Advertisement

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 103, Issue 4, pp 1789–1799 | Cite as

Optimization of the Gal4/UAS transgenic tools in zebrafish

  • Yunsheng ZhangEmail author
  • Jiawei Ouyang
  • Jingrong Qie
  • Gongyuan Zhang
  • Liangguo Liu
  • Pinhong Yang
Applied genetics and molecular biotechnology
  • 185 Downloads

Abstract

The Gal4/UAS system provides a powerful tool to analyze the function of genes. The system has been employed extensively in zebrafish; however, cytotoxicity of Gal4 and methylation of UAS can hinder future applications of Gal4/UAS in zebrafish. In this study, we provide quantitative data on the cytotoxicity of Gal4-FF and KalTA4 in zebrafish embryos. A better balance between induction efficiency and toxicity was shown when the injection dosage was 20 pg for Gal4-FF and 30 pg for KalTA4. We tested the DNA methylation of UAS in different copies (3×, 5×, 7×, 9×, 11×, and 14×), and the results showed, for the first time, that the degree of UAS methylation increases with the increase in the copy number of UAS. We detected insertions of the Tol2-mediated transgene in the Gal4 line and found as many as three sites of insertion, on average; only about 20% of individuals contained single-site insertion in F1 generation. We suggested that the screening of Gal4 lines with single-site insertion is essential when Tol2-mediated Gal4 transgenic lines are created. Moreover, we designed a novel 5 × non-repetitive UAS (5 × nrUAS) to reduce the appeal of multicopy UAS as a target for methylation. Excitingly, the 5 × nrUAS is less prone to methylation compared to 5 × UAS. We hope the results will facilitate the future application of the Gal4/UAS system in zebrafish research.

Keywords

Gal4/UAS Toxicity Methylation Zebrafish 

Notes

Funding information

This research is funded by the Hunan Natural Science Foundation of China (2018JJ3371), the National Foundation of Natural Science of China (31572619), Science Foundation of Hunan university of Arts and Science (16BSQD47), and also by the development funds of Chinese central government to guide local science and technology (No.2017CT5013).

