The homeobox gene MaH1 governs microcycle conidiation for increased conidial yield by mediating transcription of conidiation pattern shift-related genes in Metarhizium acridum
Conidiation capacity and conidial quality are very important for the production and application of mycopesticides. Most filamentous ascomycetous fungi have two distinct patterns of conidiation. Conidiation through microcycle conidiation proceeds to more rapidly achieve a maximum of conidial yield than normal conidiation and hence is of greater merit for exploitation in mass production of fungal insect pathogens, such as Metarhizium acridum. In this study, the mechanism underlying the conidiation pattern shift in M. acridum was explored by characterization of the fungal homeobox gene MaH1. MaH1 was evidently localized to the nuclei of hyphae and transcriptionally expressed at a maximal level when conidiation began. Intriguingly, deletion of MaH1 in M. acridum resulted in a shift of normal conidiation to microcycle conidiation on one-quarter strength Sabouraud’s dextrose agar medium, and hence accelerated conidiation and increased conidial yield. In the deletion mutant, moreover, conidia became larger in size and hyphae cells were shorter in length while conidial virulence and stress tolerance were not altered. As revealed by digital gene expression profiling, MaH1 controlled the shift of conidiation patterns by mediating transcription of a set of genes related to hyphal growth, cell differentiation, conidiation, and some important signaling pathways. These findings indicate that MaH1 and its downstream genes can be exploited to increase the conidial yield for more efficient production of mycopesticides.
KeywordsMetarhizium acridum Homeobox gene Transcription factor Microcycle conidiation Conidiation pattern shift
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 31272090), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing (cstc 2018jcyjAX0554), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (106112017CDJQJ298831).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
- Bosch A, Yantorno O (1999) Microcycle conidiation in the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana Bals. (Vuill.). Process Biochem 34(6–7):707–716Google Scholar
- Charnley AK, Collins SA (2007) Entomopathogenic fungi and their role in pest control. In: Kubicek C, Druzhinina I (eds) Environmental and microbial relationships. The mycota IV, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 159–187Google Scholar
- Federici BA, Bonning BC, St Leger RJ (2008) Improvement of insect pathogens as insecticides through genetic engineering. In: Hill C, Sleator R (eds) Patho-biotechnology. Landes Bioscience, Austin, pp 15–40Google Scholar
- Gao Q, Jin K, Ying S, Zhang Y, Xiao G, Shang Y, Duan Z, Hu X, Xie X, Zhou G, Peng G, Luo Z, Huang W, Wang B, Fang W, Wang S, Zhong Y, Ma L, St Leger RJ, Zhao G, Pei Y, Feng M, Xia Y, Wang C (2011) Genome sequencing and comparative transcriptomics of the model entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and M. acridum. PLoS Genet 7(1):e1001264PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Green KA, Becker Y, Tanaka A, Takemoto D, Fitzsimons HL, Seiler S, Lalucque H, Silar P, Scott B (2017) SymB and SymC, two membrane associated proteins, are required for Epichloë festucae hyphal cell-cell fusion and maintenance of a mutualistic interaction with Lolium perenne. Mol Microbiol 103(4):657–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hajek AE, McManus ML, Delalibera I (2007) A review of introductions of pathogens and nematodes for classical biological control of insects and mites. Biol Control 41(1):1–13Google Scholar
- Hanlin R (1994) Microcycle conidiation — a review. Mycoscience 35(1):113–123Google Scholar
- Lacey LA, Frutos R, Kaya HK, Vail P (2001) Insect pathogens as biological control agents: do they have a future? Biol Control 21(3):230–248Google Scholar
- Lazo GR, Stein PA, Ludwig RA (1991) A DNA transformation-competent Arabidopsis genomic library in Agrobacterium. Biochemistry 9(10):963–967Google Scholar
- Leuthner B, Aichinger C, Oehmen E, Koopmann E, Müller O, Müller P, Kahmann R, Bölker M, Schreier PH (2005) A H2O2-producing glyoxal oxidase is required for filamentous growth and pathogenicity in Ustilago maydis. Mol Gen Genomics 272(6):639–650Google Scholar
- Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 -ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402–408Google Scholar
- Mieslerová B, Lebeda A (2010) Influence of temperature and light conditions on germination, growth and conidiation of Oidium neolycopersici. J Phytopathol 158(9):616–627Google Scholar
- Smith JE, Deans SG, Anderson JG, Davis B (1977) The nature of fungal sporulation. In: Meyrath J, Bu'Lock JD (eds) Biotechnology and fungal differentiation. Academic Press, New York, pp 17–41Google Scholar
- Svingen T, Tonissen KF (2006) Hox transcription factors and their elusive mammalian gene targets. Heredity 97(2):88–96Google Scholar
- Ulrych A, Goldová J, Petříček M, Benada O, Kofroňová O, Rampírová P, Petříčková K, Branny P (2013) The pleiotropic effect of WD-40 domain containing proteins on cellular differentiation and production of secondary metabolites in Streptomyces coelicolor. Mol BioSyst 9(6):1453–1469PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vézina C, Singh K, Sehgal SN (1965) Sporulation of filamentous fungi in submerged culture. Mycologia 57(5):722–736Google Scholar
- Zhang S, Peng G, Xia Y (2010) Microcycle conidiation and the conidial properties in the entomopathogenic fungus Metarhizium acridum on agar medium. Biocontrol Sci Technol 20(8):809–819Google Scholar