bitsch S, Christmann A, Avrutina O (2018) Directed evolution of a bond-forming enzyme: ultrahigh-throughput screening of microbial transglutaminase using yeast surface display. Chem Eur J 24(57):15195–15200Google Scholar
  15. Eder J, Fersht AR (1995) Pro-sequence-assisted protein folding. Mol Microbiol 16(4):609–614Google Scholar
  16. Fan L, Wu H, Zhou X, Peng M, Tong J, Xie W, Liu S (2014) Transglutaminase-catalyzed grafting collagen on chitosan and its characterization. Carbohydr Polym 105:253–259Google Scholar
  17. Farias SE, Strop P, Delaria K, Galindo Casas M, Dorywalska M, Shelton DL, Pons J, Rajpal A (2014) Mass spectrometric characterization of transglutaminase based site-specific antibody–drug conjugates. Bioconjug Chem 25(2):240–250Google Scholar
  18. Fernandez JG, Seetharam S, Ding C, Feliz J, Doherty E, Ingber DE (2017) Direct bonding of chitosan biomaterials to tissues using transglutaminase for surgical repair or device implantation. Tissue Eng A 23(3–4):135–142Google Scholar
  19. Fernandez-Gacio A, Uguen M, Fastrez J (2003) Phage display as a tool for the directed evolution of enzymes. Trends Biotechnol 21(9):408–414Google Scholar
  20. Fiebig D, Schmelz S, Zindel S, Ehret V, Beck J, Ebenig A, Ehret M, Fröls S, Pfeifer F, Kolmar H (2016) Structure of the Dispase autolysis inducing protein from Streptomyces mobaraensis and glutamine cross-linking sites for transglutaminase. J Biol Chem 291:20417–20426Google Scholar
  21. Folk J, Chung SI (1985) Transglutaminases. Methods Enzymol 113:358–375Google Scholar
  22. Garcia Y, Collighan R, Griffin M, Pandit A (2007) Assessment of cell viability in a three-dimensional enzymatically cross-linked collagen scaffold. J Mater Sci Mater Med 18(10):1991–2001Google Scholar
  23. Greenberg CS, Birckbichler PJ, Rice RH (1991) Transglutaminases: multifunctional cross-linking enzymes that stabilize tissues. FASEB J 5(15):3071–3077Google Scholar
  24. Grootjans JJ, Groenen PJ, de Jong WW (1995) Substrate requirements for transglutaminases. Influence of the amino acid residue preceding the amine donor lysine in a native protein. J Biol Chem 270(39):22855–22858Google Scholar
  25. Gundersen MT, Keillor JW, Pelletier JN (2014) Microbial transglutaminase displays broad acyl-acceptor substrate specificity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(1):219–230Google Scholar
  26. Heck T, Faccio G, Richter M, Thöny-Meyer L (2013) Enzyme-catalyzed protein crosslinking. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 97(2):461–475Google Scholar
  27. Ismail NF, Lim TS (2016) Site-specific scFv labelling with invertase via Sortase a mechanism as a platform for antibody-antigen detection using the personal glucose meter. Sci Rep 6:19338Google Scholar
  28. Jeger S, Zimmermann K, Blanc A, Grünberg J, Honer M, Hunziker P, Struthers H, Schibli R (2010) Site-specific and stoichiometric modification of antibodies by bacterial transglutaminase. Angew Chem 49(51):9995–9997Google Scholar
  29. Jiang Y, Shang Y-P, Li H, Zhang C, Pan J, Bai Y-P, Li C-X, Xu J-H (2017) Enhancing transglutaminase production of Streptomyces mobaraensis by iterative mutagenesis breeding with atmospheric and room-temperature plasma (ARTP). Bioresour Bioprocess 4(1):37Google Scholar
  30. Juettner NE, Schmelz S, Bogen JP, Happel D, Fessner WD, Pfeifer F, Fuchsbauer HL, Scrima A (2018) Illuminating structure and acyl donor sites of a physiological transglutaminase substrate from Streptomyces mobaraensis. Protein Sci 27(5):910–922Google Scholar
  31. Kashiwagi T, Yokoyama K-I, Ishikawa K, Ono K, Ejima D, Matsui H, Suzuki E-I (2002) Crystal structure of microbial transglutaminase from Streptoverticillium mobaraense. J Biol Chem 277(46):44252–44260Google Scholar
  32. Kieliszek M, Misiewicz A (2014) Microbial transglutaminase and its application in the food industry. A review. Folia Microbiol 59(3):241–250Google Scholar
  33. Kim J-M, Park WH, Min B-M (2005) The PPFLMLLKGSTR motif in globular domain 3 of the human laminin-5 α3 chain is crucial for integrin α3β1 binding and cell adhesion. Exp Cell Res 304(1):317–327Google Scholar
  34. Labrou NE (2010) Random mutagenesis methods for in vitro directed enzyme evolution. Curr Protein Pept Sci 11(1):91–100Google Scholar
  35. Liu Y, Kopelman D, Wu LQ, Hijji K, Attar I, Preiss-Bloom O, Payne GF (2009) Biomimetic sealant based on gelatin and microbial transglutaminase: an initial in vivo investigation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 91(1):5–16Google Scholar
  36. Long H, Ma K, Xiao Z, Ren X, Yang G (2017) Preparation and characteristics of gelatin sponges crosslinked by microbial transglutaminase. PeerJ 5:e3665Google Scholar
  37. Lv F, Cong X, Tang W, Han Y, Tang Y, Liu Y, Su L, Liu M, Jin M, Yi Z (2017) Novel hemostatic agents based on gelatin-microbial transglutaminase mix. Sci China Life Sci 60(4):397–403Google Scholar
  38. Marx CK, Hertel TC, Pietzsch M (2008a) Purification and activation of a recombinant histidine-tagged pro-transglutaminase after soluble expression in Escherichia coli and partial characterization of the active enzyme. Enzym Microb Technol 42(7):568–575Google Scholar
  39. Marx CK, Hertel TC, Pietzsch M (2008b) Random mutagenesis of a recombinant microbial transglutaminase for the generation of thermostable and heat-sensitive variants. J Biotechnol 136(3):156–162Google Scholar
  40. McDermott MK, Chen T, Williams CM, Markley KM, Payne GF (2004) Mechanical properties of biomimetic tissue adhesive based on the microbial transglutaminase-catalyzed crosslinking of gelatin. Biomacromolecules 5(4):1270–1279Google Scholar
  41. Mo X, Iwata H, Matsuda S, Ikada Y (2000) Soft tissue adhesive composed of modified gelatin and polysaccharides. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 11(4):341–351Google Scholar
  42. Motoki M, Seguro K (1998) Transglutaminase and its use for food processing. Trends Food Sci Technol 9(5):204–210Google Scholar
  43. Muzzarelli RA (2009) Chitins and chitosans for the repair of wounded skin, nerve, cartilage and bone. Carbohydr Polym 76(2):167–182Google Scholar
  44. Mycek M, Clarke D, Neidle A, Waelsch H (1959) Amine incorporation into insulin as catalyzed by transglutaminase. Arch Biochem Biophys 84(2):528–540Google Scholar
  45. O Halloran DM, Collighan RJ, Griffin M, Pandit AS (2006) Characterization of a microbial transglutaminase cross-linked type II collagen scaffold. Tissue Eng 12(6):1467–1474Google Scholar
  46. O'brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14(3):88–95Google Scholar
  47. Ohtsuka T, Ota M, Nio N, Motoki M (2000a) Comparison of substrate specificities of transglutaminases using synthetic peptides as acyl donors. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 64(12):2608–2613Google Scholar
  48. Ohtsuka T, Sawa A, Kawabata R, Nio N, Motoki M (2000b) Substrate specificities of microbial transglutaminase for primary amines. J Agric Food Chem 48(12):6230–6233Google Scholar
  49. Ohtsuka T, Umezawa Y, Nio N, Kubota K (2001) Comparison of deamidation activity of transglutaminases. J Food Sci 66(1):25–29Google Scholar
  50. Pasternack R, Dorsch S, Otterbach JT, Robenek IR, Wolf S, Fuchsbauer HL (1998) Bacterial pro-transglutaminase from Streptoverticillium mobaraense. FEBS J 257(3):570–576Google Scholar
  51. Piper JL, Gray GM, Khosla C (2002) High selectivity of human tissue transglutaminase for immunoactive gliadin peptides: implications for celiac sprue. Biochemistry 41(1):386–393Google Scholar
  52. Pozzuolo S, Breme U, Salis B, Taylor G, Tonon G, Orsini G (2008) Efficient bacterial expression of fusion proteins and their selective processing by a recombinant Kex-1 protease. Protein Expr Purif 59(2):334–341Google Scholar
  53. Rachel NM, Pelletier JN (2013) Biotechnological applications of transglutaminases. Biomolecules 3(4):870–888Google Scholar
  54. Rachel NM, Quaglia D, Lévesque É, Charette AB, Pelletier JN (2017) Engineered, highly reactive substrates of microbial transglutaminase enable protein labeling within various secondary structure elements. Protein Sci 26(11):2268–2279Google Scholar
  55. Rickert M, Strop P, Lui V, Melton-Witt J, Farias SE, Foletti D, Shelton D, Pons J, Rajpal A (2016) Production of soluble and active microbial transglutaminase in Escherichia coli for site-specific antibody drug conjugation. Protein Sci 25(2):442–455Google Scholar
  56. Rose JB, Pacelli S, Haj AJE, Dua HS, Hopkinson A, White LJ, Rose FR (2014) Gelatin-based materials in ocular tissue engineering. Materials 7(4):3106–3135Google Scholar
  57. Salis B, Spinetti G, Scaramuzza S, Bossi M, Jotti GS, Tonon G, Crobu D, Schrepfer R (2015) High-level expression of a recombinant active microbial transglutaminase in Escherichia coli. BMC Biotechnol 15(1):84Google Scholar
  58. Sang LY, Zhou XH, Yun F, Zhang GL (2010) Enzymatic synthesis of chitosan–gelatin antimicrobial copolymer and its characterisation. J Sci Food Agric 90(1):58–64Google Scholar
  59. Shimba N, Yokoyama K-I, Suzuki E-I (2002) NMR-based screening method for transglutaminases: rapid analysis of their substrate specificities and reaction rates. J Agric Food Chem 50(6):1330–1334Google Scholar
  60. Spolaore B, Raboni S, Ramos Molina A, Satwekar A, Damiano N, Fontana A (2012) Local unfolding is required for the site-specific protein modification by transglutaminase. Biochemistry 51(43):8679–8689Google Scholar
  61. Spolaore B, Forzato G, Fontana A (2018) Site-specific derivatization of human interferon β-1a at lysine residues using microbial transglutaminase. Amino Acids:1–10Google Scholar
  62. Strop P (2014) Versatility of microbial transglutaminase. Bioconjug Chem 25(5):855–862Google Scholar
  63. Strop P, Liu S-H, Dorywalska M, Delaria K, Dushin RG, Tran T-T, Ho W-H, Farias S, Casas MG, Abdiche Y (2013) Location matters: site of conjugation modulates stability and pharmacokinetics of antibody drug conjugates. Chem Biol 20(2):161–167Google Scholar
  64. Strop P, Dorywalska MG, Rajpal A, Shelton D, Liu S-H, Pons J, Dushin R (2017) Engineered polypeptide conjugates and methods for making thereof using transglutaminase. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  65. Sugimura Y, Yokoyama K, Nio N, Maki M, Hitomi K (2008) Identification of preferred substrate sequences of microbial transglutaminase from Streptomyces mobaraensis using a phage-displayed peptide library. Arch Biochem Biophys 477(2):379–383Google Scholar
  66. Tagami U, Shimba N, Nakamura M, K-i Y, E-i S, Hirokawa T (2009) Substrate specificity of microbial transglutaminase as revealed by three-dimensional docking simulation and mutagenesis. Protein Eng Des Sel 22:747–752Google Scholar
  67. Wakabayashi R, Yahiro K, Hayashi K, Goto M, Kamiya N (2016) Protein-grafted polymers prepared through a site-specific conjugation by microbial transglutaminase for an immunosorbent assay. Biomacromolecules 18(2):422–430Google Scholar
  68. Xu W, Xiao Y, Luo P, Fan L (2018) Preparation and characterization of C-phycocyanin peptide grafted N-succinyl chitosan by enzyme method. Int J Biol Macromol 113:841–848Google Scholar
  69. Yamamoto S, Hirata A, Ishikawa S, Ohta K, Nakamura K-I, Okinami S (2013) Feasibility of using gelatin-microbial transglutaminase complex to repair experimental retinal detachment in rabbit eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251(4):1109–1114Google Scholar
  70. Yang M-T, Chang C-H, Wang JM, Wu TK, Wang Y-K, Chang C-Y, Li TT (2011) Crystal structure and inhibition studies of transglutaminase from Streptomyces mobaraense. J Biol Chem 286(9):7301–7307Google Scholar
  71. Yang G, Xiao Z, Ren X, Long H, Qian H, Ma K, Guo Y (2016) Enzymatically crosslinked gelatin hydrogel promotes the proliferation of adipose tissue-derived stromal cells. PeerJ 4:e2497Google Scholar
  72. Yokoyama K, Utsumi H, Nakamura T, Ogaya D, Shimba N, Suzuki E, Taguchi S (2010) Screening for improved activity of a transglutaminase from Streptomyces mobaraensis created by a novel rational mutagenesis and random mutagenesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 87(6):2087–2096Google Scholar
  73. Yu T, Guan Y, Xie X, Huang Y, Tang J (2015) Improved thrombin hemostat using the cross-linked gelatin by microbial transglutaminase. Int J Polym Sci:2015Google Scholar
  74. Zhang X, Zhang X-F, Li H-P, Wang L-Y, Zhang C, Xing X-H, Bao C-Y (2014) Atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) as a new powerful mutagenesis tool. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(12):5387–5396Google Scholar
  75. Zhao X, Shaw AC, Wang J, Chang C-C, Deng J, Su J (2010) A novel high-throughput screening method for microbial transglutaminases with high specificity toward Gln141 of human growth hormone. J Biomol Screen 15(2):206–212Google Scholar
  76. Zhao L, Li X, Zhao J, Ma S, Ma X, Fan D, Zhu C, Liu Y (2016) A novel smart injectable hydrogel prepared by microbial transglutaminase and human-like collagen: its characterization and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C 68:317–326Google Scholar
  77. Zolot RS, Basu S, Million RP (2013) Antibody–drug conjugates. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12(4):259–260Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Research in Molecular MedicineUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia
  2. 2.Analytical Biochemistry Research CentreUniversiti Sains MalaysiaPenangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations