Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 81, Issue 2, pp 327–338 | Cite as

Comparative proteome analysis of robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae insights into industrial continuous and batch fermentation

  • Jing-Sheng Cheng
  • Bin Qiao
  • Ying-Jin YuanEmail author
Genomics and Proteomics


A robust Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain has been widely applied in continuous and batch/fed-batch industrial fermentation. However, little is known about the molecular basis of fermentative behavior of this strain in the two realistic fermentation processes. In this paper, we presented comparative proteomic profiling of the industrial yeast in the industrial fermentation processes. The expression levels of most identified protein were closely interrelated with the different stages of fermentation processes. Our results indicate that, among the 47 identified protein spots, 17 of them belonging to 12 enzymes were involved in pentose phosphate, glycolysis, and gluconeogenesis pathways and glycerol biosynthetic process, indicating that a number of pathways will need to be inactivated to improve ethanol production. The differential expressions of eight oxidative response and heat-shock proteins were also identified, suggesting that it is necessary to keep the correct cellular redox or osmotic state in the two industrial fermentation processes. Moreover, there are significant differences in changes of protein levels between the two industrial fermentation processes, especially these proteins associated with the glycolysis and gluconeogenesis pathways. These findings provide a molecular understanding of physiological adaptation of industrial strain for optimizing the performance of industrial bioethanol fermentation.


Continuous fermentation Batch/fed-batch fermentation Proteomic analysis Bioethanol Saccharomyces cerevisiae 



The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Key Program Grant No. 20736006), the National Basic Research Program of China (“973” Program: 2007CB714301), Key Projects in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program (No.2007BAD42B02), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20706044).

Supplementary material

253_2008_1733_MOESM1_ESM.doc (105 kb)
ESM 1(DOC 105 KB)


  1. Aguilera A (1986) Deletion of the phosphoglucose isomerase structural gene makes growth and sporulation glucose dependent in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 204:310–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandre H, Ansanay-Galeote V, Dequin S, Blondin B (2001) Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett 498:98–103CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfenore S, Molina-Jouve C, Guillouet SE, Uribelarrea JL, Goma G, Benbadis L (2002) Improving ethanol production and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a vitamin feeding strategy during fed-batch process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 60:67–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Alper H, Moxley J, Nevoigt E, Fink GR, Stephanopoulos G (2006) Engineering yeast transcription machinery for improved ethanol tolerance and production. Science 314:1565–1568PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson RM, Bitterman KJ, Wood JG, Medvedik O, Sinclair DA (2003) Nicotinamide and PNC1 govern lifespan extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 423:181–185PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ansell R, Granath K, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Adler L (1997) The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD+-dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. EMBO J 16:2179–2187PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Bai FW, Anderson WA, Moo-Young M (2008) Ethanol fermentation technologies from sugar and starch feedstocks. Biotechnol Adv 26:89–105PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Blomberg A, Adler L (1992) Physiology of osmotolerance in fungi. Adv Microb Physiol 33:145–212PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Boucherie H, Dujardin G, Kermorgant M, Monribot C, Slonimski P, Perrot M (1995) Two-dimensional protein map of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: construction of a gene-protein index. Yeast 11:601–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254Google Scholar
  11. Caesar R, Palmfeldt J, Gustafsson JS, Pettersson E, Hashemi SH, Blomberg A (2007) Comparative proteomics of industrial lager yeast reveals differential expression of the cerevisiae and non-cerevisiae parts of their genomes. Proteomics 7:4135–4147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cakar ZP, Seker UO, Tamerler C, Sonderegger M, Sauer U (2005) Evolutionary engineering of multiple-stress resistant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 5:569–578Google Scholar
  13. Cheng JS, Yuan YJ (2006) Proteomic analysis reveals the spatial heterogeneity of immobilized Taxus cuspidata cells in support matrices. Proteomics 6:2199–2207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheraiti N, Sauvage FX, Salmon JM (2008) Acetaldehyde addition throughout the growth phase alleviates the phenotypic effect of zinc deficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 77:1093–1109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. de Groot MJ, Daran-Lapujade P, van Breukelen B, Knijnenburg TA, de Hulster EA, Reinders MJ, Pronk JT, Heck AJ, Slijper M (2007) Quantitative proteomics and transcriptomics of anaerobic and aerobic yeast cultures reveals post-transcriptional regulation of key cellular processes. Microbiology 153:3864–3878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickinson JR, Smith ME, Swanson TR, Williams AS, Wingfield JM (1988) The cdc30 mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae affects phosphoglucose isomerase, the cell cycle and sporulation. J Gen Microbiol 134:2475–2480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Du C, Zhang Y, Li Y, Cao Z (2007) Novel redox potential-based screening strategy for rapid isolation of Klebsiella pneumoniae mutants with enhanced 1,3-propanediol-producing capability. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4515–4521PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fabrizio P, Longo VD (2003) The chronological life span of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Aging Cell 2:73–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gallo CM, Smith DL Jr, Smith JS (2004) Nicotinamide clearance by Pnc1 directly regulates Sir2-mediated silencing and longevity. Mol Cell Biol 24:1301–1312PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibson BR, Lawrence SJ, Leclaire JP, Powell CD, Smart KA (2007) Yeast responses to stresses associated with industrial brewery handling. FEMS Microbiol Rev 31:535–569PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Godon C, Lagniel G, Lee J, Buhler JM, Kieffer S, Perrot M, Boucherie H, Toledano MB, Labarre J (1998) The H2O2 stimulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 273:22480–22489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gurden SP, Westerhuis JA, Smilde AK (2002) Monitoring of batch processes using spectroscopy. AIChE J 48:2283–2297Google Scholar
  23. Hansen R, Pearson SY, Brosnan JM, Meaden PG, Jamieson DJ (2006) Proteomic analysis of a distilling strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during industrial grain fermentation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 72:116–125PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hohmann S (1997) Pyruvate decarboxylases. In: Zimmermann F, Entian KD (eds) Yeast sugar metabolism. Biochemistry, genetics, biotechnology, and applications. Technomic, Lancaster, pp 187–212Google Scholar
  25. Hohmann S (2005) The yeast systems biology network: mating communities. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16:356–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hu Y, Wang G, Chen GY, Fu X, Yao SQ (2003) Proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under metal stress by two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 24:1458–1470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jules M, François J, Parrou JL (2005) Autonomous oscillations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during batch cultures on trehalose. FEBS J 272:1490–1500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim YH, Han KY, Lee K, Lee J (2005) Proteome response of Escherichia coli fed-batch culture to temperature downshift. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:786–793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Stephanopoulos G (2008) Assessing the potential of mutational strategies to elicit new phenotypes in industrial strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:2319–2324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kolkman A, Olsthoorn MM, Heeremans CE, Heck AJ, Slijper M (2005) Comparative proteome analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in chemostat cultures limited for glucose or ethanol. Mol Cell Proteomics 4:1–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kolkman A, Daran-Lapujade P, Fullaondo A, Olsthoorn MM, Pronk JT, Slijper M, Heck AJ (2006) Proteome analysis of yeast response to various nutrient limitations. Mol Syst Biol 2:1–16Google Scholar
  32. Longo VD, Gralla EB, Valentine JS (1996) Superoxide dismutase activity is essential for stationary phase survival in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mitochondrial production of toxic oxygen species in vivo. J Biol Chem 271:12275–12280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Ludwig JR 2nd, Foy JJ, Elliott SG, McLaughlin CS (1982) Synthesis of specific identified, phosphorylated, heat shock, and heat stroke proteins through the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2:117–126PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Maestre O, García-Martínez T, Peinado RA, Mauricio JC (2008) Effects of ADH2 overexpression in Saccharomyces bayanus during alcoholic fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:702–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Magherini F, Tani C, Gamberi T, Caselli A, Bianchi L, Bini L, Modesti A (2007) Protein expression profiles in Saccharomyces cerevisiae during apoptosis induced by H2O2. Proteomics 7:1434–1445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. McAlister L, Holland MJ (1985) Differential expression of the three yeast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes. J Biol Chem 260:15019–15027PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pahlman AK, Granath K, Ansell R, Hohmann S, Adler L (2001) The yeast glycerol 3-phosphatases Gpp1p and Gpp2p are required for glycerol biosynthesis and differentially involved in the cellular responses to osmotic, anaerobic, and oxidative stress. J Biol Chem 276:3555–3563PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Pérez-Torrado R, Bruno-Bárcena JM, Matallana E (2005) Monitoring stress-related genes during the process of biomass propagation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains used for wine making. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6831–6837PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Perrot M, Guieysse-Peugeot AL, Massoni A, Espagne C, Claverol S, Monteiro Silva R, Jenö P, Santos M, Bonneu M, Boucherie H (2007) Yeast proteome map (update 2006). Proteomics 7:1117–1120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pham TK, Wright PC (2008) Proteomic Analysis of calcium alginate-immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high-gravity fermentation conditions. J Proteome Res 7:515–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Pham TK, Chong PK, Gan CS, Wright PC (2006) Proteomic analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae under high gravity fermentation conditions. J Proteome Res 5:3411–3419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Querin L, Sanvito R, Magni F, Busti S, Dorsselaer AV, Alberghina L, Vanoni M (2008) Proteomic analysis of a nutritional shift-up in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies Gvp36 as a BAR-containing protein involved in vesicular traffic and nutritional adaptation. J Biol Chem 283:4730–4743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Ragu S, Faye G, Iraqui I, Masurel-Heneman A, Kolodner RD, Huang ME (2007) Oxygen metabolism and reactive oxygen species cause chromosomal rearrangements and cell death. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9747–9752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rossignol T, Postaire O, Storaï J, Blondin B (2006) Analysis of the genomic response of a wine yeast to rehydration and inoculation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 71:699–712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Talebnia F, Taherzadeh MJ (2006) In situ detoxification and continuous cultivation of dilute-acid hydrolyzate to ethanol by encapsulated S. cerevisiae. J Biotechnol 125:377–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Thomsson E, Gustafsson L, Larsson C (2005) Starvation response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae grown in anaerobic nitrogen- or carbon-limited chemostat cultures. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3007–3013PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Trabalzini L, Paffetti A, Scaloni A, Talamo F, Ferro E, Coratza G, Bovalini L, Lusini P, Martelli P, Santucci A (2003) Proteomic response to physiological fermentation stresses in a wild-type wine strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem J 370:35–46PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. van Hoek P, de Hulster E, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT (2000) Fermentative capacity in high-cell-density fed-batch cultures of baker’s yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 68:517–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Varela JC, van Beekvelt C, Planta RJ, Mager WH (1992) Osmostress-induced changes in yeast gene expression. Mol Microbiol 6:2183–2190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Walfridsson M, Hallborn J, Penttilä M, Keränen S, Hahn-Hägerdal B (1995) Xylose-metabolizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressing the TKL1 and TAL1 genes encoding the pentose phosphate pathway enzymes transketolase and transaldolase. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:4184–4190PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang W, Sun J, Hartlep M, Deckwer WD, Zeng AP (2003) Combined use of proteomic analysis and enzyme activity assays for metabolic pathway analysis of glycerol fermentation by Klebsiella pneumoniae. Biotechnol Bioeng 83:525–536PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Wang J, Xue Y, Feng X, Li X, Wang H, Li W, Zhao C, Cheng X, Ma Y, Zhou P, Yin J, Bhatnagar A, Wang R, Liu S (2004) An analysis of the proteomic profile for Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis under optimal culture conditions. Proteomics 4:136–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang Y, Wu SL, Hancock WS, Trala R, Kessler M, Taylor AH, Patel PS, Aon JC (2005) Proteomic profiling of Escherichia coli proteins under high cell density fed-batch cultivation with overexpression of phosphogluconolactonase. Biotechnol Prog 21:1401–1411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Wildgruber R, Reil G, Drews O, Parlar H, Görg A (2002) Web-based two-dimensional database of Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins using immobilized pH gradients from pH 6 to pH 12 and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Proteomics 2:727–732PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu CY, Bird AJ, Winge DR, Eide DJ (2007) Regulation of the yeast TSA1 peroxiredoxin by ZAP1 is an adaptive response to the oxidative stress of zinc deficiency. J Biol Chem 282:2184–2195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Yin Z, Stead D, Selway L, Walker J, Riba-Garcia I, McLnerney T, Gaskell S, Oliver SG, Cash P, Brown AJ (2004) Proteomic response to amino acid starvation in Candida albicans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proteomics 4:2425–2436PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zuzuarregui A, Monteoliva L, Gil C, del Olmo M (2006) Transcriptomic and proteomic approach for understanding the molecular basis of adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to wine fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:836–847PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering (Tianjin University), Ministry of Education, School of Chemical Engineering and TechnologyTianjin UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations