Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 1, pp 211–223 | Cite as

Efficient production of lycopene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by enzyme engineering and increasing membrane flexibility and NAPDH production

  • Juhyun Hong
  • Seong-Hee Park
  • Sujin Kim
  • Seon-Won Kim
  • Ji-Sook HahnEmail author
Biotechnological products and process engineering

Abstract

Lycopene is a red carotenoid pigment with strong antioxidant activity. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is considered a promising host to produce lycopene, but lycopene toxicity is one of the limiting factors for high-level production. In this study, we used heterologous lycopene biosynthesis genes crtE and crtI from Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous and crtB from Pantoea agglomerans for lycopene production in S. cerevisiae. The crtE, crtB, and crtI genes were integrated into the genome of S. cerevisiae CEN.PK2-1C strain, while deleting DPP1 and LPP1 genes to inhibit a competing pathway producing farnesol. Lycopene production was further improved by inhibiting ergosterol production via downregulation of ERG9 expression and by deleting ROX1 or MOT3 genes encoding transcriptional repressors for mevalonate and sterol biosynthetic pathways. To further increase lycopene production, CrtE and CrtB mutants with improved activities were isolated by directed evolution, and subsequently, the mutated genes were randomly integrated into the engineered lycopene-producing strains via delta-integration. To relieve lycopene toxicity by increasing unsaturated fatty acid content in cell membranes, the OLE1 gene encoding stearoyl-CoA 9-desaturase was overexpressed. In combination with the overexpression of STB5 gene encoding a transcription factor involved in NADPH production, the final strain produced up to 41.8 mg/gDCW of lycopene, which is approximately 74.6-fold higher than that produced in the initial strain.

Keywords

Delta-integration Directed evolution Lycopene Ole1 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Stb5 

Notes

Funding

This research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2017R1E1A1A01073523 and 2016M3D3A01913245).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

253_2018_9449_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (427 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 426 kb)

References

  1. Asadollahi MA, Maury J, Moller K, Nielsen KF, Schalk M, Clark A, Nielsen J (2008) Production of plant sesquiterpenes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of ERG9 repression on sesquiterpene biosynthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 99(3):666–677.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21581 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Asadollahi MA, Maury J, Schalk M, Clark A, Nielsen J (2010) Enhancement of farnesyl diphosphate pool as direct precursor of sesquiterpenes through metabolic engineering of the mevalonate pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 106(1):86–96.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22668 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baek SH, Kwon EY, Bae SJ, Cho BR, Kim SY, Hahn JS (2017) Improvement of D-lactic acid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae under acidic conditions by evolutionary and rational metabolic engineering. Biotechnol J 12:1700015.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cadiere A, Galeote V, Dequin S (2010) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae zinc factor protein Stb5p is required as a basal regulator of the pentose phosphate pathway. FEMS Yeast Res 10(7):819–827.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00672.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen Y, Xiao W, Wang Y, Liu H, Li X, Yuan Y (2016) Lycopene overproduction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through combining pathway engineering with host engineering. Microb Cell Factories 15(1):113.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0509-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM (2013) Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res 41(7):4336–4343.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt135 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Donald KA, Hampton RY, Fritz IB (1997) Effects of overproduction of the catalytic domain of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase on squalene synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 63(9):3341–3344PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang Z, Chen Z, Wang S, Shi P, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Xiao J, Huang Z (2017) Overexpression of OLE1 enhances cytoplasmic membrane stability and confers resistance to cadmium in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e02319–e02316.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02319-16 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Faulkner A, Chen X, Rush J, Horazdovsky B, Waechter CJ, Carman GM, Sternweis PC (1999) The LPP1 and DPP1 gene products account for most of the isoprenoid phosphate phosphatase activities in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 274(21):14831–14837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gueldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH (2002) A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 30(6):e23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hector RE, Bowman MJ, Skory CD, Cotta MA (2009) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae YMR315W gene encodes an NADP(H)-specific oxidoreductase regulated by the transcription factor Stb5p in response to NADPH limitation. New Biotechnol 26(3–4):171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2009.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang MJ, Lee YM, Yoon SH, Kim JH, Ock SW, Jung KH, Shin YC, Keasling JD, Kim SW (2005) Identification of genes affecting lycopene accumulation in Escherichia coli using a shot-gun method. Biotechnol Bioeng 91(5):636–642.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20539 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Kennedy MA, Bard M (2001) Positive and negative regulation of squalene synthase (ERG9), an ergosterol biosynthetic gene, in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1517(2):177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kim S, Hahn JS (2015) Efficient production of 2,3-butanediol in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by eliminating ethanol and glycerol production and redox rebalancing. Metab Eng 31:94–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Larochelle M, Drouin S, Robert F, Turcotte B (2006) Oxidative stress-activated zinc cluster protein Stb5 has dual activator/repressor functions required for pentose phosphate pathway regulation and NADPH production. Mol Cell Biol 26(17):6690–6701.  https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.02450-05 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu P, Sun L, Sun Y, Shang F, Yan G (2016) Decreased fluidity of cell membranes causes a metal ion deficiency in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae producing carotenoids. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 43(4):525–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-015-1728-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Meadows AL, Hawkins KM, Tsegaye Y, Antipov E, Kim Y, Raetz L, Dahl RH, Tai A, Mahatdejkul-Meadows T, Xu L, Zhao L, Dasika MS, Murarka A, Lenihan J, Eng D, Leng JS, Liu CL, Wenger JW, Jiang H, Chao L, Westfall P, Lai J, Ganesan S, Jackson P, Mans R, Platt D, Reeves CD, Saija PR, Wichmann G, Holmes VF, Benjamin K, Hill PW, Gardner TS, Tsong AE (2016) Rewriting yeast central carbon metabolism for industrial isoprenoid production. Nature 537(7622):694–697.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19769 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Miyagi H, Kawai S, Murata K (2009) Two sources of mitochondrial NADPH in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 284(12):7553–7560.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M804100200 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Montanes FM, Pascual-Ahuir A, Proft M (2011) Repression of ergosterol biosynthesis is essential for stress resistance and is mediated by the Hog1 MAP kinase and the Mot3 and Rox1 transcription factors. Mol Microbiol 79(4):1008–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07502.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mumberg D, Muller R, Funk M (1995) Yeast vectors for the controlled expression of heterologous proteins in different genetic backgrounds. Gene 156(1):119–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nasution O, Lee YM, Kim E, Lee Y, Kim W, Choi W (2017) Overexpression of OLE1 enhances stress tolerance and constitutively activates the MAPK HOG pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 114(3):620–631.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26093 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Otero JM, Vongsangnak W, Asadollahi MA, Olivares-Hernandes R, Maury J, Farinelli L, Barlocher L, Osteras M, Schalk M, Clark A, Nielsen J (2010) Whole genome sequencing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: from genotype to phenotype for improved metabolic engineering applications. BMC Genomics 11:723.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-723 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Ozaydin B, Burd H, Lee TS, Keasling JD (2013) Carotenoid-based phenotypic screen of the yeast deletion collection reveals new genes with roles in isoprenoid production. Metab Eng 15:174–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2012.07.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Paradise EM, Kirby J, Chan R, Keasling JD (2008) Redirection of flux through the FPP branch-point in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by down-regulating squalene synthase. Biotechnol Bioeng 100(2):371–378.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21766 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Paramasivan K, Mutturi S (2017) Regeneration of NADPH coupled with HMG-CoA reductase activity increases squalene synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Agric Food Chem 65(37):8162–8170.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02945 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pegklidou K, Mantzouridou F, Tsimidou MZ (2008) Lycopene production using Blakeslea trispora in the presence of 2-methyl imidazole: yield, selectivity, and safety aspects. J Agric Food Chem 56(4482):4490Google Scholar
  27. Pereira FB, Guimaraes PM, Teixeira JA, Domingues L (2010) Selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for efficient very high gravity bio-ethanol fermentation processes. Biotechnol Lett 32(11):1655–1661.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-010-0330-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ro D-K, Paradise EM, Ouellet M, Fisher KJ, Newman KL, Ndungu JM, Ho KA, Eachus RA, Ham TS, Kirby J, Chang MCY, Withers ST, Shiba Y, Sarpong R, Keasling JD (2006) Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 440:940.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04640 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Scalcinati G, Partow S, Siewers V, Schalk M, Daviet L, Nielsen J (2012) Combined metabolic engineering of precursor and co-factor supply to increase alpha-santalene production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Factories 11:117.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-11-117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmidt-Dannert C (2000) Engineering novel carotenoids in microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11(3):255–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shi YQ, Xin XL, Yuan QP (2012) Improved lycopene production by Blakeslea trispora with isopentenyl compounds and metabolic precursors. Biotechnol Lett 34(5):849–852.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0839-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sung WS, Lee IS, Lee DG (2007) Damage to the cytoplasmic membrane and cell death caused by lycopene in Candida albicans. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17(11):1797–1804PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Takahashi S, Yeo Y, Greenhagen BT, McMullin T, Song L, Maurina-Brunker J, Rosson R, Noel JP, Chappell J (2007) Metabolic engineering of sesquiterpene metabolism in yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(1):170–181.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21216 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Tippmann S, Scalcinati G, Siewers V, Nielsen J (2016) Production of farnesene and santalene by Saccharomyces cerevisiae using fed-batch cultivations with RQ-controlled feed. Biotechnol Bioeng 113(1):72–81.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.25683 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. van Dijken JP, Bauer J, Brambilla L, Duboc P, Francois JM, Gancedo C, Giuseppin ML, Heijnen JJ, Hoare M, Lange HC, Madden EA, Niederberger P, Nielsen J, Parrou JL, Petit T, Porro D, Reuss M, van Riel N, Rizzi M, Steensma HY, Verrips CT, Vindelov J, Pronk JT (2000) An interlaboratory comparison of physiological and genetic properties of four Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Enzym Microb Technol 26(9–10):706–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verwaal R, Jiang Y, Wang J, Daran JM, Sandmann G, van den Berg JA, van Ooyen AJ (2010) Heterologous carotenoid production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae induces the pleiotropic drug resistance stress response. Yeast 27(12):983–998.  https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1807 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Xie W, Lv X, Ye L, Zhou P, Yu H (2015) Construction of lycopene-overproducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by combining directed evolution and metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 30:69–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2015.04.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamada R, Taniguchi N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A (2010) Cocktail delta-integration: a novel method to construct cellulolytic enzyme expression ratio-optimized yeast strains. Microb Cell Factories 9:32.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-9-32 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yoon SH, Lee YM, Kim JE, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim JY, Jung KH, Shin YC, Keasling JD, Kim SW (2006) Enhanced lycopene production in Escherichia coli engineered to synthesize isopentenyl diphosphate and dimethylallyl diphosphate from mevalonate. Biotechnol Bioeng 94(6):1025–1032.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.20912 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang Y, Nielsen J, Liu Z (2017) Engineering yeast metabolism for production of terpenoids for use as perfume ingredients, pharmaceuticals and biofuels. FEMS Yeast Res 17(8).  https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fox080
  41. Zhao X, Shi F, Zhan W (2015) Overexpression of ZWF1 and POS5 improves carotenoid biosynthesis in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett Appl Microbiol 61(4):354–360.  https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12463 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Institute of Chemical ProcessesSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Division of Applied Life Science (BK21 Plus), PMBBRC, Institute of Agriculture and Life SciencesGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations