Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Development of a quantitative PCR method to differentiate between viable and nonviable bacteria in environmental water samples

Abstract

Ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA) treatment of pure culture and environmental waters at low concentrations (1.0–7.5 µg/ml) indicated effective enumeration of viable and viable but nonculturable Escherichia coli in pure cultures, creek waters, and secondary activated sludge effluent samples by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) amplification of the uidA and fliC gene targets at turbidity values <10 NTU. However, EMA treatment was not effective in primary clarifier and secondary trickling filter effluents where turbidities were ≥10 NTU. In viable pure cultures, rapidly dividing and senescent cells were most affected by increasing EMA concentrations. Amplification of heat-killed pure bacterial cultures decreased 4 to 6 logs depending on EMA concentration and culture age. The greatest difference was observed in 5-h cultures using 7.5 μg/ml EMA. Turbidity (≥100 NTU) in environmental samples inhibited EMA effectiveness on viability discrimination. Enumeration of E. coli in certain wastewaters using EMA-qPCR was similar to culture suggesting that EMA treatment could be incorporated into qPCR assays for the quantification of viable bacteria increasing assay time no more than 30 min. Our results indicate that EMA can be used in routine qPCR assays, but optimum conditions for exposure must be identified for each sample type due to sample matrix effects such as turbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Bernhardt J, Weibezahn J, Scharf C, Hecker M (2003) Bacillus subtilis during feast and famine: visualization of the overall regulation of protein synthesis during glucose starvation by proteome analysis. Genome Res 13(2):224–237

  2. Boone AM (2007) Rapid detection techniques useful for primary indicators of activated sludge treatment optimization. Master’s Thesis—Spring 2007. John Hopkins University

  3. Cantwell RE, Hofmann R (2008) Inactivation of indigenous coliform bacteria in unfiltered surface water by ultraviolet light. Water Res 42:2729–2735

  4. Condon C, Squires CL (1995) Control of rRNA transcription in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Rev 59(4):623–645

  5. Dupray E, Caprais MP, Derrien A, Fach P (1997) Salmonella DNA persistence in natural seawaters using PCR analysis. J Appl Microbiol 82(4):507–510

  6. Flekna G, Polonca S, Wagner M, Smulders FJM, Mozina SS, Hein I (2007) Insufficient differentiation of live and dead Campylobacter jejuni and Listeria monocytogenes cells by ethidium monoazide (EMA) compromises EMA/real-time PCR. Res Microbiol 158:405–412

  7. Guy RA, Kapoor A, Holicka J, Shepherd D, Horgen PA (2006) A rapid molecular-based assay for direct quantification of viable bacteria in slaughterhouses. J Food Protection 69(6):1265–1272

  8. He JW, Jiang SC (2005) Quantification of enterococci and human adenoviruses in environmental samples by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(5):2250–2255

  9. He L, Lu J, Shi W (2007) Variability of fecal indicator bacteria in flowing and ponded waters in southern California: implications for bacterial TMDL development and implementation. Water Res 41:3132–3140

  10. Jeng HC, England AJ, Bradford HB (2005) Indicator organisms associated with stormwater suspended particles and estuarine sediment. J Environ Sci Health 40:779–791

  11. Josephson KL, Gerba CP, Pepper IL (1993) Polymerase chain reaction detection of nonviable bacterial pathogens. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(10):3513–3515

  12. Kay D, Stapleton CM, Wyer MD, McDonald AT, Crowther J, Paul N, Jones K, Francis C, Watkins J, Wilkinson J, Humphrey N, Lin B, Yang L, Falconer RA, Gardner S (2005) Decay of intestinal enterococci concentrations in high-energy estuarine and coastal waters: towards real-time T 90 values for modeling faecal indicators in recreational waters. Water Res 39:655–667

  13. LeChevallier MW, Evans TM, Seidler RJ (1981) Effect of turbidity on chlorination efficiency and bacterial persistence in drinking water. Appl Environ Microbiol 42(1):159–167

  14. Lee JL, Levin RE (2006) Use of ethidium bromide monoazide for quantification of viable and dead mixed bacterial flora from fish fillets by polymerase chain reaction. J Microbiol Methods 67:456–462

  15. Masters CI, Miles CA, Mackey BM (1994) Effect of stress treatments on the detection of Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by the polymerase chain reaction. J Appl Bacteriol 77(1):73–79

  16. Matsuda K, Tsuji H, Asahara T, Kado Y, Nomoto K (2007) Sensitive quantitative detection of commensal bacteria by rRNA-targeted reverse transcription-PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(1):32–39

  17. McGee P, Bolton DJ, Sheridan JJ, Earley B, Kelly G, Leonard N (2002) Survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in farm water: its role as a vector in the transmission of the organism within herds. J Appl Microbiol 93(4):706–713

  18. Mirpuri RG, Jones WL, McFeters GA, Ridgway HF (1997) Physiological stress in batch cultures of Pseudomonas putida 54G during toluene degradation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 18(6):406–413

  19. Nocker AN, Camper AK (2006) Selective removal of DNA from dead cells of mixed bacterial communities by use of ethidium monoazide. Appl Environ Microbiol 72(3):1997–2004

  20. Nocker AN, Cheung CY, Camper AK (2006) Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells. J Microbiol Methods 67:310–320

  21. Nogva HK, Dromtorp SM, Nissen H, Rudi K (2003) Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5′-nuclease PCR. BioTechniques 34:804–813

  22. Norton DM, Batt CA (1999) Detection of viable Listeria monocytogenes with a 5′ nuclease PCR assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(5):2122–2127

  23. Ridgway HF, Olson BH (1981) Chlorine resistance patterns of bacteria from two drinking water distribution systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 44(4):972–987

  24. Rudi K, Moen B, Dromtorp SM, Holck AL (2005a) Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(2):1018–1024

  25. Rudi K, Naterstad K, Dromtorp SM, Holo H (2005b) Detection of viable and dead Listeria monocytogenes on gouda-like cheeses by real-time PCR. Lett Appl Microbiol 40:301–306

  26. Sheridan GEC, Masters CI, Shallcross JA, Mackey BM (1998) Detection of mRNA by reverse transcription-PCR as an indicator of viability in Escherichia coli cells. Appl Environ Microbiol 64(4):1313–1318

  27. Stewart MH, Olson BH (1992) Physiological studies of chloramine resistance developed by Klebsiella pneumoniae under low nutrient growth conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 58(9):2918–2927

  28. Stewart MH, Olson B (1996) Bacterial resistance to potable water disinfectants. In: Hurst CJ (ed) Modeling disease transmission and its prevention by disinfection. Cambridge University Press, pp 140–192

  29. Wang S, Levin RE (2005) Discrimination of viable Vibrio vulnificus cells from dead cells in real-time PCR. J Microbiol Methods 64:1–8

  30. Yaron S, Matthews KR (2002) A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of viable Escherichia coli O157:H7: investigation of specific target genes. J Appl Microbiol 92:633–640

  31. Yu Z, Mohn WW (1999) Killing two birds with one stone: simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from activated sludge biomass. Can J Microbiol 45:269–272

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the UC Center for Water Resources grant UCCWR-35554 and the Urban Water Research Center at UC Irvine for funding this study. We thank the Santa Margarita Water District wastewater treatment plant in Orange County for providing wastewater effluent samples. We also thank J.Y. Le, Dr. M.Y. Wang, and W. Chu for their assistance.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Author information

Correspondence to Betty H. Olson.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gedalanga, P.B., Olson, B.H. Development of a quantitative PCR method to differentiate between viable and nonviable bacteria in environmental water samples. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 82, 587–596 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1846-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cell viability
  • Escherichia coli
  • qPCR
  • Ethidium monoazide bromide
  • Environmental and wastewaters