Advertisement

A new strategy for fed-batch process control of HEK293 cell cultures based on alkali buffer addition monitoring: comparison with O.U.R. dynamic method

  • I. Martínez-Monge
  • P. Comas
  • J. Triquell
  • M. Lecina
  • A. Casablancas
  • J. J. Cairó
Biotechnological products and process engineering
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

The increasing demand for biopharmaceuticals produced in mammalian cells has driven the industry to enhance productivity of bioprocesses through different strategies. This is why fed-batch and perfusion cultures are considered more attractive choices than batch processes. In this context, the availability of reliable online measuring systems for cell density and metabolic activity estimation will help the application of these processes. The present work focuses on the comparison of two different monitoring tools for indirect estimation of biomass concentration in a HEK293 cell cultures producing IFN-γ: on one side, the oxygen uptake rate (O.U.R.) determination, by means of application of the dynamic method measurement which is already a widely used tool and, on the other side, a new robust online monitoring tool based on the alkali buffer addition used to maintain the pH set point. Both strategies allow a proper monitoring of cell growth and metabolic activity, with precise identification of the balanced cell growth and the most important action in the process, as is the media feeding. The application of these monitoring systems in fed-batch processes allows extending the growth of HEK293 cells, which in turn results in higher final cell concentrations compared with Batch strategy (7 · 106 cells mL−1), achieving 14 · 106 cells mL−1 for the fed-batch based on O.U.R. and 19 · 106 cells mL−1 for the fed-batch based on the alkali addition. Product titter is also increased in respect of the batch strategy (3.70 mg L−1), resulting in 8.27 mg L−1 when fed-batch was based on O.U.R. and 11.49 mg L−1 when it was based on the alkali buffer strategy. Results prove that fed-batch strategy based on the alkali buffer addition is a robust online monitoring method that has shown its great potential to optimize the feeding strategy in HEK293 fed-batch cultures.

Keywords

HEK293 O.U.R. Cell culture Fed-batch Lactate Alkali buffer addition monitoring 

Notes

Funding

The present work has been supported by the grant FI-DGR (Generalitat de Catalunya, Catalonia, Spain).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical statements

The authors are aware with the ethical responsibilities required by the journal and are committed to comply them.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Supplementary material

253_2018_9388_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (218 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 218 kb)

References

  1. Abu-Absi S, Xu S, Graham H, Dalal N, Boyer M, Dave K (2013) Cell culture process operations for recombinant protein production. In: Zhou W., Kantardjieff A. (eds) Mammalian cell cultures for biologics manufacturing. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, vol 139. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. Altamirano C, Paredes C, Cairo JJ, Godia F (2000) Improvement of CHO cell culture medium formulation: simultaneous substitution of glucose and glutamine. Biotechnol Prog 16:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Casablancas A, Gámez X, Lecina M, Solà C, Cairó JJ, Gòdia F (2013) Comparison of control strategies for fed-batch culture of hybridoma cells based on on-line monitoring of oxygen uptake rate, optical cell density and glucose concentration. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 88:1680–1689.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Côté J, Garnier A, Massie B, Kamen A (1998) Serum-free production of recombinant proteins and adenoviral vectors by 293SF-3F6 cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 59:567–575.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980905)59:5<567::AID-BIT6>3.0.CO;2-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cruz HJ, Freitas CM, Alves PM, Moreira JL, Carrondo MJT (2000) Effects of ammonia and lactate on growth, metabolism, and productivity of BHK cells. Enzym Microb Technol 27:43–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00151-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Jesus M, Wurm FM (2011) Manufacturing recombinant proteins in kg-ton quantities using animal cells in bioreactors. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 78:184–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dingermann T (2008) Recombinant therapeutic proteins: production platforms and challenges. Biotechnol J 3:90–97.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200700214 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Durocher Y, Butler M (2009) Expression systems for therapeutic glycoprotein production. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:700–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontova A, Lecina M, López-Repullo J, Martínez-Monge I, Comas P, Bragós R, Cairó JJ (2018) A simplified implementation of the stationary liquid mass balance method for on-line OUR monitoring in animal cell cultures. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 93:1757–1766.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.5551 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gagnon M, Hiller G, Luan Y-T, Kittredge A, DeFelice J, Drapeau D (2011) High-end pH-controlled delivery of glucose effectively suppresses lactate accumulation in CHO fed-batch cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:1328–1337.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Halestrap A, Price N (1999) The proton-linked monocarboxylate transporter (MCT) family: structure, function and regulation. Biochem J 343(Pt 2):281–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Höpfner T, Bluma A, Rudolph G, Lindner P, Scheper T (2010) A review of non-invasive optical-based image analysis systems for continuous bioprocess monitoring. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 33:247–256.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-009-0319-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Huang Y-M, Hu W, Rustandi E, Chang K, Yusuf-Makagiansar H, Ryll T (2010) Maximizing productivity of CHO cell-based fed-batch culture using chemically defined media conditions and typical manufacturing equipment. Biotechnol Prog 26:1400–1410.  https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.436 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Junker BH, Reddy J, Gbewonyo K, Greasham R (1994) On-line and in-situ monitoring technology for cell density measurement in microbial and animal cell cultures. Bioprocess Eng 10:195–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamen AA, Bédard C, Tom R, Perret S, Jardin B (1996) On-line monitoring of respiration in recombinant-baculovirus infected and uninfected insect cell bioreactor cultures. Biotechnol Bioeng 50:36–48.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960405)50:1<36::AID-BIT5>3.0.CO;2-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurokawa H, Park YS, Iijima S, Kobayashi T (1994) Growth characteristics in fed-batch culture of hybridoma cells with control of glucose and glutamine concentrations. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:95–103.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260440114 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kussow CM, Zhou W, Gryte DM, Hu W-S (1995) Monitoring of mammalian cell growth and virus production process using on-line oxygen uptake rate measurement. Enzym Microb Technol 17:779–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(94)00035-P CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lao M-S, Toth D (1997) Effects of ammonium and lactate on growth and metabolism of a recombinant Chinese hamster ovary cell culture. Biotechnol Prog 13:688–691.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bp9602360 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lecina M, Soley A, Gràcia J, Espunya E, Lázaro B, Cairó JJ, Gòdia F (2006) Application of on-line OUR measurements to detect actions points to improve baculovirus-insect cell cultures in bioreactors. J Biotechnol 125:385–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.03.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lecina M, Tintó A, Gálvez J, Gòdia F, Cairó JJ (2011) Continuous perfusion culture of encapsulated hybridoma cells. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 86:1555–1564.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2680 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee YY, Yap MGS, Hu W-S, Wong KTK (2003) Low-glutamine fed-batch cultures of 293-HEK serum-free suspension cells for adenovirus production. Biotechnol Prog 19:501–509.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bp025638o CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Liste-Calleja L, Lecina M, Lopez-Repullo J, Albiol J, Solà C, Cairó JJ (2015) Lactate and glucose concomitant consumption as a self-regulated pH detoxification mechanism in HEK293 cell cultures. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:9951–9960.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6855-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez VS, Dietmair S, Quek L-E, Hodson MP, Gray P, Nielsen LK (2013) Flux balance analysis of CHO cells before and after a metabolic switch from lactate production to consumption. Biotechnol Bioeng 110:660–666.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.24728 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mulukutla BC, Gramer M, Hu W-S (2012) On metabolic shift to lactate consumption in fed-batch culture of mammalian cells. Metab Eng 14:138–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.YMBEN.2011.12.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mulukutla BC, Kale J, Kalomeris T, Jacobs M, Hiller GW (2017) Identification and control of novel growth inhibitors in fed-batch cultures of Chinese hamster ovary cells. Biotechnol Bioeng 114:1779–1790.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26313 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ozturk SS, Riley MR, Palsson BO (1992) Effects of ammonia and lactate on hybridoma growth, metabolism, and antibody production. Biotechnol Bioeng 39:418–431.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260390408 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Paredes C, Sanfeliu A, Cardenas F, Cairó JJ, Gòdia F (1998) Estimation of the intracellular fluxes for a hybridoma cell line by material balances. Enzym Microb Technol 23:187–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(98)00023-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pereira S, Kildegaard HF, Andersen MR (2018) Impact of CHO metabolism on cell growth and protein production: an overview of toxic and inhibiting metabolites and nutrients. Biotechnol J 13:1700499.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poole RC, Halestrap AP (1993) Transport of lactate and other monocarboxylates across mammalian plasma membranes. Am J Physiol Physiol 264:C761–C782.  https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.1993.264.4.C761 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ruffieux P-A, Von Stockar U, Marison IW (1998) Measurement of volumetric (OUR) and determination of specific (qO2) oxygen uptake rates in animal cell cultures. J Biotechnol 63:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanfeliu A, Paredes C, Cairó JJ, Gódia F (1997) Identification of key patterns in the metabolism of hybridoma cells in culture. Enzym Microb Technol 21:421–428.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(97)00015-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sauer PW, Burky JE, Wesson MC, Sternard HD, Qu L (2000) A high-yielding, generic fed-batch cell culture process for production of recombinant antibodies. Biotechnol Bioeng 67:585–597.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(20000305)67:5<585::AID-BIT9>3.0.CO;2-H CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Walsh G (2014) Biopharmaceutical benchmarks 2014. Nat Biotechnol 32:992–1000.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3040 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wong TKK, Nielsen LK, Greenfield PF, Reid S (1994) Relationship between oxygen uptake rate and time of infection of Sf9 insect cells infected with a recombinant baculovirus. Cytotechnology 15:157–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00762390 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wurm FM (2004) Production of recombinant protein therapeutics in cultivated mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 22:1393–1398.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yoon S, Konstantinov KB (1994) Continuous, real-time monitoring of the oxygen uptake rate (OUR) in animal cell bioreactors. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:983–990.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260440815 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhou W, Hu W-S (1994) On-line characterization of a hybridoma cell culture process. Biotechnol Bioeng 44:170–177.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260440205 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental EngineeringUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaCerdanyola del VallèsSpain
  2. 2.IQS School of EngineeringUniversitat Ramon LlullBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations