Advertisement

Immunogenetics

, Volume 70, Issue 9, pp 553–562 | Cite as

Genome-wide association study identifies loci associated with milk leukocyte phenotypes following experimental challenge with Streptococcus uberis

  • Lydia Siebert
  • Margaret E. Staton
  • Susan Headrick
  • Mark Lewis
  • Barbara Gillespie
  • Charles Young
  • Raul A. Almeida
  • Stephen P. Oliver
  • Gina M. Pighetti
Original Article
  • 136 Downloads

Abstract

Mastitis is a detrimental disease in the dairy industry that decreases milk quality and costs upwards of $2 billion annually. Often, mastitis results from bacteria entering the gland through the teat opening. Streptococcus uberis is responsible for a high percentage of subclinical and clinical mastitis. Following an intramammary experimental challenge with S. uberis on Holstein cows (n = 40), milk samples were collected and somatic cell counts (SCC) were determined by the Dairy Herd Improvement Association Laboratory. Traditional genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have utilized test day SCC or SCC lactation averages to identify loci of interest. Our approach utilizes SCC collected following a S. uberis experimental challenge to generate three novel phenotypes: (1) area under the curve (AUC) of SCC for 0–7 days and (2) 0–28 days post-challenge; and (3) when SCC returned to below 200,000 cells/mL post-challenge (< 21 days, 21–28 days, or > 28 days). Polymorphisms were identified using Illumina’s BovineSNP50 v2 DNA BeadChip. Associations were tested using Plink software and identified 16 significant (p < 1.0 × 10−4) single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the phenotypes. Most significant SNPs were in genes linked to cell signaling, migration, and apoptosis. Several have been recognized in relation to infectious processes (ATF7, SGK1, and PACRG), but others less so (TRIO, GLRA1, CELSR2, TIAM2, CPE). Further investigation of these genes and their roles in inflammation (e.g., SCC) can provide potential targets that influence resolution of mammary gland infection. Likewise, further investigation of the identified SNP with mastitis and other disease phenotypes can provide greater insight to the potential of these SNP as genetic markers.

Keywords

Mastitis Genetics GWAS S. uberis Candidate genes Post-partum 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Arnold Saxton of the department of Animal Science at the University of Tennessee for his assistance in converting the data format. A special thank you to the staff at the East Tennessee Research and Education Center Little River Unit for their aid in animal care and milking.

Funding information

The challenge portion of this study was supported by USDA-NIFA-AFRI (2011-67015-30168). The remaining portions of the study were supported by UTAgResearch and the AgInnovation fund.

References

  1. Alter A, Fava VM, Huong NT, Singh M, Orlova M, Van Thuc N et al (2013) Linkage disequilibrium and age-at-diagnosis are critical for replicating genetic associations across ethnic groups in leprosy. Hum Genet 132:107–116CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baeuerle PA, Henkel T (1994) Function and activation of NF-kappaB in the immune system. Annu Rev Immunol 12:141–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannerman DD, Paape MJ, Goff JP, Kimura K, Lippolis JD, Hope JC (2004) Innate immune respons to intramammary infection with Serratia marcescens and Streptococcus uberis. Vet Res 35:681–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beall SA, Boekelheide K, Johnson KJ (2005) Hybrid GPCR/cadherin (Celsr) proteins in rat testis are expressed with cell type specificity and exhibit differential sertoli cell—germ cell adhesion activity. J Androl 26:529–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Boussaha M, Esquerre D, Barbieri J, Djari A, Pinton A, Letaief R et al (2015) Genome-wide study of structural variants in bovine Holstein, Montbeliarde and Normande dairy breeds. PLoS One 10(8):e0135931CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradley AJ, Leach KA, Breen JE, Green LE, Green MJ (2007) Survey of the incidence and aetiology of mastitis on dairy farms in England and Wales. Vet Rec 160:253–258CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bragina EY, Trys ES, Rudko AA, Ivanisenko VA, Freidin MB (2016) Novel tuberculosis susceptibility candidate genes revealed by the reconstruction and analysis of associative networks. Infect Genet Evol 46:118–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen JS, Su IJ, Leu YW, Young KC, Sun HS (2012) Expression of T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 2 (TIAM2) promotes proliferation and invasion of liver cancer. Int J Cancer 130:1302–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chiu CY, Leng S, Martin KA, Kim E, Gorman S, Duhl DM (1999) Cloning and characterization of T-cell lymphoma invasion and metastasis 2 (TIAM2), a novel guanine nucleotide exchange factor related to TIAM1. Genomics 61:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cole JB, VanRaden PM, O’Connell JR, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Schnabel RD et al (2009) Distribution and location of genetic effects for dairy traits. J Dairy Sci 92:2931–2946CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cole JB, Wiggans GR, Ma L, Sonstegard TS, Lawlor TJ Jr, Crooker BA et al (2011) Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary U.S. Holstein cows. BMC Genomics 12:408.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-408 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Collins T, Read MA, Neish AS, Whitley MZ, Thanos D, Maniatis T (1995) Transcriptional regulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules: NF-kappa B and cytokine-inducible enhancers. FASEB J 9:899–909CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Croft D, Mundo AF, Haw R, Milacic M, Weiser J, Wu G, Caudy M, Garapati P, Gillespie M, Kamdar MR, Jassal B, Jupe S, Matthews L, May B, Palatnik S, Rothfels K, Shamovsky V, Song H, Williams M, Birney E, Hermjakob H, Stein L, D'Eustachio P (2014) The Reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D472–D477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME (2008) Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein–Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics 179:1503–1512CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dohoo IR, Smith J, Andersen S, Kelton DF, Godden S (2011) Diagnosing intramammary infections: evaluation of definitions based on a single milk sample. J Dairy Sci 94:250–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L, Sidiropoulos K, Gillespie M, Garapati P, Haw R, Jassal B, Korninger F, May B, Milacic M, Roca CD, Rothfels K, Sevilla C, Shamovsky V, Shorser S, Varusai T, Viteri G, Weiser J, Wu G, Stein L, Hermjakob H, D’Eustachio P (2018) The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D649–D655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fricker LD (1988) Carboxypeptidase E. Annu Rev Physiol 50:309–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerard NP, Gerard C (1991) The chemotactic receptor for human C5a anaphylatoxin. Nature 349:614–617CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunderson KL, Steemers FJ, Lee G, Mendoza LG, Chee MS (2005) A genome-wide scalable SNP genotyping assay using microarray technology. Nat Genet 37:549–554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Haile-Mariam M, Bowman PJ, Goddard ME (2003) Genetic and environmental relationship among calving interval, survival, persistency of milk yield and somatic cell count in dairy cattle. Livest Prod Sci 80:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Han X, Tachado SD, Koziel H, Boisvert WA (2012) Leu128 (L128) and Val247(V247) of CXCR1 are critical amino acid residues for g protein coupling and receptor activation. PLoS One 7:e42765CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Jayarao BM, Oliver SP (1994) Polymerase chain reaction-based DNA fingerprinting for identification of Streptococcus and Enterococcus species isolated from bovine milk. J Food Prot 57:240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jayarao BM, Oliver SP, Matthews KR, King SH (1991) Comparative evaluation of Vitek Gram-positive identification system and API Rapid Strep system for identification of Streptococcus species of bovine origin. Vet Micro 26:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jayarao BM, Gillespie BE, Oliver SP (1996) Application of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting for species identification of bacteria isolated from bovine milk. J Food Prot 59:615–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jayarao BM, Gillespie BE, Lewis MJ, Dowlen HH, Oliver SP (1999) Epidemiology of Streptococcus uberis intramammary infections in a dairy herd. J Vet Med, Series B 46:433–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kennedy BW, Sethar MS, Moxley JE, Downey BR (1982) Heritability of somatic cell count and its relationship with milk yield and composition in Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 65:843–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lang F, Shumilina E (2013) Regulation of ion channels by the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase SGK1. FASEB J 27:3–12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lang F, Artunc F, Vallon V (2009) The physiological impact of the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase SGK1. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 18:439–448CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lang F, Strutz-Seebohm N, Seebohm G, Lang UE (2010) Significance of SGK1 in the regulation of neuronal function. J Physiol 588:3349–3354CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawless N, Reinhardt TA, Bryan K, Baker M, Pesch B, Zimmerman D et al (2014) MicroRNA regulation of bovine monocyte inflammatory and metabolic networks in an in vivo infection model. G3 (Bethesda) 4:957–971CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee TK, Murthy SR, Cawley NX, Dhanvantari S, Hewitt SM, Lou H et al (2011) An N-terminal truncated carboxypeptidase E splice isoform induces tumor growth and is a biomarker for predicting future metastasis in human cancers. J Clin Invest 121:880–892CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Manly KF (2005) Reliability of statistical associations between genes and disease. Immunogenetics 57:549–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsusaka T, Fujikawa K, Nishio Y, Mukaida N, Matsushima K, Kishimoto T, Akira S (1993) Transcription factors NF-IL6 and NF-kappa B synergistically activate transcription of the inflammatory cytokines. interleukin 6 and interleukin 8 PNAS 90:10193–10197PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Meredith BK, Kearney FJ, Finlay EK, Bradley DG, Fahey AG, Berry DP, Lynn DJ (2012) Genome-wide associations for milk production and somatic cell score in Holstein-Friesian cattle in Ireland. BMC Genet 13:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Østerås O, Sølverød L, Reksen O (2006) Milk culture results in a large Norwegian survey—effects of season, parity, days in milk, resistance, and clustering. J Dairy Sci 89:1010–1023CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Paape MJ, Bannerman DD, Zhao X, Lee J-W (2003) The bovine neutrophil: structure and function in blood and milk. Vet Res 34:597–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Pérez-Cabal MA, Charfeddine N (2013) Genetic relationship between clinical mastitis and several traits of interest in Spanish Holstein dairy cattle. Interbull Bulletin 47:77–81Google Scholar
  38. Petrovski KR, Williamson NB, Lopez-Villalobos N, Parkinson TJ, Tucker IG (2011) Culture results from milk samples submitted to veterinary diagnostic laboratories from August 2003 to December 2006 in New Zealand. N Z Vet J 59:317–322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Piepers S, De Meulemeester L, de Kruif A, Opsomer G, Barkema HW, De Vliegher S (2007) Prevalence and distribution of mastitis pathogens in subclinically infected dairy cows in Flanders, Belgium. J Dairy Res 74:478–483CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pighetti GM et al. (2017) Vaccination with recombinant Streptococcus uberis Adhesion Molecule alters immune response to experimental challenge. Int J Vet Dairy Sci. Published online: 05/15/2017Google Scholar
  41. Pryce JE, Bolormaa S, Chamberlain AJ, Bowman PJ, Savin K, Goddard ME, Hayes BJ (2010) A validated genome-wide association study in 2 dairy cattle breeds for milk production and fertility traits using variable length haplotypes. J Dairy Sci 93:3331–3345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Purcell S, Cherny SS, Sham PC (2003) Genetic Power Calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19(1):149–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PIW, Daly MJ, Sham PC (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 81:559–575CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Pyörälä S (2008) Mastitis in post-partum dairy cows. Reprod Domest Anim 43:252–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Raman D, Sai J, Neel NF, Chew CS, Richmond A (2010) LIM and SH3 protein-1 modulates CXCR2-mediated cell migration. PLoS One 5:e10050CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Rambeaud M, Pighetti G (2007) Differential calcium signaling in dairy cows with specific CXCR1 genotypes potentially related to interleukin-8 receptor functionality. Immunogenetics 59:53–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rambeaud M, Almeida RA, Pighetti GM, Oliver SP (2003) Dynamics of leukocytes and cytokines during experimentally induced Streptococcus uberis mastitis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 96:193–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rambeaud M, Clift R, Pighetti GM (2006) Association of a bovine CXCR2 gene polymorphism with neutrophil survival and killing ability. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 111:231–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Richardson RM, Marjoram RJ, Barak LS, Snyderman R (2003) Role of the cytoplasmic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration, activation, and regulation. J Immunol 170:2904–2911CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, Mesirov JP (2011) Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 29:24–26CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Rooney C, White G, Nazgiewicz A, Woodcock SA, Anderson KI, Ballestrem C, Malliri A (2010) The Rac activator STEF (Tiam2) regulates cell migration by microtubule-mediated focal adhesion disassembly. EMBO Rep 11:292–298CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Rupp R, Boichard D (2003) Genetics of resistance to mastitis in dairy cattle. Vet Res 34:671–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Ryman VE, Packiriswamy N, Sordillo LM (2016) Apoptosis of endothelial cells by 13-HPODE contributes to impairment of endothelial barrier integrity. Med Inflammation 2016:13.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9867138
  54. Schepers AJ, Lam TJ, Schukken YH, Wilmink JB, Hanekamp WJ (1997) Estimation of variance components for somatic cell counts to determine thresholds for uninfected quarters. J Dairy Sci 80:1833–1840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schukken YH, Günther J, Fitzpatrick J, Fontaine MC, Goetze L, Holst O, Leigh J, Petzl W, Schuberth HJ, Sipka A, Smith DGE, Quesnell R, Watts J, Yancey R, Zerbe H, Gurjar A, Zadoks RN, Seyfert HM (2011) Host-response patterns of intramammary infections in dairy cows. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 144:270–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Seipel K, O’Brien SP, Iannotti E, Medley QG, Streuli M (2001) Tara, a novel F-actin binding protein, associates with the Trio guanine nucleotide exchange factor and regulates actin cytoskeletal organization. J Cell Sci 114:389–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Shi Y (2017) The spliceosome: a protein-directed metalloribozyme. J Mol Biol 429:2640–2653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Shima Y, Kawaguchi SY, Kosaka K, Nakayama M, Hoshino M, Nabeshima Y, Hirano T, Uemura T (2007) Opposing roles in neurite growth control by two seven-pass transmembrane cadherins. Nat Neurosci 10:963–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sladek Z, Rysanek D, Ryznarova H, Faldyna M (2006) The role of neutrophil apoptosis during experimentally induced Streptococcus uberis mastitis. Vet Med(Praha) 51:437–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Slama P, Sladek Z, Rysanek D, Langrova T (2009) Effect of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus uberis on apoptosis of bovine mammary gland lymphocytes. Res Vet Sci 87:233–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Spencer CCA, Su Z, Donnelly P, Marchini J (2009) Designing genome-wide association studies: sample size, power, imputation, and the choice of genotyping chip. PLoS Genet 5:e1000477CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Spittler A et al (1999) Immunomodulatory effects of glycine on LPS-treated monocytes: reduced TNF-α production and accelerated IL-10 expression. FASEB J 13:563–571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Steemers FJ, Chang W, Lee G, Barker DL, Shen R, Gunderson KL (2006) Whole-genome genotyping with the single-base extension assay. Nat Methods 3:31–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sternberg EM (2006) Neural regulation of innate immunity: a coordinated nonspecific host response to pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol 6:318–328CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Tassi R, McNeilly TN, Fitzpatrick JL, Fontaine MC, Reddick D, Ramage C et al (2013) Strain-specific pathogenicity of putative host-adapted and nonadapted strains of Streptococcus uberis in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 96(8):5129–5145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Van den Eynden J, Ali SS, Horwood N, Carmans S, Brone B, Hellings N et al (2009) Glycine and glycine receptor signalling in non-neuronal cells. Front Mol Neurosci 2:9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. van Rijssel J, van Buul JD (2012) The many faces of the guanine-nucelotide exchange factor trio. Cell Adhes Migr 6:482–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Verbeke J, Piepers S, Supré K, De Vliegher S (2014) Pathogen-specific incidence rate of clinical mastitis in Flemish dairy herds, severity, and association with herd hygiene. J Dairy Sci 97:6926–6934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Wedlock DN, Buddle BM, Williamson J, Lacy-Hulbert SJ, Turner SA, Subharat S, Heiser A (2014) Dairy cows produce cytokine and cytotoxic T cell responses following vaccination with an antigenic fraction from Streptococcus uberis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 160(1–2):51–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Weller JI, Saran A, Zeliger Y (1992) Genetic and environmental relationships among somatic cell count, bacterial infection, and clinical mastitis. J Dairy Sci 75:2532–2540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wheeler M, Stachlewitz RF, Yamashina S, Ikejima K, Morrow AL, Thurman RG (2000) Glycine-gated chloride channels in neutrophils attenuate calcium influx and superoxide production. FASEB J 14:476–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Wiggans GR, Shook GE (1987) A lactation measure of somatic cell count. J Dairy Sci 70:2666–2672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Wilson DJ, Gonzalez RN, Das HH (1997) Bovine mastitis pathogens in New York and Pennsylvania: prevalence and effects on somatic cell count and milk production. J Dairy Sci 80:2592–2598CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Wu C, Yosef N, Thalhamer T, Zhu C, Xiao S, Kishi Y, Regev A, Kuchroo V (2013) Induction of pathogenic Th17 cells by inducible salt sensing kinase SGK1. Nature 496(7446):513–517CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Yoshida K, Maekawa T, Zhu Y, Renard-Guillet C, Chatton B, Inoue K, Uchiyama T, Ishibashi KI, Yamada T, Ohno N, Shirahige K, Okada-Hatakeyama M, Ishii S (2015) The transcription factor ATF7 mediates lipopolysaccharide-induced epigenetic changes in macrophages involved in innate immunological memory. Nat Immunol 16:1034–1043CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Zadoks RN (2007) Sources and epidemiology of Streptococcus uberis, with special emphasis on mastitis in dairy cattle. Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2:15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lydia Siebert
    • 1
  • Margaret E. Staton
    • 2
  • Susan Headrick
    • 1
  • Mark Lewis
    • 1
  • Barbara Gillespie
    • 1
  • Charles Young
    • 3
  • Raul A. Almeida
    • 1
  • Stephen P. Oliver
    • 1
    • 4
  • Gina M. Pighetti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal ScienceThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Entomology and Plant PathologyThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.ZoetisFlorham ParkUSA
  4. 4.AgResearchThe University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations