Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 80, Issue 5, pp 891–898 | Cite as

Microalgae-based processes for the biodegradation of pretreated piggery wastewaters

  • Cristina González
  • Judith Marciniak
  • Santiago Villaverde
  • Pedro A. García-Encina
  • Raúl MuñozEmail author
Environmental Biotechnology


The potential and limitations of photosynthetic oxygenation on carbon and nitrogen removal from swine slurry were investigated in batch experiments using Chlorella sorokiniana and an acclimated activated sludge as model microorganisms. While algal–bacterial systems exhibited similar performance than aerated activated sludge in tests supplied with four and eight times diluted slurry, a severe inhibition of the biodegradation process was recorded in undiluted and two times diluted wastewater. Daily pH adjustment to 7 in enclosed algal–bacterial tests at several swine slurry dilutions allowed the treatment of up to two times diluted slurries (containing up to 1,180 mg N-NH4+ l−1). The combination of high pH levels and high NH4+ concentrations was thus identified as the main inhibitory factor governing the efficiency of photosynthetically oxygenated processes treating swine slurry. Measurements of soluble total organic carbon (TOC) and volatile fatty acids (VFA) present in the slurry suggested that VFA degradation (mainly acetic and propionic acid) accounted for most of the soluble TOC removal, especially during the initial stages of the biodegradation process. On the other hand, assimilation into biomass and nitrification to NO2 constituted the main NH4+ removal processes in enclosed algal–bacterial systems.


Algal–bacterial systems Ammonia inhibition Biodegradation Chlorella sorokiniana Photosynthetic oxygenation Swine slurry 



This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (RYC-2007-01667 contract and projects PPQ2006-08230, CONSOLIDER-CSD 2007-00055 and CTC2007-64324) and the Autonomous Government of “Castilla y Leon” through the Institute of Agriculture Technology (ITACYL project VA13-C3-1). Araceli Crespo is also gratefully acknowledged for her practical assistance.


  1. Barlow EWR, Boersma L, Phinney HK, Miner JR (1975) Algal growth in diluted pig waste. Agric Environ 2:339–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boursier H, Béline F, Paul E (2005) Piggery wastewater characterization for biological nitrogen removal process design. Bioresour Technol 96:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edn. American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Evans MR, Smith MPW, Deans EA, Svoboda IF, Thacker FE (1986) Nitrogen and aerobic treatment of slurry. Agric Wastes 15:205–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Garrett MK, Allen MDB (1976) Photosynthetic purification of the liquid phase of animal slurry. Environ Pollut 10:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. González-Fernández C, Nieto-Diez PP, León-Cofreces C, García-Encina PA (2008) Solids and nutrients removals from the liquid fraction of swine slurry through screening and flocculation treatment and influence of these processes on anaerobic biodegradability. Bioresour Technol 99:6233–6239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groeneweg J, Klein B, Mohn FH, Runkel KH, Stengel E (1980) First results of outdoor treatment of pig manure with algal–bacterial systems. In: Shelef G, Soeder CJ (eds) Algae biomass. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 255–264Google Scholar
  8. Kim MK, Park JW, Park CS, Kim SJ, Jeune KH, Chang MU, Acreman J (2007) Enhanced production of Scenedesmus spp. (green microalgae) using a new medium containing fermented swine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 98:2220–2228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee YK (2001) Microalgal mass culture systems and methods: Their limitation and potential. J Appl Phycol 13:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mulbry W, Kebede-Westhead E, Pizarro C, Sikora L (2005) Recycling of manure nutrients: use of algal biomass from dairy manure treatment as a slow release fertilizer. Bioresour Technol 96:451–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Muñoz R, Guieysse B (2006) Algal–bacterial processes for the treatment of hazardous contaminants: a review. Water Res 40:2799–2815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Muñoz R, Rolvering C, Guieysse B, Mattiasson B (2005) Photosynthetically oxygenated acetonitrile biodegradation by an algal-bacterial microcosm: a pilot scale study. Water Sci Technol 51(12):261–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Muñoz R, Díaz LF, Bordel S, Villaverde S (2007) Inhibitory effects of catechol accumulation on benzene biodegradation in Pseudomonas putida F1 cultures. Chemosphere 64:244–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Olguin EJ (2003) Phycoremediation: key issues for cost-effective nutrient removal processes. Biotechnol Adv 22:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oswald WJ (1988) Micro-algae and waste-water treatment. In: Borowitzka MBL (ed) Micro-algal biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 305–328Google Scholar
  16. Pizarro C, Mulbry W, Blersch D, Kangas (2006) An economic assessment of algal turf scrubber technology for treatment of dairy manure effluent. Ecol Eng 26:321–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD (2003) Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. McGraw Hill, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  18. Travieso L, Benítez F, Sánchez E, Borja R, Colmenarejo MF (2006) Production of biomass (algae–bacteria) by using a mixture of settled swine and sewage as substrate. J Environ Sci Health A 41:415–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang B, Dong W, Zhang J, Xiangdong C (1996) Experimental study of high rate pond system treating piggery wastewater. Water Sci Technol 54(11):125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wilkie AC, Mulbry WW (2002) Recovery of dairy manure nutrients by benthic freshwater algae. Bioresour Technol 84:81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina González
    • 1
  • Judith Marciniak
    • 1
  • Santiago Villaverde
    • 1
  • Pedro A. García-Encina
    • 1
  • Raúl Muñoz
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of ValladolidValladolidSpain

Personalised recommendations