Compliance with ethical standards

This article does not involve human participants. All zebrafish experiments were conducted in accordance with the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were approved by Hunan University of Arts and Science.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Akitake CM, Macurak M, Halpern ME, Goll MG (2011) Transgenerational analysis of transcriptional silencing in zebrafish. Dev Biol 352(2):191–201Google Scholar
  2. Asakawa K, Kawakami K (2009) The tol2-mediated gal4-uas method for gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Methods 49(3):275–281Google Scholar
  3. Asakawa K, Suster ML, Mizusawa K, Nagayoshi S, Kotani T, Urasaki A, Kishimoto Y, Hibi M, Kawakami K (2008) Genetic dissection of neural circuits by tol2 transposon mediated gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(4):1255–1260Google Scholar
  4. Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, Concordet JP, Del Bene F (2014) Highly efficient crispr/cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res 24(1):142–153Google Scholar
  5. Baier H, Scott EK (2009) Genetic and optical targeting of neural circuits and behavior--zebrafish in the spotlight. Curr Opin Neurobiol 19(5):553–560Google Scholar
  6. Banerjee S, Mino E, Fisher ES, Bhat MA (2017) A versatile genetic tool to study midline glia function in the drosophila cns. Dev Biol 429:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbbio.2017.06.010 Google Scholar
  7. Bougioukli S, Sugiyama O, Alluri R, Ortega B, Lieberman J (2017) Comparison of two lentiviral two-step transcriptional amplification systems using gal4ff or gal4vp16 transactivators for ex vivo regional gene therapy in bone repair. Mol Ther 25(5):214Google Scholar
  8. Carey M, Kakidani H, Leatherwood J, Mostashari F, Ptashne M (1989) An amino-terminal fragment of gal4 binds dna as a dimer. J Mol Biol 209(3):423–432Google Scholar
  9. Daba A, Koromilas AE, Pantopoulos K (2012) Alternative ferritin mrna translation via internal initiation. RNA 18(3):547–556Google Scholar
  10. Davidson AE, Balciunas D, Mohn D, Shaffer J, Hermanson S, Sivasubbu S, Cliff MP, Hackett PB, Ekker SC (2003) Efficient gene delivery and gene expression in zebrafish using the sleeping beauty transposon. Dev Biol 263(2):191–202Google Scholar
  11. Davison JM, Akitake CM, Goll MG, Rhee JM, Gosse N, Baier H, Halpern ME, Leach SD, Parsons MJ (2007) Transactivation from gal4-vp16 transgenic insertions for tissue-specific cell labeling and ablation in zebrafish. Dev Biol 304(2):811–824Google Scholar
  12. Distel M, Wullimann MF, Köster RW (2009) Optimized gal4 genetics for permanent gene expression mapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(32):13365–13370Google Scholar
  13. Dorer DR (1997) Do transgene arrays form heterochromatin in vertebrates? Transgenic Res 6(1):3–10Google Scholar
  14. Ehrlich M (2003) Expression of various genes is controlled by dna methylation during mammalian development. J Cell Biochem 88(5):899–910Google Scholar
  15. Garrick D, Fiering S, Martin DIK, Whitelaw E (1998) Repeat-induced gene silencing in mammals. Nat Genet 18(1):56–59Google Scholar
  16. Giniger E, Varnum SM, Ptashne M (1985) Specific dna binding of gal4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast. Cell 40(4):767–774Google Scholar
  17. Goll MG, Anderson R, Stainier DYR, Spradling AC, Halpern ME (2009) Transcriptional silencing and reactivation in transgenic zebrafish. Genetics 182(3):747–755Google Scholar
  18. Guan B, Hu W, Zhang TL, Wang YP, Zhu ZY (2008) Metabolism traits of ‘all-fish’ growth hormone transgenic common carp (Cyprinus carpio l.). Aquaculture 284(1–4):217–223Google Scholar
  19. Halpern ME, Rhee J, Goll MG, Akitake CM, Parsons M, Leach SD (2008) Gal4/uas transgenic tools and their application to zebrafish. Zebrafish 5(2):97–110Google Scholar
  20. Hartley KO, Nutt SL, Amaya E (2002) Targeted gene expression in transgenic xenopus using the binary gal4-uas system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(3):1377–1382Google Scholar
  21. Inbal A, Topczewski J, Solnicakrezel L (2006) Targeted gene expression in the zebrafish prechordal plate. Genesis 44(12):584–588Google Scholar
  22. Kang T, Martins T, Sadowski I (1993) Wild type gal4 binds cooperatively to the gal1-10 UASG in vitro. J Biol Chem 268(13):9629–9635Google Scholar
  23. Kawakami K, Takeda H, Kawakami N, Kobayashi M, Matsuda N, Mishina AM (2004) A transposon-mediated gene trap approach identifies developmentally regulated genes in zebrafish. Dev Cell 7(1):133–144Google Scholar
  24. Kedde M, Strasser MJ, Boldajipour B, Oude JV, Slanchev K, Sage CI, Nagel R, Voorhoeve PM, Duijse JV, øRom UA, Lund AH, Perrakis A, Raz E, Agami R (2007) RNA-binding protein Dnd1 inhibits microRNA access to target mRNA. Cell 131:1273–1286Google Scholar
  25. Köster RW, Fraser SE (2001) Tracing transgene expression in living zebrafish embryos. Dev Biol 233(2):329–346Google Scholar
  26. Li E (2002) Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 3(9):662–673Google Scholar
  27. Li FY, Papworth M, Minczuk M, Rohde C, Zhang YY, Ragozin S, Jeltsch A (2007) Chimeric dna methyltransferases target dna methylation to specific dna sequences and repress expression of target genes. Nucleic Acids Res 35(1):100–112Google Scholar
  28. Nagayoshi S, Hayashi E, Abe G, Osato N, Asakawa K, Urasaki A, Horikawa K, lkeo K, Takeda H, Kawakami K (2008) Insertional mutagenesis by the tol2 transposon-mediated enhancer trap approach generated mutations in two developmental genes: tcf7 and synembryn-like. Development 135(1):159–169Google Scholar
  29. Ogura E, Okuda Y, Kondoh H, Kamachi Y (2010) Adaptation of gal4 activators for enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Dev Dyn 238(3):641–655Google Scholar
  30. Ovchinnikov DA, van Zuylen WJ, Debats CE, Alexander KA, Kellie S, Hume DA (2008) Expression of gal4-dependent transgenes in cells of the mononuclear phagocyte system labeled with enhanced cyan fluorescent protein using csf1r-gal4vp16/uas-ecfp double-transgenic mice. J Leukoc Biol 83(2):430–433Google Scholar
  31. Pang SC, Wang HP, Zhu ZY, Sun YH (2015) Transcriptional activity and dna methylation dynamics of the gal4/uas system in zebrafish. Mar Biotechnol 17(5):593–603Google Scholar
  32. Sadowski I, Ma J, Triezenberg S, Ptashne M (1988) Gal4-vp16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. Nature 335(6190):563–564Google Scholar
  33. Sato T, Hamaoka T, Aizawa H, Hosoya T, Okamoto H (2007) Genetic single-cell mosaic analysis implicates ephrinb2 reverse signaling in projections from the posterior tectum to the hindbrain in zebrafish. J Neurosci 27(20):5271–5279Google Scholar
  34. Scheer N, Camposortega JA (1999) Use of the gal4-uas technique for targeted gene expression in the zebrafish. Mech Dev 80(2):153–158Google Scholar
  35. Thresher R, Van dKJ, Campbell G, Grewe P, Canning M, Barney M, Bax NJ, Dunham R, Su B, Fulton W (2014) Sex-ratio-biasing constructs for the control of invasive lower vertebrates. Nat Biotechnol 32:424–427Google Scholar
  36. Tsubota T, Uchino K, Kamimura M, Ishikawa M, Hamamoto H, Sekimizu K, Sezutsu H (2014) Establishment of transgenic silkworms expressing gal4 specifically in the haemocyte oenocytoid cells. Insect Mol Biol 23(2):165–174Google Scholar
  37. Webster N, Jin JR, Green S, Hollis M, Chambon P (1988) The yeast uasg is a transcriptional enhancer in human hela cells in the presence of the gal4 trans-activator. Cell 52(2):169–178Google Scholar
  38. Xiong F, Wei ZQ, Zhu ZY, Sun YH (2013) Targeted expression in zebrafish primordial germ cells by cre/loxp and gal4/uas systems. Mar Biotechnol 15(5):526–539Google Scholar
  39. Zhang YS, Chen J, Cui XJ, Luo DJ, Xia H, Dai J, Zhu ZY, Hu W (2015) A controllable on-off strategy for the reproductive containment of fish. Sci Rep-UK 5(5):73–78Google Scholar
  40. Zhong CR, Song YL, Wang YP, Li YM, Liao LJ, Xie SG, Zhu ZY (2012) Growth hormone transgene effects on growth performance are inconsistent among offspring derived from different homozygous transgenic common carp ( cyprinus carpio, l.). Aquaculture s356–357(4):404–441Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunsheng Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jiawei Ouyang
    • 1
  • Jingrong Qie
    • 1
  • Gongyuan Zhang
    • 1
  • Liangguo Liu
    • 1
  • Pinhong Yang
    • 1
  1. 1.Collaborative Innovation Center for Efficient and Health Production of Fisheries in Hunan Province, Key Laboratory of Health Aquaculture and Product Processing in Dongting Lake Area of Hunan Province, Zoology Key Laboratory of Hunan Higher EducationHunan University of Arts and ScienceChangdePeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations