Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 6, pp 2833–2843 | Cite as

Algal sorbent derived from Sargassum horneri for adsorption of cesium and strontium ions: equilibrium, kinetics, and mass transfer

  • Yuming Hu
  • Xuan Guo
  • Can Chen
  • Jianlong WangEmail author
Environmental biotechnology

Abstract

An algal sorbent derived from Sargassum horneri was prepared and used to adsorb cesium and strontium ions from aqueous solution. The phenomenological mathematical models associated to the predicted equilibrium isotherms were developed to determine the rate-limiting steps of the adsorption process. The maximum adsorption capacity of cesium ion and strontium ion was calculated to be 0.358 and 1.72 mmol g−1, respectively. The adsorption kinetics followed to the pseudo-second-order equation. It was found that adsorption of cesium or strontium ions onto the active sites of the biosorbent was the rate-limiting step. In addition, the external mass transfer and the internal mass transfer cannot be neglected for the adsorption of strontium ion based on the error analysis. The functional groups relevant to the adsorption were carboxyl and sulfate groups.

Keywords

Algal sorbent Biosorption Kinetic model Mass transfer 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC1402507) and the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT-13026). The authors would like to thank Dr. T. F. Shan (Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for kindly providing the dry seaweed materials.

Compliance with ethical standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

253_2019_9619_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (417 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 416 kb)

References

  1. Abdullah MA, Chiang L, Nadeem M (2009) Comparative evaluation of adsorption kinetics and isotherms of a natural product removal by Amberlite polymeric adsorbents. Chem Eng J 146:370–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alluri H, Ronda S, Settalluri V, Bondili J, Suryanarayana V, Venkateshwar P (2007) Biosorption: an eco-friendly alternative for heavy metal removal. Afr J Biotechnol 6:2924–2931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand M, Suresh S (2015) Marine seaweed Sargassum wightii extract as a low-cost sensitizer for ZnO photoanode based dye-sensitized solar cell. Adv Nat Sci Nanosci Nanotechnol 6:035008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey SE, Olin TJ, Bricka RM, Adrian DD (1999) A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res 33:2469–2479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanco SPDM, Scheufele FB, Módenes AN, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Marin P, Kroumov AD, Borba CE (2017) Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic phenomenological modeling of reactive dye adsorption onto polymeric adsorbent. Chem Eng J 307:466–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady JM, Tobin JM (1995) Binding of hard and soft metal ions to Rhizopus arrhizus biomass. Enzyme Microb Technol 17:791–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caldwell ADS, Bye PGT, Briggs MH (1967) Strontium, calcium and magnesium in brown algae. Nature 215:1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chale-Dzul J, Moo-Puc R, Robledo D, Freile-Pelegrín Y (2014) Hepatoprotective effect of the fucoidan from the brown seaweed Turbinaria tricostata. J Appl Phycol 27:2123–2135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen YW, Wang JL (2012) Removal of radionuclide Sr2+ ions from aqueous solution using synthesized magnetic chitosan beads. Nucl Eng Des 242:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen YW, Wang JL (2016) Removal of cesium from radioactive wastewater using magnetic chitosan beads cross-linked with glutaraldehyde. Nucl Sci Tech 27:43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-016-0033-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen JP, Yang L (2006) Study of a heavy metal biosorption onto raw and chemically modified Sargassum sp. via spectroscopic and modeling analysis. Langmuir 22:8906–8914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chi T, Zuo JE, Liu FL (2017) Performance and mechanism for cadmium and lead adsorption from water and soil by corn straw biochar. Front Environ Sci Eng 11:15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0921-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruz P, Magalhães FD, Mendes A (2006) Generalized linear driving force approximation for adsorption of multicomponent mixtures. Chem Eng Sci 61:3519–3531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dotto GL, Pinto LAA (2012) Analysis of mass transfer kinetics in the biosorption of synthetic dyes onto Spirulina platensis nanoparticles. Biochem Eng J 68:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elovich SY, Larinov OG (1962) Theory of adsorption from solutions of non electrolytes on solid (I) equation adsorption from solutions and the analysis of its simplest form, (II) verification of the equation of adsorption isotherm from solutions. Izv Akad Nauk Sssr Otdelenie Khim Nauk 2:209–216Google Scholar
  16. Figueira MM, Volesky B, Mathieu HJ (1999) Instrumental analysis study of iron species biosorption by Sargassum biomass. Environ Sci Technol 33:1840–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fourest E, Volesky B (1996) Contribution of sulfonate groups and alginate to heavy metal biosorption by the dry biomass of Sargassum fluitans. Environ Sci Technol 30:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freundlich H (1907) Über die adsorption in lösungen. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 57U:(1)385–470Google Scholar
  19. Ho YS, McKay G (1998a) A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process Saf Environ Prot 76:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ho YS, Mckay G (1998b) Sorption of dye from aqueous solution by peat. Chem Eng J 70:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ho YS, Mckay G (1999) Pseudo-second order model for sorption processes. Process Biochem 34:451–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurvich CM (1991) Bias of the corrected AIC criterion for underfitted regression and time series models. Biometrika 78:499–509Google Scholar
  23. Jia F, Wang JL (2017) Separation of cesium ions from aqueous solution by vacuum membrane distillation process. Prog Nucl Energy 98:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jia F, Li J, Wang JL, Sun YL (2017a) Removal of cesium from simulated radioactive wastewater using a novel disc tubular reverse osmosis system. Nucl Technol 197:219–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jia F, Li JF, Wang JL, Sun YL (2017b) Removal of strontium ions from simulated radioactive wastewater by vacuum membrane distillation. Ann Nucl Energy 103:363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar KV, Sivanesan S (2005) Comparison of linear and non-linear method in estimating the sorption isotherm parameters for safranin onto activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 123:288–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lagergren S (1898) Zur theorie der sogenannten adsorption gelöster stoffe. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 24(4):1–39Google Scholar
  28. Langmuir I (1918) The adsorption of gases on plane surfaces of glass, mica and platinum. J Am Chem Soc 40:1361–1403Google Scholar
  29. Leyva-Ramos R, Ocampo-Perez R, Mendoza-Barron J (2012) External mass transfer and hindered diffusion of organic compounds in the adsorption on activated carbon cloth. Chem Eng J 183:141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lin J, Wang L (2009) Comparison between linear and non-linear forms of pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order adsorption kinetic models for the removal of methylene blue by activated carbon. Front Environ Sci Eng 3:320–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin Q, Xu X, Wang LH, Chen Q, Fang J, Shen XD, Lou LP, Tian GM (2017) The speciation, leachability and bioaccessibility of Cu and Zn in animal manure-derived biochar: effect of feedstock and pyrolysis temperature. Front Environ Sci Eng 11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-017-0924-8
  32. Liu XJ, Wu JL, Wang JL (2018) Removal of Cs(I) from simulated radioactive wastewater by three forward osmosis membranes. Chem Eng J 344:353–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marin P, Borba CE, Modenes AN, Espinoza-Quinones FR, de Oliveira SP, Kroumov AD (2014) Determination of the mass transfer limiting step of dye adsorption onto commercial adsorbent by using mathematical models. Environ Technol 35:2356–2364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marks L, Salinas-Ruiz P, Reed D, Holbrook S, Culver C, Engle J, Kushner D, Caselle J, Freiwald J, Williams J, Smith J, Aguilar-Rosas L, Kaplanis N (2015) Range expansion of a non-native, invasive macroalga Sargassum horneri (Turner) C. Agardh, 1820 in the eastern Pacific. BioInvasions Records 4:243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nuhoglu Y, Malkoc E, Gürses A, Canpolat N (2002) The removal of Cu (II) from aqueous solutions by Ulothrix zonata. Bioresour Technol 85:331–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Ocampo-Perez R, Leyva-Ramos R, Mendoza-Barron J, Guerrero-Coronado RM (2011) Adsorption rate of phenol from aqueous solution onto organobentonite: surface diffusion and kinetic models. J Colloid Interface Sci 364:195–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Park Y, Lee YC, Shin WS, Choi SJ (2010) Removal of cobalt, strontium and cesium from radioactive laundry wastewater by ammonium molybdophosphate–polyacrylonitrile (AMP–PAN). Chem Eng J 162:685–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Piccin JS, Dotto GL, Vieira MLG, Pinto LAA (2011) Kinetics and mechanism of the food dye FD&C Red 40 adsorption onto chitosan. J Chem Eng Data 56:3759–3765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rahman ROA, Ibrahim HA, Hanafy M, Monem NMA (2010) Assessment of synthetic zeolite Na A–X as sorbing barrier for strontium in a radioactive disposal facility. Chem Eng J 157:100–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raize O, Argaman Y, Yannai S (2004) Mechanisms of biosorption of different heavy metals by brown marine macroalgae. Biotechnol Bioeng 87:451–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rogers H, Bowers J, Gates-Anderson D (2012) An isotope dilution-precipitation process for removing radioactive cesium from wastewater. J Hazard Mater 243:124–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Scheufele FB, Módenes AN, Borba CE, Ribeiro C, Espinoza-Quiñones FR, Bergamasco R, Pereira NC (2016) Monolayer–multilayer adsorption phenomenological model: kinetics, equilibrium and thermodynamics. Chem Eng J 284:1328–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Southichak B, Nakano K, Nomura M, Chiba N, Nishimura O (2008) Marine macroalga Sargassum horneri as biosorbent for heavy metal removal: roles of calcium in ion exchange mechanism. Water Sci Technol 58:697–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Suzaki PYR, Munaro MT, Triques CC, Kleinübing SJ, Klen MRF, de Matos Jorge LM, Bergamasco R (2017) Biosorption of binary heavy metal systems: phenomenological mathematical modeling. Chem Eng J 313:364–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tan KL, Hameed BH (2017) Insight into the adsorption kinetics models for the removal of contaminants from aqueous solutions. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 74:25–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Umpleby RJ, Baxter SC, Chen Y, Shah RN, Shimizu KD (2001) Characterization of molecularly imprinted polymers with the Langmuir−Freundlich isotherm. Anal Chem 73(19):4584–4591Google Scholar
  47. US EPA (2016) Current and emerging post-Fukushima technologies, and techniques, and practices for wide area radiological survey, remediation, and waste management. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC EPA/600/R-16/140Google Scholar
  48. Vafajoo L, Cheraghi R, Dabbagh R, McKay G (2018) Removal of cobalt (II) ions from aqueous solutions utilizing the pre-treated 2-Hypnea Valentiae algae: equilibrium, thermodynamic, and dynamic studies. Chem Eng J 331:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang JL, Chen C (2009) Biosorbents for heavy metals removal and their future. Biotechnol Adv 27:195–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang JL, Chen C (2014) Chitosan-based biosorbents: modification and application for biosorption of heavy metals and radionuclides. Bioresour Technol 160:129–141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang JL, Zhuang ST (2017) Removal of various pollutants from water and wastewater by modified chitosan adsorbents. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 47:2331–2386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang JL, Zhuang ST, Liu Y (2018a) Metal hexacyanoferrates-based adsorbents for cesium removal. Coord Chem Rev 374:430–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang X, Shan T, Pang S (2018b) Phytoremediation potential of Saccharina japonica and Sargassum horneri (Phaeophyceae): biosorption study of strontium. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 101:501–505CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang CH (1998) Statistical mechanical study on the Freundlich isotherm equation. J Colloid Interface Sci 208:379–387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Yang C, Nan C, Cai J (2017) Bioadsorption characteristic of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution by nonliving Sargassum horneri. Environ Pollut Cont 39:159–164Google Scholar
  56. Yin YN, Hu J, Wang JL (2017a) Removal of Sr2+, Co2+ and Cs+ from aqueous solution by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae with magnetic chitosan beads. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 36:989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yin YN, Wang JL, Yang XY, Li WH (2017b) Removal of strontium ions by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae in magnetic chitosan microspheres. Nucl Eng Technol 49:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, INETTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Radioactive Wastes TreatmentTsinghua UniversityBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations