Advertisement

Reverse metabolic engineering in lager yeast: impact of the NADH/NAD+ ratio on acetaldehyde production during the brewing process

  • Xin Xu
  • Jinjing Wang
  • Min Bao
  • Chengtuo Niu
  • Chunfeng Liu
  • Feiyun Zheng
  • Yongxian Li
  • Qi Li
Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

Acetaldehyde is synthesized by yeast during the main fermentation period of beer production, which causes an unpleasant off-flavor. Therefore, there has been extensive effort toward reducing acetaldehyde to obtain a beer product with better flavor and anti-staling ability. In this study, we discovered that acetaldehyde production in beer brewing is closely related with the intracellular NADH equivalent regulated by the citric acid cycle. However, there was no significant relationship between acetaldehyde production and amino acid metabolism. A reverse engineering strategy to increase the intracellular NADH/NAD+ ratio reduced the final acetaldehyde production level, and vice versa. This work offers new insight into acetaldehyde metabolism and further provides efficient strategies for reducing acetaldehyde production by the regulating the intracellular NADH/NAD+ ratio through cofactor engineering.

Keywords

Brewer’s yeast Acetaldehyde NADH/NAD+ Reverse metabolic engineering 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the National Science Foundation (No. 31571942, No. 31771963, No. 31601558), Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (No. 111-2-06), Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_1790), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JUSRP51306A, JUSRP51402A, JUDCF13008).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

253_2018_9517_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (124 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 123 kb)

References

  1. Albers E, Larsson C, Liden G, Niklasson C, Gustafsson L (1996) Influence of the nitrogen source on Saccharomyces cerevisiae anaerobic growth and product formation. Appl Environ Microbiol 62(9):3187–3195Google Scholar
  2. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W (2015) HTSeq—a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31(2):166–169.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aranda A, del Olmo M (2003) Response to acetaldehyde stress in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves a strain-dependent regulation of several ALD genes and is mediated by the general stress response pathway. Yeast 20(8):747–759.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.991 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakker BM, Bro C, Kotter P, Luttik MA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (2000) The mitochondrial alcohol dehydrogenase Adh3p is involved in a redox shuttle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 182(17):4730–4737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakker BM, Overkamp KM, van Maris AJ, Kotter P, Luttik MA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (2001) Stoichiometry and compartmentation of NADH metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 25(1):15–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Balagurunathan B, Tan L, Zhao H (2018) Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for acetaldehyde overproduction using pyruvate decarboxylase from Zymomonas mobilis. Enzym Microb Technol 109:58–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2017.09.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bisson LF, Fraenkel DG (1983) Involvement of kinases in glucose and fructose uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 80(6):1730–1734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blieck L, Toye G, Dumortier F, Verstrepen KJ, Delvaux FR, Thevelein JM, Van Dijck P (2007) Isolation and characterization of brewer’s yeast variants with improved fermentation performance under high-gravity conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(3):815–824.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02109-06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Byrne KP, Wolfe KH (2005) The Yeast Gene Order Browser: combining curated homology and syntenic context reveals gene fate in polyploid species. Genome Res 15(10):1456–1461.  https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.3672305 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Camarasa C, Grivet JP, Dequin S (2003) Investigation by 13C-NMR and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) deletion mutant analysis of pathways for succinate formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during anaerobic fermentation. Microbiology 149(Pt 9):2669–2678.  https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.26007-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camarasa C, Faucet V, Dequin S (2007) Role in anaerobiosis of the isoenzymes for Saccharomyces cerevisiae fumarate reductase encoded by OSM1 and FRDS1. Yeast 24(5):391–401.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Celton M, Goelzer A, Camarasa C, Fromion V, Dequin S (2012) A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng 14(4):366–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen X, Li S, Liu (2014) Engineering redox balance through cofactor systems. Trends Biotechnol 32(6):337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheraiti N, Guezenec S, Salmon JM (2005) Redox interactions between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces uvarum in mixed culture under enological conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(1):255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheraiti N, Sauvage FX, Salmon JM (2008) Acetaldehyde addition throughout the growth phase alleviates the phenotypic effect of zinc deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77(5):1093–1109.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-007-1234-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Winde H (2003) Functional genetics of industrial yeasts; of ancient skills and modern applications. In: de Winde JH (ed) Functional genetics of industrial yeasts, Topics in Current Genetics, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duong CT, Strack L, Futschik M, Katou Y, Nakao Y, Fujimura T, Shirahige K, Kodama Y, Nevoigt E (2011) Identification of Sc-type ILV6 as a target to reduce diacetyl formation in lager brewers' yeast. Metab Eng 13(6):638–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dzialo MC, Park R, Steensels J, Lievens B, Verstrepen KJ (2017) Physiology, ecology and industrial applications of aroma formation in yeast. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41(Supp_1):S95–s128.  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsre/fux031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehsani M, Fernández MR, Biosca JA, Julien A, Dequin S (2009) Engineering of 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase to reduce acetoin formation by glycerol-overproducing, low-alcohol Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(10):3196–3205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinrikson RL, Meredith SC (1984) Amino acid analysis by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography: Precolumn derivatization with phenylisothiocyanate. Anal Biochem 136(1):65–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(84)90307-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heux S, Cachon R, Dequin S (2006) Cofactor engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: expression of a H2O-forming NADH oxidase and impact on redox metabolism. Metab Eng 8(4):303–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill JE, Myers AM, Koerner TJ, Tzagoloff A (1986) Yeast/E. coli shuttle vectors with multiple unique restriction sites. Yeast 2(3):163–167.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.320020304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong KK, Vongsangnak W, Vemuri GN, Nielsen J (2011) Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(29):12179–12184.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103219108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hou J, Scalcinati G, Oldiges M, Vemuri GN (2010) Metabolic impact of increased NADH availability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 76(3):851–859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hubmann G, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Nevoigt E, Duitama J, Meurens N, Pais TM, Mathe L, Saerens S, Nguyen HT, Swinnen S, Verstrepen KJ, Concilio L, de Troostembergh JC, Thevelein JM (2013) Quantitative trait analysis of yeast biodiversity yields novel gene tools for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 17:68–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2013.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim KS, Rosenkrantz MS, Guarente L (1986) Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains two functional citrate synthase genes. Mol Cell Biol 6(6):1936–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kosugi S, Kiyoshi K, Oba T, Kusumoto K, Kadokura T, Nakazato A, Nakayama S (2014) Isolation of a high malic and low acetic acid-producing sake yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain screened from respiratory inhibitor 2,4-dinitrophenol (DNP)-resistant strains. J Biosci Bioeng 117(1):39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2013.06.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Li E, Mira de Orduña (2011) Evaluation of the acetaldehyde production and degradation potential of 26 enological Saccharomyces and non-Saccharomyces yeast strains in a resting cell model system. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 38(9):1391–1398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0924-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li E, Mira de Orduña (2017) Acetaldehyde kinetics of enological yeast during alcoholic fermentation in grape must. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 44(2):229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-016-1879-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li J, Li Y, Cui Z, Liang Q, Qi Q (2017) Enhancement of succinate yield by manipulating NADH/NAD(+) ratio and ATP generation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101(8):3153–3161.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8127-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Li F, Li Y, Sun LM, Chen X, An X, Yin C, Cao Y, Wu H, Song H (2018) Modular engineering intracellular NADH regeneration boosts extracellular electron transfer of Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. ACS Synth Biol 7(3):885–895.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acssynbio.7b00390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu L, Li Y, Du G, Chen J (2006a) Redirection of the NADH oxidation pathway in Torulopsis glabrata leads to an enhanced pyruvate production. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72(2):377–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-005-0284-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu L, Li Y, Shi Z, Du G, Chen J (2006b) Enhancement of pyruvate productivity in Torulopsis glabrata: increase of NAD+ availability. J Biotechnol 126(2):173–185.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative rene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 25(4):402–408.  https://doi.org/10.1006/meth.2001.1262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nevoigt E, Pilger R, Mast-Gerlach E, Schmidt U, Freihammer S, Eschenbrenner M, Garbe L, Stahl U (2002) Genetic engineering of brewing yeast to reduce the content of ethanol in beer. FEMS Yeast Res 2(2):225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pires EJ, Teixeira JA, Branyik T, Vicente AA (2014) Yeast: the soul of beer's aroma--a review of flavour-active esters and higher alcohols produced by the brewing yeast. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98(5):1937–1949.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-013-5470-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qin Y, Johnson CH, Liu L, Chen J (2011) Introduction of heterogeneous NADH reoxidation pathways into Torulopsis glabrata significantly increases pyruvate production efficiency. Korean J Chem Eng 28(4):1078–1084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Remize F, Andrieu E, Dequin S (2000) Engineering of the pyruvate dehydrogenase bypass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: role of the cytosolic Mg(2+) and mitochondrial K(+) acetaldehyde dehydrogenases Ald6p and Ald4p in acetate formation during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(8):3151–3159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roustan JL, Sablayrolles JM (2002) Modification of the acetaldehyde concentration during alcoholic fermentation and effects on fermentation kinetics. J Biosci Bioeng 93(4):367–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saerens SM, Duong CT, Nevoigt E (2010) Genetic improvement of brewer’s yeast: current state, perspectives and limits. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 86(5):1195–1212.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-010-2486-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saison D, De Schutter DP, Uyttenhove B, Delvaux F, Delvaux FR (2009) Contribution of staling compounds to the aged flavour of lager beer by studying their flavour thresholds. Food Chem 114(4):1206–1215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.10.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shi XC, Zou YN, Chen Y, Zheng C, Li BB, Xu JH, Shen XN, Ying HJ (2016) A water-forming NADH oxidase regulates metabolism in anaerobic fermentation. Biotechnol Biofuels 9:103.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-016-0517-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vuoristo KS, Mars AE, Sanders JP, Eggink G, Weusthuis RA (2015) Metabolic engineering of TCA cycle for production of chemicals. Trends Biotechnol 34(3):191–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walsh CT, Tu BP, Tang Y (2017) Eight kinetically stable but thermodynamically activated molecules that power cell metabolism. Chem Rev 118(4):1460–1494.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00510 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang ZY, Wang JJ, Liu XF, He XP, Zhang BR (2009) Recombinant industrial brewing yeast strains with ADH2 interruption using self-cloning GSH1+CUP1 cassette. FEMS Yeast Res 9(4):574–581.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00502.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang Y, Halls C, Zhang J, Matsuno M, Zhang Y, Yu O (2011) Stepwise increase of resveratrol biosynthesis in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 13(5):455–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2011.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang J, Shen N, Yin H, Liu C, Li Y, Li Q (2013) Development of industrial brewing yeast with low acetaldehyde production and improved flavor stability. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169(3):1016–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang P, Yang X, Lin B, Huang J, Tao Y (2017) Cofactor self-sufficient whole-cell biocatalysts for the production of 2-phenylethanol. Metab Eng 44:143–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2017.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Xu X, Liu C, Niu C, Wang J, Zheng F, Li Y, Li Q (2018) Rationally designed perturbation factor drives evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for industrial application. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 45:869–880.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-018-2057-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yan D, Wang C, Zhou J, Liu Y, Yang M, Xing J (2014) Construction of reductive pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for effective succinic acid fermentation at low pH value. Bioresour Technol 156:232–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoshida S, Imoto J, Minato T, Oouchi R, Sugihara M, Imai T, Ishiguro T, Mizutani S, Tomita M, Soga T, Yoshimoto H (2008) Development of bottom-fermenting Saccharomyces strains that produce high SO2 levels, using integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(9):2787–2796.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.01781-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of BiotechnologyJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Food Science and TechnologyJiangnan UniversityWuxiChina
  3. 3.School of BiotechnologyJiangnan UniversityWuxiPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations